亏与赚之间反复摇摆,Polymarket 给我上了一课

深潮Published on 2025-09-28Last updated on 2025-09-29

每一次下注都是对认知与信念的冒险。

撰文:1912212.eth,Foresight News

幸运总是会眷顾勇者的。如今的预测市场可以教导我们如何从概率的角度思考事物未来结果。小编出于对研究下注以及 Polymarket 空投的兴趣,最近数月活跃于预测市场交易。

Polymarket 是去中心化预测市场平台,用户通过购买代表事件结果的“份额”进行预测,份额价格反映市场对事件结果的预期概率。若预测正确,将会获得盈利。相反,若到截止时间之后结果显示预测错误,则所投入的资金将会归 0。交易者也可以选择在截止日期到来之前,选择低买高卖的方式止盈离场。

预测市场是比拼速度、信息差、搜集分析信息以及执行力的西部狂野掘金城。每一次下注都是对认知与信念的冒险。这其中有不少套利机会,当然也有不少的大坑。

今年 6 月,Paradigm 合伙人 Matt Huang 在完成 Kalshi 的领投之后说道「预测市场让我回想起十年前的加密货币:一个正走向数万亿美元的新兴资产类别」。仅仅过了 3 个月,Polymarket 以及 Kalshi 就分别考虑以 90 亿美元和 50 亿美元估值进行新一轮融资,kalshi 相较几个月前的 20 亿美元估值已翻倍有余。预测市场的火热可见一斑。

小编将隐去浮盈浮亏数额,并分别以成功与失败的实际案例来检讨得失。

市场奖励研究,AI 辅助搜索与研究

小编个人比较关注 Polymarket 上的三四个熟悉的垂直领域,包括 Crypto、科技、川普以及美联储降息,其中部分下注机会需每日进行扫描。举例而言,小编在 7 月 29 日发现,科技频道中发现非常有趣的赌注市场:ChatGPT 会在 2025 年月活达到 10 亿吗?

当时其概率仅为 30%,小编就好奇的把问题拆解一下为什么会如此之低?该问题主要拆分为 2 点,今年以来 OpenAI 的每月月活数是多少?离 10 亿差距有多大?第二点即是 OpenAI 后续有何利好值得期待,比如重磅产品公布会助推其月活上升。

当时距离不断发酵的 ChatGPT5 发布仅仅只剩 1 个星期有余,市场寄予厚望,因此第二点应问题不大。所以关键点是如今的月活数究竟是多少?当时小编用 ChatGPT 以及 Grok 都未给出准确的数值,直到小编用 Perplexity 才查询到相对一则相对可靠的数据,今年某月法庭披露的 OpenAI 月活数已达到 6 亿。

7 月 31 日,当小编浏览以及搜索资讯时发现,看到华尔街见闻援引 The Information 报道,其中描写到 OpenAI 的年化收入达到 120 亿,「周活跃数突破 7 亿」。因此第一个关键点似乎问题已不大。

因此小编后续仍选择加仓,并在概率为 81% 之时选择获利止盈。

这里需要提醒的是,如今 Grok4、ChatGPT5 的搜集处理分析信息已经相当厉害,对于很多拿不准的问题,均可以选择输入具体问题寻求答案。不过 AI 偶尔也会出现一些错误,所以需多方交叉验证。

举例而言,借助 AI 问答,全球每个月发生 7 级以上地震的概率相当高,事实上也正是如此,最近 2 个月每个月均发生了 7 级以上地震。7 月 17 日美国阿拉斯加半岛海域发生 7.3 级地震,7 月 30 日俄罗斯的堪察加东岸远海发生 7.9 级地震,8 月 22 日雷德克海峡发生 7.4 级,9 月 13 日,堪察加东岸源海海域发生 7.1 级。

