加密早报:白宫将惩罚歧视加密公司的银行,Bullish 向美国证交会提交 IPO 申请

深潮Published on 2025-08-04Last updated on 2025-08-05

SharpLink Gaming增持18,680枚以太坊,总持有498,884枚。

作者:深潮 TechFlow

昨日市场动态

WSJ:白宫准备发布行政令,惩罚对加密公司和保守派人士存在歧视的银行

据华尔街日报报道,白宫正准备加强对大型银行的施压,针对其被认为存在的对保守派人士和加密货币公司的歧视行为,拟发布一项行政命令,威胁对因政治原因拒绝服务客户的银行处以罚款。

华尔街日报获得的一份行政命令草案指出,该命令将指示银行监管机构调查是否有金融机构违反了《平等信贷机会法》、反垄断法或消费者金融保护法。

彭博社:美 CFTC 正考虑允许期货交易所开展加密货币现货合约交易

据彭博社报道,美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)正在探索允许注册期货交易所上线包括以太坊和比特币在内的杠杆数字资产交易。

CFTC 代理主席 Caroline Pham 表示,该机构可以立即实施一个明确简单的解决方案。CFTC 已要求公众在 8 月 18 日前就在 CFTC 注册的期货交易所开展加密资产现货合约交易提供意见。

高盛:预计美联储9月起将连续三次降息25个基点

据金十数据报道,高盛表示,“我们预计美联储将从 9 月份开始连续三次降息 25 个基点;如果下一份报告中失业率进一步上升,则可能降息 50 个基点。”

PeckShield:CrediX遭攻击损失约450万美元

据PeckShield监测,CrediX今日遭受安全漏洞攻击,黑客通过盗用一个具有多重管理权限的管理员账户实施攻击。该账户拥有资金池管理、跨链桥、资产上架、紧急处置等多项权限。

攻击者主要利用跨链桥(BRIDGE)权限进行操作,导致资金池资产流失约450万美元,其中包括铸造无抵押的acUSDC代币。

此前消息,CrediX官方已确认安全事件,称正在进行调查,将尽快公布详细信息。

Lido 联创:将缩减贡献者团队规模,约 15%的员工会受影响

Lido 联合创始人 Vasiliy Shapovalov 上周末在社交平台表示:“为确保长期可持续发展,Lido Labs、Lido 生态系统及 Lido 联盟艰难决定缩减贡献者团队规模,约 15%的员工将受影响。此决定与工作表现无关,纯粹是出于成本考量。这是一个艰难的决定,但它是基于长期韧性的考量。尽管在市场上行期间做出这样的决定看似有悖常理,但此举体现了我们对可持续增长、运营聚焦以及与 LDO 代币持有者利益保持一致的坚定承诺。Lido 正为未来数十年发展布局,而此次调整将有助于巩固这一根基。”

区块链借贷公司 Figure Technology 已提交 IPO 申请

据 The Information 报道,区块链借贷公司 Figure Technology 已秘密提交 IPO 申请。

Bullish向美国证交会提交IPO申请,拟募资6.29亿美元

据Axios报道,数字资产交易所Bullish及其子公司CoinDesk已向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交首次公开募股(IPO)申请。根据申请文件,Bullish计划发行2030万股,发行价区间为28-31美元/股,最高募资金额为6.29亿美元,对应公司估值约42亿美元。

Bullish业务范围包括数字资产现货交易、杠杆交易和衍生品交易,同时为稳定币发行机构提供流动性服务。财务数据显示,该公司2025年第一季度数字资产销售额达8020万美元,净亏损3.49亿美元。Bullish曾于2023年以7260万美元收购加密货币媒体平台CoinDesk。

