WEMIX表示攻击者在合约漏洞后转移了约724,000美元资产

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-07-27Last updated on 2026-07-27

Abstract

区块链网络WEMIX表示,一名攻击者在获取其稳定币WEMIX$相关合约的所有权后,未经授权发行代币并转移了价值约72.4万美元的USDC.e。异常交易发生在周日UTC时间9点17分,攻击者发行了约523万枚WEMIX$,并兑换为30,736枚WEMIX和724,198.27枚USDC.e。随后,USDC.e被跨链至以太坊和BNB智能链,兑换为包括以太币和USDT在内的资产,并分散到多个地址。 WEMIX称部分资金已存入中心化交易所,已识别攻击者钱包并请求交易所及稳定币发行方冻结资产与协助,部分交易所已冻结相关地址。公司已暂时暂停所有连接其Layer-1网络WEMIX3.0的跨链桥,以及受影响流动性池的交易,并撤回了基金会提供的流动性,暂停了WEMIX$模块和PNIX去中心化交易所等服务。 事件原因和全部影响仍在调查中,初步数据可能变动。

Layer-1 区块链网络 WEMIX 表示,一名攻击者在获得其稳定币 WEMIX$ 相关合约的所有权后,未经授权发行代币,并转移了约724,000美元的 USDC.e 代币。

根据WEMIX的初步事件更新,异常交易发生在周日世界标准时间9:17。攻击者发行了约523万枚WEMIX$,并将其兑换为30,736枚WEMIX和724,198.27枚USDC.e。随后,这些USDC.e被桥接到以太坊和BNB智能链,兑换成包括以太币和Tether的USDT在内的资产,并分发到多个地址。

WEMIX表示,部分资金已存入中心化交易所。该公司已识别出攻击者的钱包地址,并请求交易所和稳定币发行商冻结资产并提供协助,同时补充说一些交易所已经冻结了与该事件相关的地址。

该公司已暂时暂停所有与其Layer-1网络WEMIX3.0连接的桥接服务,包括Chainlink CCIP和PLAY Bridge。同时,它暂停了受影响流动性池的交易,撤回了基金会提供的流动性,并暂停了包括WEMIX$模块和PNIX去中心化交易所在内的多项服务。

WEMIX表示,事件原因和全部影响仍在调查中,并警告初步数据可能发生变化。

Cointelegraph已联系WEMIX以获取更多信息,但尚未立即得到回复。

相关:在市场低迷和黑客活动创纪录的背景下,DeFi TVL在2026年下降39%


Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWEMIX 网络中发生了何种安全事件?

AWEMIX 网络的一个与 WEMIX$ 稳定币相关的合约所有权被攻击者非法获取,导致攻击者在未授权的情况下增发了大量 WEMIX$ 代币,并将其兑换转移。

Q攻击者通过此漏洞盗取了多少资产?具体是哪些?

A攻击者共计盗取了价值约 724,000 美元的资产。具体包括:通过增发并转换 WEMIX$ 代币,获得了 30,736 枚 WEMIX 代币和 724,198.27 枚 USDC.e 稳定币。

QWEMIX 团队在事件发生后采取了哪些应对措施?

AWEMIX 团队采取了一系列紧急措施:1. 识别攻击者钱包并请求中心化交易所及稳定币发行商冻结相关资产。2. 暂停了所有连接其主网 WEMIX3.0 的跨链桥和受影响流动性池的交易。3. 撤回了基金会提供的流动性,并暂停了 WEMIX$ 模块和 PNIX 去中心化交易所等服务。

Q攻击者将盗取的资产进行了何种后续操作?

A攻击者将盗取的 USDC.e 通过跨链桥转移到以太坊和 BNB 智能链,然后兑换为以太坊(ETH)、泰达币(USDT)等其他资产,并将这些资产分散到了多个不同的地址。其中一部分资金被存入了中心化交易所。

Q关于此事件的详细情况和最终影响,目前是否有定论?

A目前没有最终定论。WEMIX 表示,事件的根本原因和全部影响仍在调查中,并警告说初步公布的数据未来可能会发生变化。

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit44m ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit44m ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of LAYER (LAYER) are presented below.

活动图片