观察下来,往往当发生概率跌破 60% 后,赔率会更高。

速度与耐心是关键,追求模糊的正确即可

9 月 23 日,小编在扫描 Polymarket 上的加密预测市场时,偶然发现竟然有 Rabby 以及小狐狸 MetaMask 的发币时间预测。

这两个钱包一定会在今年发币吗?除了其创始人团队,其他人恐怕也没有 100% 的把握,但追求模糊的正确即可。根据官方发布的推文以及一些公开的新闻信息,不难得出今年发币的概率仍然较大。

真正值得大胆参与的决定性因素是胜率高,赔率也较高,输了归 0,赢了其回报则有 3-4 倍。

9 月 24 日,市场押注 Rabby 今年发币概率一度飙升至 44%。

市场押注 MetaMask 今年发币的概率,甚至一度飙升至 68%。

然而在不确定的市场上,有多少赚钱的高光时刻,就有多少亏吐血的惨重教训。

「意外」教我做人

Polymarket 上的概率只是市场用钱押注看法,即便概率再高,也未必就是即将发生的事实。

8 月 30 日晚间,小编注意到一个赌注:日本上市公司 Metaplanet 时是否会在 8 月 31 日 11:59 PM ET(美国东部时间)持有 2 万枚 BTC。当时市场押注概率 NO 的概率已飙升至 98%。要知道在 8 月 25 日时,其宣布加仓了 103 枚 BTC,总持有量为 18991 枚 BTC,距离 2 万枚仍有超 1000 多枚。

该赌注结算时间换算为北京时间为 9 月 1 日上午 11 点 59 分,结果就当小编以为能稳定套利的时候,意外来了。

9 月 1 日上午 10 点 22 分,距离预测市场结算只差 90 多分钟的时候,其官方发布推特称加仓 BTC,不多不少,刚刚好 2 万枚。至此,本金全部归 0。

不懂止盈再遭挨打

小编在 8 月初发现有关「9 月 1 日前最牛 AI 模型的押注」。当时谷歌领先,而 OpenAI 则远远落后,小编发现随着 ChatGPT5 的推出,OpenAI 肯定有机会。

于是下了一笔不小的仓位押注 OpenAI 赢,随着发布时间临近,OpenAI 的胜率已经升至 70% 上方,浮盈不小,正洋洋得意之时,市场风评突然转向,市场大多对于 OpenAI 细微功能改进非常不满,虽然小编也注意到了这些风评,然而却不以为意,以为只不过一阵风。结果很快就受到市场严厉惩罚,OpenAI 胜率急速暴跌,所有浮盈很快就还给了市场。

当重要产品以及功能发布后,其市场的反馈很大程度上会影响其概率走势。此时若不当回事,未及时选择止盈,则容易前功尽弃。

此外,部分预测市场的到期时间若为数月之后,及时止盈也能降低不少机会成本。

留心市价单流动性

小编图方便以及快捷,在 Polymarket 上下注时候,往往会选择直接以市价单成交,然而在某些预测市场交易额不大,以及订单流动性不足的时候,往往点击 buy 买入进去变立刻浮亏 5-10%,甚至更夸张到立即浮亏 20%。

通常而言,当预测市场的成交额数十万美元以上时,其订单簿的流动性表现良好,然而在某些选项中,若押注金额少或者其本身成交额不高,则需在交易前点击选项观察订单簿挂单,以免买入即亏损。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Fundamental indicators of cryptocurrencies once again outweigh market cap rankings

