贾跃亭进军Web3:造车不如发币?

marsbitPublished on 2025-07-23Last updated on 2025-08-01

在资本的江湖里,有些人负责赚钱,有些人负责兑现,而贾跃亭,似乎永远只负责提供话题。“下周回国”的承诺或许遥遥无期,但他总能在中国网友的段子和他美股投资者的悲报之间,找到一个全新的、令人瞠目结舌的叙事支点。

法拉第未来

当法拉第未来(Faraday Future, FFAI)的股价在1美元的生命线上苦苦挣扎,当全世界都在用数数的方式来衡量其造车伟业(截至2025年中,累计交付13辆)时,贾总又一次不负众望,抛出了一个让华尔街和加密圈都感到既荒诞又好奇的“新剧本”:全面进军Web3。

2025年7月,一纸公告将法拉第未来与一家名为HabitTrade的全球经纪商绑定在一起,宣称要“加速进入Web3金融生态系统”,并“解锁资本市场的新可能性”。消息一出,市场瞬间陷入一种熟悉的困惑。一家连最基本的汽车量产都举步维艰的公司,为何要一头扎进一个概念比车轮还飘忽的Web3世界?这究竟是又一次濒临绝境下的“生态化反”故事新编,还是贾跃亭为我们准备的另一场资本魔术?

要看懂这场戏,我们不能只看法拉第未来说了什么,更要看它请了谁来一起“搭台唱戏”。


精心挑选的“金融工程师”

这次合作的另外两个主角,HabitTrade和RWA Group,并非泛泛之辈,他们的背景恰恰揭示了贾跃亭的真实意图。

法拉第未来

HabitTrade,法律实体注册在开曼群岛,表面上是一个移动端券商,但其里层早已为加密世界的“大户”们打通了使用稳定币(如USDT)出入金的隐秘通道。更关键的是,它有成功案例。此前,它曾帮助另一家中概股公司优品车(U-Power)完成了“代币-股权整合”。这相当于它向贾跃亭递上了一份履历,上面写着:你想要的那些“出格”操作,我这里有现成的说明书。

而另一位合作伙伴RWA Group,则更是点睛之笔。这家总部位于香港的公司,前身是“NFT中国”,其核心专长是“真实世界资产(Real World Assets, RWA)代币化”。简单来说,它的工作就是扮演一位“数字资产架构师”,通过法律和技术手段,将现实世界里那些非标准的、缺乏流动性的资产,转化为可以在全球区块链上自由交易的数字代币。

当一家连新车都被质疑“抄袭”的汽车公司,找到了一位深谙加密资本运作的离岸掮客,和一位精通资产“数字化”的金融工程师,这出大戏的轮廓便清晰了起来。贾跃亭想要的,可能根本不是在传统金融的框架内再进行一次痛苦的融资。他要做的,是绕开华尔街的规则,直接向一个全新的、更狂野的资本大陆——Web3世界,兜售一个全新的故事。


从“PPT造车”到“代码造资产”

这个新故事的核心,就是RWA代币化。而故事的原材料,正是发布会上那个被许多人忽略的关键数字:10,034份付费预订单。

对于目前的法拉第未来而言,其资产负债表上最值钱的东西是什么?是加州汉福德那座产能始终存疑的工厂吗?显然不是。是那十几辆已交付的、单车亏损惊人的FF 91吗?也远远不够。

它最值钱的,就是这些刚刚到手的、热气腾腾的未来收入凭证。在传统金融世界里,这些预订单只是未来的或有收入,很难直接变成今天的现金。但在RWA的世界里,一切皆有可能。

在RWA Group这样的专业公司操刀下,法拉第未来完全可以将这10,034份预订单打包成一个资产池,然后发行代表其未来收益权的代币。这些代币可以通过HabitTrade的平台,卖给全球的加密货币投资者,而投资者则用他们手中海量的稳定币来支付。

这套操作的精妙之处在于,它创造了一个看似完美的闭环:用法拉第未来“卖出汽车的承诺”,来资助它“制造汽车的现实”

这本质上是一种基于区块链技术的未来收入证券化,但它比传统方式更灵活、更全球化,也更能吸引那些信奉“高风险高回报”的加密投资者。这群投资者,他们或许对汽车工业的市盈率毫无兴趣,但对一个“Meme股鼻祖+Web3”的颠覆性叙事,却可能抱有极大的热情。这让人不禁想起德国工业巨头西门子在区块链上发行数字债券的尝试,但贾跃亭的构想显然更为激进——西门子是在为真实的业务融资,而法拉第未来,更像是在为“未来的业务”融资。


一场“双线作战”的叙事管理

当然,如果仅仅把这看作一次融资尝试,那就低估了贾跃亭作为“叙事大师”的段位。从7月16日宣布获得中东投资人领投的1.05亿美元融资,到18日发布新车,再到紧接着宣布进军Web3,这是一套环环相扣的组合拳,是一次巧妙的“双线作战”,试图同时讨好两个截然不同的群体。

对内,他向那些饱受股价下跌折磨的忠实散户股东喊话。新融资、新车型、过万的订单,以及公告中承诺的“为股东提供HabitTrade平台的独家优惠”(被市场普遍解读为可能进行“代币空投”),这一切都是在注入强心针,旨在将这批最核心的支持者,更紧密地团结在“反抗卖空者”的战车上。

对外,他则用一套纯正的加密“黑话”向Web3世界发出邀请。公告中充斥着“基于稳定币的投资”、“原生数字资产流动”、“去中心化社区”等词汇。这无异于在说:嘿,各位加密世界的朋友们,我懂你们的语言,也愿意按你们的规则来玩。欢迎用你们的钱,来投资一家在纳斯达克上市的“Web3概念车企”。

这种策略的核心,是将其不断恶化的基本面(2024财年运营亏损高达1.497亿美元)和备受争议的产品设计,归咎于“非法卖空”和“市场操纵”等外部邪恶势力。通过塑造这种“我们对抗他们”的对立情绪,法拉第未来成功地在其支持者心中建立了一道心理防线,让他们更愿意相信,公司一切非常规的自救行为,都是为了“释放被低估的真实价值”。


结局会是奇迹还是闹剧?