Barry Silbert 回归 Grayscale 担任董事会主席,推动公司上市进程

据 Theblock 报道,Grayscale Investments 宣布创始人 Barry Silbert 回归担任董事会主席,接替 Mark Shifke,后者将继续留任董事会成员。此举正值 Grayscale 准备推进上市计划,公司上月已提交保密形式的 IPO 文件。Silbert 曾于 2023 年底卸任董事会主席,彼时正值 SEC 审议其 GBTC 转换为现货比特币 ETF 的关键阶段,同时其母公司 DCG 因 Genesis 破产及 Gemini Earn 项目问题遭纽约总检察长起诉,Silbert 亦被点名。

DeFi Dev增持超11万枚SOL,总持有量超129万枚

据官方公告,DeFi Dev 宣布已增持 110466 枚 SOL,平均购买价格为 166 美元,总计 1840 万美元,当前总持有量达到约 1,293,562 枚,价值约合 2.09 亿美元。

The Ether Machine增持10,605枚ETH,总持仓量超34.5万枚

The Ether Machine今日宣布,其子公司The Ether Reserve LLC以平均价格3,781美元增持10,605枚ETH。此次增持是该公司长期积累战略的一部分,资金来源为此前9700万美元私募所得。

自本月初以来,The Ether Machine购买和承诺的ETH总量已达345,362枚。该公司计划通过质押、再质押等方式运营这些资产,并为机构提供以太坊基础设施服务。

SharpLink Gaming增持18,680枚以太坊,总持有498,884枚

据链上分析师 Onchain Lens(@OnchainLens)监测,SharpLink Gaming(股票代码:SBET)今日再次增持18,680枚以太坊,价值约6,663万美元。此次增持后,该公司以太坊储备总量达到498,884枚,总价值约18亿美元。

行情动态

推荐阅读

被遗忘的WIF,注意力经济下的meme币生死法则

本文讲述了关于加密货币meme币WIF(Dogwifhat)的兴衰故事,揭示了注意力经济下meme币的生存法则。WIF曾因一张戴粉色针织帽的柴犬照片爆红,市值突破数十亿美元,但随着市场热度下降、社区信任危机以及项目失败,最终走向衰落。文章强调在Web3时代,被遗忘才是真正的死亡。

中本聪雕像沉入湖底,“欧洲加密之都”的焦虑浮出水面

本文讨论了瑞士卢加诺市试图通过“Plan B”计划成为“欧洲加密之都”的努力,并以中本聪雕像被扔进湖里的事件为切入点,分析了该城市在推动加密货币生态系统发展中的挑战与局限。文章指出卢加诺的加密战略更多依赖行政推动和资金支持,而缺乏自然生长的社会土壤,这可能导致加密议程难以持续。

Ray Dalio 桥水基金 50 周年对话:从地下室到华尔街,痛苦与反思铸就投资传奇

本文纪录了Ray Dalio在桥水基金50周年庆典上反思了公司的发展历程和个人职业生涯。他分享了痛苦与反思的哲学如何塑造桥水的独特文化和投资理念,同时强调了有意义的工作和关系的重要性。这次对话回顾了桥水从地下室起步到成为全球最大对冲基金的旅程,并展望了未来的发展方向。

新 Hotcoin,从“工具提供者”到“价值共建者”

本文介绍了加密货币交易平台Hotcoin的品牌全面升级计划,重点阐述了其从“工具提供者”向“价值共建者”的战略转型。此次升级涵盖视觉优化、功能升级以及用户体验提升,旨在构建一个更安全、透明、支持性强的全球加密资产交易平台。

泡沫周期下的 Crypto 估值与融资:一场关于 timing 的人生游戏

本文围绕加密货币行业中的融资与估值展开讨论,分析了不同类型的风险投资(VC)的角色、融资轮次对估值的影响、泡沫周期理论以及市场环境对项目估值的影响。此外,文章强调了“好的时机胜于一切”的重要性,并通过多个案例和观点探讨了加密行业中的投资逻辑及其不确定性。

Related Reads

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbitHá 14m

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbitHá 14m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHá 54m

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHá 54m

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHá 1h

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片