Celsius token records double-digit gains despite lending platform turmoil

FinboldPublished on 2022-07-04Last updated on 2022-07-04

Abstract

In the last 24 hours, the token has gained by over 16% to trade at $0.86 by press time on July 4.


Cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius’ ongoing controversies regarding the sustainability of the business appear to have little impact on the network’s native token Celsius (CEL) which has soared despite the general crypto market volatility. 

In the last 24 hours, the token has gained by over 16% to trade at $0.86 by press time on July 4, just three weeks after the company announced a pause on customer withdrawals. Elsewhere, the weekly chart shows that CEL is up 7%, according to CoinMarketCap data.


CEL 7-day price chart. Source: CoinMarketCap Triggers of Celsius rally 
The latest CEL gains are partly an impact of the network’s community that leveraged social media platforms to drive a short squeeze rally as part of supporting the troubled lender. According to community members, the aim was to drive up CEL to force close short sellers’ positions.
Celsius troubles emerged on June 13 after the company halted customer withdrawals, stating that it needed time to stabilise liquidity and operations. The decision emerged after the CEL token dropped over 60% in mid-May. 
With the cryptocurrency market crashing, businesses such as Celsius have taken a hit due to a credit crunch. Notably, other crypto lenders including Babel Finance, CoinFlex, Voyager Digital Ltd. and Finblox have taken the same course as Celsius by pausing withdrawals. 
Deepening troubles
In recent days, the Celsius troubles have deepened after the company reportedly fired about 150 employees. Interestingly, the firing report comes just days after the company issued a statement, reassuring its community of working on withdrawals and fixing its liquidity problem.
“Our relationship with the community and our clients has been a source of pride for all team members at Celsius, and we will continue to share information with our customers as and when it becomes appropriate,” the firm said. 
Additionally, the company has resorted to hiring restructuring lawyers alongside pausing interacting with community members through platforms like Twitter spaces. 

Reports also emerged that the Celsius CEO, Alex Mashinsky attempted to flee the U.S. but was stopped by local authorities. However, the team has since denied the reports. 
Finbold also reported that Celsius was marketed as a less risky platform than a bank offering better returns. In reality, Celsius had more risks than a traditional bank. 

Related Reads

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

The report analyzes five Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure stocks—Micron (MU), MaxLinear (MXL), AMD, Lumentum (LITE), and Vicor (VICR)—as distinct plays within the AI capital expenditure chain, rather than a single "AI trade." While all benefit from AI data center spending, they differ in their specific roles (e.g., memory, computing, optics, power, connectivity), financial resilience, and risk profiles. The author argues that the key question is not whether the AI narrative remains intact, but whether capital expenditure translates into real orders, earnings justify valuations, and portfolios can withstand high volatility. Historical data shows these stocks have significantly outperformed benchmarks but also experienced deeper drawdowns (~28% to -32%), highlighting their high-beta, high-volatility nature. An investment framework is proposed: core positions (e.g., MU, AMD) for stocks with stronger fundamental evidence; satellite positions (e.g., LITE, VICR) for high-potential, high-volatility names; and cautious observation (e.g., MXL) for smaller-cap ideas with unproven financials. The emphasis is on disciplined, phased buying during pullbacks—only when price corrections align with intact fundamentals and available risk budget—rather than emotional "buy-the-dip" strategies. Overall, AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but success requires strict position sizing, role definition for each holding, and preparedness for significant volatility.

marsbit1h ago

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

marsbit1h ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: - According to reports, Standard Chartered Bank has published a research report on Uniswap, setting a 2030 price target of $100 for the UNI token. - The bank's core logic is that the tokenization of assets will drive demand for open DeFi liquidity, and Uniswap could capture significant trading volume and fee revenue. - However, most institutional-grade tokenized products are permissioned, and the example of BlackRock's BUIDL shows that DeFi still faces significant access barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 target for UNI by 2030 is based on the hypothesis that tokenized assets will grow massively and a significant portion will flow into open DeFi markets, requiring decentralized exchange platforms like Uniswap for liquidity. The bank forecasts tokenized assets could reach $4 trillion by 2028, with up to 30% in DeFi by 2030. The key question is whether tokenized assets like treasuries and funds will trade in open, decentralized markets or remain within closed, permissioned institutional systems. This directly impacts Uniswap's potential growth. A real-world example is BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which, while using UniswapX for trading, is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This highlights the current trend: institutions may leverage DeFi infrastructure but maintain strict control over access and transfers. Furthermore, for UNI's value to rise significantly, Uniswap must establish a clear value-capture mechanism, such as the approved fee switch and token burn proposal. Regulatory and interoperability hurdles also persist, as noted by bodies like the Financial Stability Board. In summary, Standard Chartered's bold prediction hinges on the future flow of tokenized asset liquidity. While it signals institutional recognition of DeFi's potential, the path to $100 depends on overcoming current permissioned models and enabling truly open, cross-asset liquidity pools on platforms like Uniswap.

Foresight News1h ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

Foresight News1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, observing World Cup trends favoring strong teams, and noting the continued strength of Japanese and Korean stocks. He highlighted Anthropic's potential for a massive future IPO and the defensive investment logic in "picks and shovels" AI infrastructure. Qin Xiaofeng discussed trading HYPE around $56-$70, viewing the $50-$60 range as long-term support due to Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain traditional asset trading and its substantial fee revenue used to buy back HYPE. On ETH, he noted a divide between disappointed crypto natives and bullish traditional investors like Tom Lee, personally viewing current ETH prices as undervalued.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片