La Jeonbuk Bank de Corée du Sud s'associe à Ripple pour les paiements transfrontaliers

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

La banque sud-coréenne Jeonbuk Bank s'est associée à la société de paiements basée sur la blockchain, Ripple, pour déployer son système de paiements transfrontaliers à destination de ses clients professionnels. La plateforme Ripple Payments permettra aux clients de la banque de régler des virements internationaux en quelques secondes ou minutes, 24h/24 et 7j/7. Ce service cible notamment les entreprises d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne. Selon Ripple, ce système offre des capacités de transfert plus rapides et moins coûteuses que les virements conventionnels transitant par des banques intermédiaires via le réseau SWIFT, qui peuvent prendre plusieurs jours. Les détails opérationnels, tels que les couloirs de paiement pris en charge, les devises, les frais ou l'utilisation éventuelle de cryptomonnaies comme le XRP, n'ont pas été dévoilés. Il s'agit du troisième partenariat de Ripple avec une institution financière sud-coréenne cette année, après des collaborations avec Kyobo Life Insurance et la banque en ligne Kbank.

La Jeonbuk Bank de Corée du Sud a conclu un partenariat avec la société de paiements par blockchain Ripple pour déployer son système de paiement transfrontalier à destination de ses clients professionnels.

Mardi, Ripple a annoncé que sa plateforme Ripple Payments permettrait aux clients de la banque de régler des virements internationaux en quelques secondes à quelques minutes, avec un fonctionnement 24h/24 et 7j/7. Le service cible les entreprises, notamment les sociétés d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne.

Ripple a déclaré que son système fournirait à la banque des capacités de transfert plus rapides et moins coûteuses que les virements conventionnels acheminés via des banques intermédiaires via le réseau de messagerie SWIFT, qui peuvent prendre plusieurs jours.

Les entreprises n'ont pas précisé si le service est déjà disponible pour les clients de la Jeonbuk Bank, ni identifié les corridors de paiement pris en charge, les devises, les frais ou les volumes de transaction attendus. Elles n'ont pas non plus indiqué si les transferts utiliseraient le XRP, le stablecoin RLUSD de Ripple, un autre actif numérique ou des infrastructures de règlement basées sur les devises fiduciaires.

Cet accord est le troisième partenariat de Ripple avec une institution financière sud-coréenne cette année. Ripple s'était auparavant associée à Kyobo Life Insurance pour explorer le règlement sur chaîne d'obligations d'État et avec la banque en ligne Kbank sur l'infrastructure de portefeuille institutionnel.

Cointelegraph a contacté Ripple pour plus d'informations mais n'a pas reçu de réponse avant publication.

Article connexe : Ripple investit dans Zilo et Licuido pour soutenir sa poussée vers les marchés de capitaux tokenisés

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QQuelle est la nature du partenariat entre Jeonbuk Bank et Ripple ?

AJeonbuk Bank s'est associé à Ripple pour déployer le système de paiement transfrontalier de cette dernière, Ripple Payments, à destination de ses clients professionnels.

QQuels sont les avantages principaux du système Ripple Payments selon l'article ?

ALe système permet des règlements de transferts internationaux en quelques secondes ou minutes, 24h/24 et 7j/7, et est présenté comme étant plus rapide et moins coûteux que les virements conventionnels via le réseau SWIFT.

QQuels types de clients professionnels sont ciblés par ce nouveau service ?

ALe service cible les entreprises, notamment les sociétés d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne.

QL'article précise-t-il quelle monnaie ou quel actif sera utilisé pour les transferts ?

ANon, les entreprises n'ont pas divulgué si les transferts utiliseraient le XRP, le stablecoin RLUSD de Ripple, un autre actif numérique ou des infrastructures de règlement en monnaie fiduciaire.

QCombien de partenariats Ripple a-t-elle conclus avec des institutions financières sud-coréennes cette année, selon l'article ?

AIl s'agit du troisième partenariat de Ripple avec une institution financière sud-coréenne cette année, après des accords avec Kyobo Life Insurance et la banque en ligne Kbank.

Related Reads

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit5m ago

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit5m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit6m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit6m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit25m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit25m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

TSMC Gains Another Strategic Advantage as Samsung Delays 1.4nm Process Samsung Foundry has adjusted its advanced process roadmap, postponing the mass production timeline for its 1.4nm process from 2027 to 2029. This two-year delay signals a strategic shift from aggressively pursuing the next node to focusing on maturing and scaling its 2nm platform. Samsung plans to extend the commercial lifespan of its 2nm technology through derivative versions optimized for different applications, including those incorporating backside power delivery for AI and HPC chips. A notable aspect of this shift is Samsung's cautious approach toward High-NA EUV lithography. The company views it as essential for 1nm-class nodes and beyond but not as an immediate necessity for 1.4nm, opting instead to refine its existing Low-NA EUV-based processes. This highlights a broader industry trend where the competition is evolving beyond simply reaching the next node. Success now depends on achieving high yield, managing soaring costs, integrating new transistor architectures like GAA, and delivering a compelling overall package of performance, power efficiency, and area (PPA) at a viable cost. While Samsung consolidates its 2nm efforts, TSMC continues its advance. Its N2 node is in production, and the A16 node (post-2nm, ~1.6nm) is scheduled for mass production in the second half of 2026. A16 introduces TSMC's Super Power Rail backside power delivery technology, which is expected to deliver significant performance and power efficiency gains. TSMC's previously stated cautious stance on High-NA EUV appears validated by Samsung's roadmap adjustment. The delay underscores that the competition in leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing is entering a new phase. It is no longer just a race to smaller node numbers but a multifaceted contest involving process maturity, yield, cost, design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), and advanced packaging. Samsung aims to solidify its 2nm platform over the next three years. However, as it targets 1.4nm for 2029, the industry will be watching how far ahead TSMC and Intel have moved by then.

marsbit30m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片