Президент Польши ветировал законопроект о крипторынке из-за «угрозы свободам граждан»

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-09-01Last updated on 2025-12-02

Навроцкий заблокировал регулирование, сославшись на угрозы свободам граждан.
Критика касается блокировки доменов, высоких сборов и чрезмерной сложности закона.
Министры обвинили президента в создании «хаоса» на рынке.

Президент Польши Кароль Навроцкий наложил вето на законопроект о регулировании криптоактивов, сославшись на риски для гражданских свобод, бизнеса и рыночной стабильности. Решение вызвало резкий политический конфликт между противниками документа и его сторонниками.

Представители криптосообщества поддержало вето, тогда как часть правительства выступила с критикой.

Prezydent RP @NawrockiKn odmówił podpisania ustawy o rynku kryptoaktywów.

‼️ Zdaniem Prezydenta, zawetowane przepisy realnie zagrażają wolnościom Polaków, ich majątkowi i stabilności państwa. https://t.co/ZBXaZg5uQI pic.twitter.com/27n7gpAayF
— Kancelaria Prezydenta RP (@prezydentpl) December 1, 2025

В заявлении администрации говорится, что закон включал положения, позволяющие государству быстро блокировать сайты, связанные с цифровыми активами. Президентская канцелярия отметила, что механизм блокировки доменов непрозрачен и может использоваться злоупотреблением.

По мнению Навроцкого, такая практика создает угрозу правам пользователей и не соответствует европейским примерам более умеренного надзора.

Критика президента также касается масштабности законопроекта. Администрация заявила, что излишняя сложность снизит прозрачность правил и фактически приведет к чрезмерному регулированию по сравнению с Чехией, Словакией или Венгрией. Навроцкий отметил, что перегрузка нормами может вытеснить бизнес в соседние страны и снизить привлекательность Польши для криптокомпаний.

Отдельной проблемой президент назвал размер надзорных сборов. По его словам, эти положения могут замедлить развитие стартапов и создать преимущество для крупных иностранных корпораций и банков. Глава государства подчеркнул, что такая конструкция ограничивает конкуренцию и ухудшает условия для местных компаний.

«Это извращение логики, которое убивает конкурентный рынок и представляет серьезную угрозу инновациям», — сказал он.

Решение о вето вызвало негативную реакцию со стороны ряда министров. Глава Минфина Анджей Доманьский обвинил президента в создании «хаоса». Он заявил, что часть пользователей уже несет убытки из-за мошенничества на рынке.

Kolejna zawetowana ustawa. Tym razem wbrew klientom i inwestorom rynku kryptoaktywów oraz 🇵🇱 podmiotom. Już teraz 20% klientów traci swoje pieniądze w wyniku nadużyć na tym rynku. Chcieliśmy ich chronić, Prezydent wybrał chaos i bierze pełną odpowiedzialność za swoje działania.…
— Andrzej Domański (@Domanski_Andrz) December 1, 2025

По его словам, отказ от регулирования может привести к дальнейшим потерям для граждан. Вице-премьер Радослав Сикорский также критически высказался, отметив, что закон был предназначен для защиты поляков от рисков криптовалют.

Представители отрасли, включая экономиста Кшиштофа Пеха, выразили противоположную позицию. Они указали, что действующие механизмы правоохранительных органов не зависят от принятия законопроекта.

Кроме того, эксперты отметили, что регламент MiCA начнет действовать во всех странах ЕС с 1 июля 2026 года. Это, по их мнению, обеспечит единый стандарт защиты инвесторов.

Вопрос о будущем польского регулирования крипторынка остается открытым. Теперь парламенту предстоит решить, будет ли законопроект переработан или повторно вынесен на голосование.

Напомним, мы писали, что в Туркменистане легализовали криптосферу.

Singapore Bets on AI Advantages as Hong Kong Lures Fund Managers with Tax Cuts

Singapore is leveraging its access to cutting-edge AI technology from both the US and China, including models from firms like Moonshot and DeepSeek, to attract and retain investment managers. This strategy positions the city-state as a neutral hub amidst US-China tech competition. In contrast, Hong Kong's primary draw is a proposed tax exemption scheme for fund managers, family offices, and private equity specialists, though proprietary trading firms like Jane Street are currently excluded. While Hong Kong's tax incentives could lower costs, industry experts note that Singapore's superior access to advanced AI tools is a critical long-term advantage, especially for quantitative funds reliant on complex algorithms. This technological gap is reportedly prompting some Hong Kong-based quant funds to consider moving key research operations to Singapore. The competition highlights how financial centers are increasingly competing through both fiscal policy and technology access, with firms weighing lower taxes against superior tech infrastructure.

cryptonews.ru10m ago

Singapore Bets on AI Advantages as Hong Kong Lures Fund Managers with Tax Cuts

cryptonews.ru10m ago

Bitcoin ETFs Lost Nearly $390 Million Over the Week, While SOL ETFs Attracted New Capital