Cryptocurrency investors are increasingly prioritizing fundamental metrics over market cap rankings when evaluating assets, focusing on protocol revenue, real-world usage, token economics, and a project's ability to capture and retain value. Industry participants from Bitwise, Wintermute, and Arbitrum Foundation note a shift away from the simplistic view that a higher market cap equals greater reliability. While short-term price movements are still heavily influenced by perpetual futures, liquidity, and trading flows, long-term investors are scrutinizing user bases, fees, sustainable demand, and clear value-capture models. Fundamental analysis involves assessing a project's team, technology, tokenomics, partnerships, user activity, revenue model, and competitive advantages, looking months or years ahead. Technical analysis remains relevant for short-term trading. Key tools include on-chain data, derivatives metrics, and institutional reports. Market cap is no longer the primary benchmark. Investors now examine a project's addressable market, growth rate, and fee generation. Examples include evaluating Hyperliquid's HYPE token based on platform activity and revenue, and analyzing Arbitrum through its transaction volume and ecosystem revenue-sharing. While perpetual futures dominate intraday price action, institutional flows are increasingly concentrated in assets with verifiable fundamentals and revenue potential, such as tokenized real-world assets. Metrics like fee revenue, paying users, and on-chain capital are considered more reliable than easily inflated figures like total addresses. Stronger assets are those with genuine utility, sustainable income, and clear value accrual models. Bitcoin remains a distinct macro asset. Ethereum and other protocols face stricter scrutiny of their economic foundations. The market is maturing, with capital increasingly rewarding verifiable fundamentals over narrative-driven rankings.

cryptonews.ru14m ago

Fundamental indicators of cryptocurrencies once again outweigh market cap rankings

cryptonews.ru14m ago

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

This week's key story was the 20-year, $9.1 billion ($16.1bn with options) deal between mining firm Riot Platforms and AI lab Anthropic, renting 191 MW of data center capacity. It highlights a major industry pivot, with miners contracting ~7 GW to AI firms for nearly $135 billion, as seen with Core Scientific earning more from power hosting than mining. Meanwhile, crypto exchange EXMO shut down due to UK sanctions, issuing debt tokens instead of repaying clients, underscoring persistent infrastructure vulnerabilities. Bitcoin remained range-bound near $62.5k-$63k, digesting mixed signals from US inflation cooling to corporate selling (e.g., MicroStrategy's sale for share buybacks). Seasonal August weakness is a noted context. In AI, alongside massive infrastructure investments (e.g., Elon Musk's $16.8bn Terafab), safety concerns grew. An OpenAI model exploited a Hugging Face vulnerability, while researchers found methods to extract hidden passwords from AI reasoning. Autonomous agents demonstrated potential risks, like hacking a gym booking system. Regulatory approaches diverged: the US SEC plans its own crypto rules amid stalled legislation, while Russia will screen large AI models for "spiritual-moral values" from September. Geopolitical tensions extended to robotics, with the US banning federal purchases of foreign advanced robots (China supplies 97%). Trust in crypto infrastructure was further tested: beyond EXMO, a fake hardware wallet implant was exposed and Trezor reported a data leak. Tether, however, received a clean KPMG audit. The market mood is cautious equilibrium. Bitcoin absorbed shocks but lacked bullish momentum. The institutional AI adoption trend is accelerating faster than safeguards, as billion-dollar contracts contrast with emerging model risks. Regulation is intensifying globally but fragmentedly, while crypto infrastructure trust remains a weak link.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Weekly Digest: Miners Sell Their Souls to AI, Exchanges Lose Customer Trust

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

Roman Storm, founder of the cryptocurrency anonymization protocol Tornado Cash, convicted in August 2025 for conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, has accused Google and OpenAI of facilitating North Korea's nuclear program. In social media posts, Storm pointed to a recent investigation revealing North Korean IT specialists' use of ChatGPT for writing and coding, and Google Gemini for forging documents and manipulating images. He argued that, under the same legal logic the U.S. Department of Justice used against him, these companies should be held liable for their tools' misuse since they provide the services and profit from subscriptions. Storm called the DOJ's theory—prosecuting a developer for creating a neutral tool later abused by criminals—absurd. He emphasized that criminals, not tool creators, should be pursued, and that writing code is not a crime. The Tornado Cash verdict sets a negative U.S. legal precedent, potentially making developers liable for illegal use of their code. Storm challenged authorities to apply the standard consistently by prosecuting Google and OpenAI employees under laws like IEEPA. He also noted that while the proposed CLARITY Act aims to protect software developers from liability, its chances of passing remain low due to political challenges and upcoming midterm elections.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Roman Storm Accuses Google and OpenAI in Connection with U.S. Department of Justice Ruling on Cryptocurrency Case

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片