Pavel Durov de Telegram responde a la designación de terrorista por parte de Rusia

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-07-30Last updated on 2026-07-30

Abstract

El fundador de Telegram, Pavel Durov, declaró que las autoridades rusas lo designaron como "terrorista" tras rechazar sus demandas de vigilancia masiva y censura en la plataforma. Rusia lo acusó de facilitar actividades terroristas al no eliminar canales utilizados por grupos extremistas y servicios de inteligencia ucranianos. Este caso ruso se suma a los desafíos legales de Durov en el extranjero. Fue arrestado en Francia en 2024 por presuntamente no moderar adecuadamente contenido ilegal, aunque fue liberado bajo restricciones más tarde. Telegram también enfrenta procedimientos legales en Australia por contenido terrorista. Durov se presenta como defensor de la libertad de expresión y la privacidad digital, criticando propuestas de verificación de edad en la UE y negándose a conceder a los gobiernos acceso a mensajes privados de usuarios.

El fundador de Telegram, Pavel Durov, declaró que las autoridades rusas lo designaron como "terrorista" después de que se negara a cumplir con las demandas gubernamentales de vigilancia masiva y censura en la plataforma de mensajería. Su respuesta pública llegó un día después de que Rusia anunciara cargos en su contra.

En una publicación en Telegram este jueves, Durov también dijo que Rusia le había prohibido "publicar información en Internet", y añadió que las autoridades "se habían confundido sobre quién puede prohibir a quién en Internet".

Fuente: Telegram, Pavel Durov

Estos comentarios llegaron un día después de que el Servicio Federal de Seguridad de Rusia acusara a Durov de facilitar actividades terroristas, alegando que Telegram no eliminó canales utilizados por grupos terroristas y servicios de inteligencia ucranianos.

El caso se basa en una investigación criminal iniciada por Rusia en febrero, cuando los reguladores acusaron a Telegram de mantener en línea cerca de 155.000 canales, chats y bots, a pesar de afirmar que violaban las leyes rusas sobre contenido extremista, terrorismo, tráfico de drogas y otras actividades ilícitas.

Relacionado: Pavel Durov dice que Telegram lanzará una billetera cripto Gram nativa

Las batallas legales de Durov se extienden más allá de Rusia

El caso ruso se suma a los desafíos legales de Durov en el extranjero. Durov fue arrestado en Francia en agosto de 2024 y sigue bajo investigación judicial por acusaciones de que Telegram facilitó actividades criminales al no moderar adecuadamente el contenido ilegal ni responder a las solicitudes de las fuerzas del orden.

Durov ha negado cualquier acto ilícito, argumentando que las autoridades francesas no siguieron el debido proceso al solicitar información a Telegram. Su arresto también impulsó una campaña respaldada por la Comunidad TON que recogió más de 9 millones de firmas en una carta abierta instando a las autoridades francesas a liberarlo.

Las autoridades francesas inicialmente permitieron que Durov regresara temporalmente a Dubái en marzo de 2025, antes de levantar por completo sus restricciones de viaje a finales de ese año.

Telegram también enfrenta nuevas presiones legales en Australia, donde los reguladores iniciaron esta semana procedimientos judiciales alegando que la plataforma no eliminó contenido relacionado con el terrorismo.

Durov se ha presentado a sí mismo como un defensor de la libertad de expresión y la privacidad digital. En abril, advirtió que la aplicación de verificación de edad propuesta por la Unión Europea podría allanar el camino para una vigilancia en línea más amplia. Ese mismo mes, culpó a supuestas filtraciones de datos fiscales por una ola de secuestros relacionados con criptomonedas en Francia y dijo que Telegram abandonaría el país antes que conceder a las autoridades acceso a los mensajes privados de los usuarios.

Revista: Una hoja de ruta cuántica impulsaría mucho más a Bitcoin: Charles Edwards

Strategy's Reserve Turns a $1 Billion Profit Due to Bitcoin Price Increase

Strategy's bitcoin reserve, held by Michael Saylor's company, has moved into profit due to a surge in the cryptocurrency's price. The firm's unrealized gains now exceed $1 billion. On August 21, Bitcoin's price soared above $76,000 for the first time since late May, marking a 21% weekly increase. Strategy holds 840,447 BTC with an average purchase price of $75,385, representing a total investment of $63.36 billion since 2020. At a current price of approximately $76,700, the value of the reserve has reached $64.46 billion, exceeding its cost by about $1.1 billion. This marks a sharp turnaround from less than a month prior, when the company reported a Q2 loss of $8.2 billion, almost entirely driven by unrealized losses from bitcoin, which was valued around $60,000 at the end of June. To maintain financial stability, Strategy had resorted to selling some bitcoin and bolstering its US dollar reserves. However, CEO Fong Le stated in early August that the company plans to resume its bitcoin accumulation strategy later this year.