那么,贾跃亭的Web3新剧本,最终会导向何方?

最有可能的短期结果,是一场“Meme股”式的狂欢。通过新车、新融资、Web3叙事和潜在的代币空投,FFAI的股价可能会在投机情绪的推动下迎来一波暴涨,暂时缓解退市危机,并为公司争取到又一次宝贵的喘息之机。

但从中长期来看,这条路充满了巨大的不确定性。最大的风险来自监管。美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对数字资产的鹰派立场众所周知。一旦法拉第未来发行的RWA代币被认定为“未注册的证券”,随之而来的将是毁灭性的法律诉讼和巨额罚款。届时,这场Web3的救赎之旅,可能瞬间变为通往破产的快车道。

归根结底,所有的金融创新和叙事构建,最终都要回归到最朴素的商业本质。正如方舟投资的“木头姐”凯茜·伍德(Cathie Wood)在评论特斯拉时所强调的,颠覆性创新的核心在于“执行力”。无论故事讲得多么天花乱坠,无论引擎盖上的屏幕多么炫酷,如果法拉第未来不能在汉福德的工厂里,稳定、高效地生产出能让消费者满意的汽车——并且解决其与“高山9”之间的知识产权疑云——那么一切基于“未来”的代币化,都将是无源之水、无本之木。

贾跃亭的这场Web3实验,更像是一次现代资本市场的行为艺术。它完美地融合了一位传奇企业家的不屈、一家陷入困境公司的挣扎、传统金融的局限以及加密世界无限的可能性。

这辆驶向Web3的战车,究竟会将贾跃亭和他的信徒们带向应许之地,还是仅仅在元宇宙的荒原上留下一道绚丽而短暂的烟尘?在下一批汽车交付数据公布之前,或许没人能给出答案。但可以肯定的是,只要贾跃亭还在牌桌上,这场大戏就永远不会缺少观众。

Related Reads

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

Morgan Stanley analyst Joshua Meyers' report (June 21, 2026) highlights key trends in the hardware and semiconductor sector ahead of Micron's earnings. The core takeaways are: 1. **Micron & Memory:** Memory remains a high-conviction long theme, driven by strong AI demand and rising ASPs. However, investor focus is shifting to the sustainability of Micron's >80% gross margins and the specifics of potential new long-term supply agreements (SCAs). 2. **Hardware Supply Chain:** AI-related demand for servers, networking, and storage remains robust, but company performance is diverging. Celestica (CLS) shows improved margin confidence, Western Digital and Seagate benefit from pricing, Fabrinet (FN) sees predictable AI optics growth, and Teradyne (TER) anticipates a new Google customer. 3. **AI Capex & WFE Forecasts:** JPMorgan increased its Wafer Fab Equipment (WFE) market growth forecasts to 28% in 2026 and 29% in 2027. AI infrastructure financing is evolving, with higher project-level debt reducing constraints on capex expansion. The report signals that while the AI-driven hardware cycle is strong, the market is entering a phase focused on execution verification (e.g., Micron's SCA details, Fabrinet's ramp with Amazon) and valuation sustainability. Key near-term signals include Micron's guidance, Arista Networks' outlook, and the pace of demand normalization post potential tariff-related pull-ins.

marsbit8h ago

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

marsbit8h ago

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

Report Analysis: Federal Reserve's New Chair Debut – A New Captain, But the Same Script? Morgan Stanley's chief global economist Seth B. Carpenter analyzes the first FOMC meeting under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh in a June 21 report. Warsh deliberately avoided providing forward guidance on interest rates, aligning with his philosophy. However, market expectations for a rate hike this year were reinforced. Key signals lie elsewhere: inflation may fall more than expected, and quantitative tightening (QT) could be more aggressive than anticipated. The FOMC's "dot plot" suggests only one rate hike in 2026. Carpenter argues that if inflation undershoots forecasts, the logic for even a single hike weakens, especially as projections indicate potential rate cuts in 2027. On QT, Warsh's stance is clear. Carpenter notes that measures like halving the Treasury's account balance could shrink the Fed's balance sheet by around $500 billion with minimal market impact. Combined with adjustments to reserve interest and liquidity rules, the ultimate QT scale may exceed expectations, though its market effect might be less disruptive unless the Fed actively sells Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). While Warsh initiated a review of the Fed's policy framework, the 2% inflation target remains intact for now. The report concludes that the market may be overestimating the significance of reduced forward guidance and the near-term rate hike risk, while potentially underestimating the scope and manageable nature of the coming balance sheet reduction. The key debates will hinge on upcoming core PCE data, the specifics of the QT path, and the framework review's findings.

marsbit8h ago

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

marsbit8h ago

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbit8h ago

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片