BONK’s on-chain strength vs. dipping price – What’s going on?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-20Last updated on 2025-09-21

Key Takeaways

Why did BONK’s price drop despite rising activity?

Spot Taker CVD showed consistent selling, while Futures traders stayed neutral, keeping BONK’s price under bearish pressure.

What supports BONK’s long-term upside potential?

Nearly 1 million holders, 25% launchpad share, and higher burn rates suggested BONK could recover if demand aligns with shrinking supply.


Bonk [BONK] rebuilt itself by introducing a utility feature to work around the dwindling attention. The hype around BONK had faded with the emergence of AI in the creation and trading of crypto tokens.

However, the introduction of the LetsBONKfun platform, which serves as a Solana [SOL]-based launchpad, brought about a significant turnaround.

It attracted institutional collaboration, like the integration of USD1, allowing the use of the stablecoin as a base pair.

The activity on the network surged, despite price action not responding with similar zeal. What are the indications of this surging chain activity?

Activity surges, impact on its tokenomics

The Solana Post reported BONK holders neared 1 million, with fewer than 20,000 left. It indicated a growing community, particularly after launching the LetsBONKfun platform.

The Fed had cut rates, and post-FOMC profit-taking had taken place. Thus, smart money remained glued to the potential of BONK.

Stalkchain showed BONK was the most accumulated token by smart money in the last 24 hours, with nearly $250,000 flowing in. That’s ahead of Jupiter [JUP], Coinbase’s cbBTC, and others.

BONK supply was reducing day by day, thanks to the burn mechanism generated by the platform’s revenue.

bonkbonk

Source: Blockworks

DefiLlama data confirmed revenue share to burning rose from 35% to 50%, while LetsBONKfun collected $20.9 million in fees and $12.57 million in revenue annually. BONK’s supply declined daily, tightening tokenomics.

That shift set up BONK to grab 25% launchpad market share, while Pump.fun [PUMP] still led with 65% .

Despite these positive on-chain data points, the price action of BONK was struggling. Well, what is causing this outcome?

Why is the BONK price struggling?

BONK reflected what was happening in most cryptocurrencies post the FOMC rate cuts. The memecoin was down about 5% at press time, despite impressive 69% gains in the ongoing third quarter of the year.

The structure had invalidated bearish sentiment after breaking above a key trendline. However, the On Balance Volume and MACD indicators hinted at underlying bearish sentiment in the short term.

bonkbonk

Source: TradingView

That left traders focused on Spot Taker CVD. CryptoQuant data showed most spot traders sold, pushing the price lower. By contrast, Futures Taker CVD stayed neutral, signaling weak derivatives demand.

bonkbonk

Source: CryptoQuant

Chain activity and token burns supported BONK’s fundamentals.

Nearly 1 million holders suggested longer-term confidence, but short-term pressure came from active spot selling. A renewed spike in demand may be needed to lift prices.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片