Between August 10 and 14, 2026, the US spot Bitcoin ETF sector experienced a significant net outflow of $389.71 million, according to SoSoValue data. Outflows were recorded on four of the five trading days, primarily affecting major funds like Fidelity's FBTC ($153.23M outflow) and BlackRock's IBIT ($78.96M outflow). While Grayscale's BTC and Morgan Stanley's MSBT saw inflows, most Bitcoin ETFs ended the week with outflows or neutral flows. The spot Ethereum ETF sector also saw a net outflow of $2.26 million for the week, led by BlackRock's ETHA. In contrast, several altcoin-based ETFs attracted new capital. SOL-ETFs led with an inflow of $10.26 million, followed by funds tied to HYPE, XRP, LINK, and HBAR. DOGE-ETFs were an exception with a minor outflow. Activity in the Hong Kong market remained minimal. This follows a week where over $1 billion flowed into various crypto funds.

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Bitcoin ETFs Lost Nearly $390 Million Over the Week, While SOL ETFs Attracted New Capital

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Crypto Adoption in the EU Stalls: ECB Finds Only 0.2% of Online Payments Use It

The European Central Bank (ECB)'s latest survey on cash use by eurozone companies reveals a very low adoption rate for cryptocurrencies in the region. The survey of 8,205 firms found cash remains the most widely accepted payment method at physical points of sale (92%), followed by cards (88%). Mobile payments grew significantly from 36% in 2024 to 68% in 2026. However, digital assets have minimal penetration: only 0.2% of businesses accept crypto or stablecoins for online purchases, rising to just 1% at physical stores. This is far below adoption levels in emerging markets. The ECB emphasized the need to prevent growing payment automation from undermining cash's viability. Despite acknowledging crypto's potential benefits like reduced intermediaries and fees, financial institutions have been slow to implement systems. Consequently, European payment operators have yet to capitalize on the regulatory clarity provided by the full implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. An Elliptic policy head noted MiCA now allows operators to confidently develop compliant crypto payment solutions for the European market.

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Crypto Adoption in the EU Stalls: ECB Finds Only 0.2% of Online Payments Use It

cryptonews.ru12m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, is reportedly projecting its revenue could reach between $190 billion and $200 billion by 2028, according to sources cited by Reuters. This forecast, significantly higher than its reported $47 billion annual run-rate in May 2026, is being used by investors and bankers to value the company ahead of a potential IPO. Anthropic has confidentially filed with the SEC, with listing details dependent on market conditions and regulatory approval. The valuation reportedly applies a revenue multiple (EV/Revenue) to these future 2028 figures, an approach common for high-growth tech firms but unusual for a forecast two years ahead of an IPO. This reflects confidence in Anthropic's rapid scaling; its annual run-rate grew tenfold yearly for three years leading into 2026, jumping from ~$9B in late 2025 to over $47B by May 2026. Investors are betting the company's massive spending on GPUs, model training, and infrastructure will eventually outpace costs, leading to expanding margins. Public companies like Palantir, Cloudflare, and SpaceX, valued at high multiples of their forward revenue, serve as benchmarks. While this forward-looking method has precedents, some analysts question the sustainability of such valuations and the actual productivity gains from AI. Despite these concerns, earlier reports suggested Anthropic could be valued at over $1 trillion for its IPO.

cryptonews.ru13m ago

Media: Anthropic Aims for Revenue Up to $200 Billion by 2028 Ahead of IPO

cryptonews.ru13m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed

Business of Open Blockchain: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed In public blockchains, user transaction fees do not simply become "revenue" for a single entity. The flow of money is complex and protocol-dependent. In Ethereum, fees consist of a base fee (burned, permanently removing ETH from circulation) and a priority tip (paid to the validator). In Solana, half the base fee is burned and half goes to the validator, while priority fees go entirely to validators. Thus, "fees" are not synonymous with "project revenue"; they may go to network operators or be destroyed. Foundations like the Ethereum Foundation do not take a cut of user fees. They are funded by their own treasuries, which can generate income (e.g., from staking rewards) and finance ecosystem development, research, and security. Their role is to fund public goods that are hard to monetize directly. Developers of open-source blockchain code can monetize through services, not the code itself. For example, Optimism provides its technology freely but sells enterprise support and managed services (OP Enterprise). Additionally, networks built on Optimism's tech, like Coinbase's Base, share a portion of their revenue with the Optimism ecosystem via agreements, creating an economic link. Token holders do not automatically receive fees as dividends. In Optimism, a portion of protocol revenue is now used to buy back and treasury-lock OP tokens, creating an indirect link between network usage and token economics. In Ethereum, fee burning reduces ETH supply but doesn't distribute funds to all holders; stakers and validators receive direct rewards. For evaluation, analysts should look beyond total fee figures. Key questions are: Who paid and for what? Where did the money go (to validators, operators, treasury, or burning)? What were the recipient's costs? Is there a mechanism linking this income to the token? The same fee amount impacts different blockchain economies in vastly different ways depending on these factors.

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Open Blockchain Business: Who Gets the Fees and Why a Foundation is Needed