CPI数据即将公布,以太坊“分叉”势在必行,空仓是否可以进场

币圈一级市场阿生Published on 2022-08-09Last updated on 2022-08-09

Abstract

从6月份开始,加密资产的行情都受到美联储加息政策的影响,而且这个影响还特别大。

从6月份开始,加密资产的行情都受到美联储加息政策的影响,而且这个影响还特别大,接下来两天又是一个关键的时间窗口,本周三,美国最新一起CPI数据将公布,这是美联储最重要的一个加息参考指标,我今天看到的消息是9月再加息75个基点的概率是67%。其实,加多少不是关键,关键是有没有迹象现实CPI已经见顶,如果CIP见底,美联储政策就会调整,甚至结束紧缩政策,这相当于给全球的资本市场松绑。

关于这一点,马斯克是认为,通胀已经见顶,机构也普遍认为,美国本月通胀率将从9.1%的水平放缓。

当然,关键还是要看数据,只要CPI出现降低,低于9.1%,我估计市场多头就会猛炒一波,毕竟大家都要吃饭,市场也太平缓了,零星的利好就会被放大。

因此,短期行情走势,我认为本周大概率会继续反弹,周三以前维持震荡,数据公布,如果利多,就会快速突破,吃饭行情还继续,大家多些耐心。

长期的趋势,相对而言,估计就会很复杂。前两天,美国非农就业人口增加了52.8万人,是今年2月以来的新高,而这个指标是美联储和白宫判断经济是否衰退的重要指标,强劲的就业预示着衰退的可能性大大降低了,但马斯克却认为“接下来,我们还将经历 18 个月的衰退”,虽然马斯克这个家伙,在币圈的声誉不太行,但是他的观点,参考性还是很强,去年11月,他就一直在谈今年3月后估计会出现金融危机,比特币也正好是哪个时候见顶的。

对此,很多市场分析人士也认为,事实上美国的经济已经处于技术性衰退了。这也反映出宏观经济走势的复杂性,物价的下行也是一个复杂、漫长的过程,不可能一蹴而就,机构也普遍预测,鉴于第二季度生产率增长可能再次为负,加上强劲的非农就业报告显示,过去三个月工资增长再次加速,潜在通胀率可能在4%左右。即使明年整体通胀率下降,核心CPI可能会在未来几个月回升。

面对这种不确定性,从宏观层面就决定了金融市场也好,加密资产也好,很难有趋势性的大行情,这也是我为什么认为熊市还需要折腾很长一段时间的原因,整个加密圈,上半年,挤压了不少泡沫,流动性被洗出去不少,资金机构非常脆弱,大河无水小河干,在宏观经济形势没有出现明显好转迹象之前,我是认为大行情可能性非常低。

这个情况下,一堆由镰刀组成的分叉大军,能有啥好结果,我是看不到,最终大概率也是要归零。所以,分叉币我是建议大家不要碰,免费的糖果可以撸一撸,拉一波就要跑,投机性太强了,搞不好,偷鸡不成蚀把米。

不过这个分叉,对ETH确实有影响,对LDO这些锁币的平台也有影响,原因是,根据规则,STETH啥的,肯定是不能空投到糖果的,不仅是stETH不行,任何第三方的发行的xETH都不行,那大家就会赎回自己的ETH,等待分叉,这可能又会形成一轮挤兑,CRV、LDO等,都会面临这个问题,甚至一些交易所与ETH流动性挖矿相关的产品。对ETH短期是个利好,应该可以刺激一波需求,但我总觉的这个影响会很小,到时候,我们再跟踪一下。

就市场本身而言,除了不温不火的利好,利空也不少。

据悉,DeFi 数据分析平台 DeFiLlama ,从8月5日起,强制关闭了重复计数,导致DeFi 总锁仓量骤降 220 亿美元,这等于是撕掉了很多DeFi的遮羞布。

排名第一的以太坊:默认显示的总锁仓量为 390.8 亿美元;开启“双重计数”后提高为 582.1 亿美元,大约灌水 191 亿美元。排名第五的 Solana ,默认显示的总锁仓量为 19.8 亿美元,开启“双重计数”后提高为 25.8 亿美元,约灌水 6 亿美元。

我估计solana的水分还远不止这点,去年 11 月,它的总锁仓量(TVL)一度突破百亿美元,前几天被爆一对兄弟档在该生态匿名创建了 11 个协议,由于高达数十亿美元在两个协议之间重复计算,Saber 及 Sunny 在 Solana TVL 达到高峰时 时占据了 75 亿美元,水分大约有7成……,成了当之无愧的币圈灌水大师,据说这哥俩现在现在正打算转战Aptos……

哎,这让后期公链们的故事都不太好讲了,从这个角度,solana的艰难时刻,估计还远没有到,正如我上一期所说,这个币种短期可能会反弹,但长期更艰难的时候估计还没有。

这也提醒我们,参与热点的操作可以,但是千万别太把数据和信息太当真,把短期的炒作当成是长期的价值,这也正是大多数韭菜被深套的原因。

我经常说,人造风景终难久,独木不知归大盘,假的就是假的,在熊市都会一一暴露出来,经过熊市洗礼的项目,反而在后期,会迎来长远的发展。

这就是所谓的,不可胜在己,可胜在敌。

在我们的交易中,也是如此,先要让自己立于不败之地,确保本金安全,然后明显的机会出现,或者主力犯错,我们才能果断介入,获得好的结果。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit7m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit7m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit14m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit14m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News15m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News15m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片