年初以来SOXL涨了225%,半导体ETF却几乎没动,这差距有点意思

投研日志Published on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

半导体ETF今天收在4378点,涨了0.51%,基本就是原地踏步。

半导体ETF今天收在4378点,涨了0.51%,基本就是原地踏步。但你翻翻它的成分股,完全是另一番天地:

SOXL(三倍做多半导体的那个):年初至今 +225.51%

USD(ProShares的做多半导体ETF):+58.94%

FTXL(富达那只):+76.35%

DRAM相关的品种:+96.52%

说白了,整个板块是靠杠杆产品和个别票硬拉起来的。反观英伟达那边的杠杆ETF,NVDL和NVDU才涨了4%出头,跟存储方向的票一比,寒气逼人。

DRAM这玩意儿年初到现在快翻倍了——这也正好撞上了半导体圈最近吵得最凶的话题:NAND价格还能不能接着涨?

想看清楚这轮行情到底是谁在带队,可以去moomoo的"投资主题"里把成分股拉出来,把60日涨幅和年初至今放一起比,比瞎猜靠谱。

但话说回来,杠杆品种涨这么多,说明行情已经跑了一大截。三倍杠杆这东西,涨起来爽,跌起来也疼。

现在AI硬件股被市场拿着放大镜看估值,这周还有英特尔和特斯拉的财报等着落地。接下来就看存储这块是继续扛旗,还是开始松劲了。

+225%是过去式,不是未来式。

还在车上的朋友,你们觉得DRAM还能拿吗?还是说这趟车已经挤得快要超载了?

Related Reads

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手1h ago

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片