cryptonews.ru6m ago

Strategy's Reserve Turns a $1 Billion Profit Due to Bitcoin Price Increase

cryptonews.ru6m ago

Bitcoin price exceeds $77,000, marking a three-month record high

The price of Bitcoin (BTC) has surpassed $77,000, reaching its highest level since May 26. The leading cryptocurrency gained 8% in just 24 hours and 23% over the past week. The total market capitalization has risen to $2.58 trillion, with a 24-hour trading volume of $144 billion, according to Coinmarketcap data. Amid this rapid market surge, exchanges liquidated positions worth a total of $1.22 billion from 150,000 traders in a single day. Of this amount, $1.04 billion came from short positions. Experts previously interviewed by RBC-Crypto forecasted that if Bitcoin enters the $75,000–$78,000 range, it could pave the way for a move toward $80,000.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Bitcoin price exceeds $77,000, marking a three-month record high

cryptonews.ru7m ago

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

The article argues that as tokenization frameworks for Real-World Assets (RWA) mature, the ability to issue assets is becoming less of a competitive advantage. The focus is shifting to what happens *after* issuance: which RWA operations can build enduring trust, maintain stable operations, and remain integrated into the financial ecosystem over the long term. The piece introduces the concept of a **Reserve Layer**—infrastructure that connects tokenized assets to the necessary verification, liquidity, and operational systems for on-chain finance. For an asset to serve as a reliable reserve (e.g., short-term U.S. Treasuries, gold), it needs predictable value, standardized features, deep markets, and observable pricing. However, the true, hard-to-replicate advantage lies not just in the underlying asset but in the **operational track record** built over time. This includes consistent reserve management, independent audits, successful redemptions, maintained liquidity, and protocol integrations. Each successful operation adds evidence, creating a reinforcing cycle: more evidence builds stronger institutional confidence, leading to wider distribution, deeper liquidity, and more use cases as collateral. The article presents a framework combining two dimensions: an asset's suitability as a reserve and the issuer's operational capability. The most sustainable model combines **high-quality reserve assets with strong, long-term operational discipline**. A critical blind spot is an asset with high reserve suitability (like gold) issued by an entity with a limited operational track record; the quality of the infrastructure is separate from the quality of the asset itself. In conclusion, the next phase of RWA will be defined by participants who can pair appropriate reserve assets with the operational rigor to support them through market cycles, thereby transforming tokenized RWAs into durable financial infrastructure.

marsbit11m ago

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

marsbit11m ago

Artemis: Why We Are Bullish on Circle?

Artemis argues that the market underestimates Circle (CRCL) due to three key drivers: 1) The stablecoin market is expected to grow at a 40% CAGR, reaching over $1 trillion by 2030 and has decoupled from crypto price cycles. 2) Winner-takes-most dynamics, driven by liquidity and network effects, protect incumbents like Circle (USDC) and Tether, making it difficult for new entrants like the Open Standard Alliance's OUSD to gain significant share. 3) The market misprices Circle as a mere "stablecoin issuer" reliant on interest income, rather than a "full-stack money platform" with growing payment network and blockchain revenue streams. The recent 17% drop in CRCL's price following the OUSD announcement represents a market overreaction, in Artemis's view. Historical precedent and the inherent challenges of large consortia suggest OUSD poses a limited threat to Circle's dominant position. Looking ahead, if USDC captures 20% of a $1T stablecoin market with a 2% interest rate, it could generate $4B in interest revenue. Combined with projected growth from the Circle Payments Network and the Arc blockchain, total revenue could reach ~$5B by 2030. As Circle diversifies its revenue away from pure interest dependence, its valuation multiple should expand from the current ~6.7x P/S to a more justified 10x, supporting a potential $50B market capitalization.

marsbit11m ago

marsbit11m ago

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

Researchers have demonstrated a novel attack, dubbed ToolLeak, that can easily compromise AI coding assistants like Claude Code. The method exploits a "mode gap" by stealing the system prompts (instructions) not through direct chat queries, but by tricking the model into leaking them as parameters during tool calls. This extracted information is then used to craft a "two-channel prompt injection" attack. Attackers register a malicious tool with a description formatted to mimic legitimate instructions, prompting the AI agent to call it. The tool's return value then instructs the agent to execute a malicious command (e.g., `curl | bash`), achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE). In tests against six major AI programming tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Trae) using older versions, all were fully compromised, with attack success rates reaching up to 1.0. Notably, Claude Code's secondary guard model (Haiku) was overridden by the main model (Sonnet), which had been manipulated by the injected instructions. Newer versions show improved defenses. Claude Code and Cursor implemented mitigations like "progressive tool description exposure," reducing RCE success to 0 and 0.3 respectively in some configurations. However, tools like Cline, Windsurf, and Trae paired with certain models remained fully vulnerable. The research underscores that architectural isolation is crucial for defense, as long as tool return values can ambiguously function as both data and executable instructions, the threat of tool hijacking persists. The paper "TIPExploit: Tool-Invocation Prompt Extraction and Exploitation in AI Coding Agents" has been accepted at ISSTA 2026.

marsbit14m ago

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

marsbit14m ago

Trading

Spot

Pavel Durov de Telegram responde a la designación de terrorista por parte de Rusia

Abstract

Las batallas legales de Durov se extienden más allá de Rusia

Related Questions

Related Reads

Strategy's Reserve Turns a $1 Billion Profit Due to Bitcoin Price Increase

Bitcoin price exceeds $77,000, marking a three-month record high

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

Artemis: Why We Are Bullish on Circle?

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

Trading

Hot Categories

Hot Tags