Ethena Bids for Hyperliquid Stablecoin with BlackRock Fund

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-09-09Last updated on 2025-09-09

Ethena Labs is competing to issue Hyperliquid’s new native stablecoin, USDH. They have put in a proposal that they are being backed by BlackRock. Ethena’s offer, which was made public on September 9, 2025, puts it in competition with other big names like Paxos, Frax Finance, Agora, and Sky for a key role on the decentralized exchange, which is growing quickly.

The proposal suggests backing the new stablecoin, USDH, with USDtb, a tokenized note collateralized by BlackRock’s BUIDL fund. 

Ethena’s official proposal details a plan to return 95% of all net revenue to the Hyperliquid community and includes a commitment of $75 million in incentives to support market development. Key partners in the bid include institutional custody firm Anchorage Digital and tokenization platform Securitize.

Hyperliquid’s move to introduce a native stablecoin follows its announcement on September 5 and aims to replace the $5.5 billion in USDC currently used for settlement on the platform. The exchange has grown a lot, and in August, the volume of perpetual contract trading reached an all-time high of $405.8 billion. According to DefiLlama, the protocol makes over $1.3 billion a year, which makes the stablecoin contract a very valuable reward.

The financial implications are substantial. Omar Kanji of Dragonfly estimated the transition could generate an additional $220 million in annualized revenue for holders of Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE. He also projected the move could reduce the circulating supply of Circle’s USDC by as much as 7%, representing a significant shift in the stablecoin landscape.

The competition for Hyperliquid’s stablecoin issuance is a major event in decentralized finance, highlighting a battle for a significant and stable revenue stream on one of DeFi’s leading platforms. By being backed by BlackRock, the company shows how the future is being shaped between institutional and digital finance.

 A community vote and a gas auction will decide the final choice. This is a very important test for decentralized decision-making in high-stakes financial relationships, where the result will decide both the ecosystem’s future and set parameters for this disruptive partnership.

Also Read: Hyperliquid to Launch USDH Stablecoin Ticker Post Validator Vote


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3h ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片