数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-07-23Last updated on 2025-07-24

Abstract

3万个钱包控制着54%的SOL总供应;120个钱包持有大于100万枚SOL;SOL流通供应量的71%正在被质押。

原文作者:Ignas,DeFi 研究员
编译|Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina
译者|CryptoLeo(@LeoAndCrypto

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


刚刚,DeFi 研究员 Ignas 撰文分析了 SOL 代币的分布情况,包括质押中的 SOL,锁仓质押的 SOL 数据,还有钱包持有 SOL 数额的比例,Odaily星球日报将其编译如下:


去年,我写了 ETH 的分布情况,Eekeyguy 制作了一个很棒的公开仪表板来检查 ETH 都存在哪里。现在轮到 SOL 了。


数据显示: 88% 的 SOL 供应量正在流通,约为 5.3817 亿枚。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


需要注意的是,Solana 的总供应量没有上限(像 ETH 一样),通胀率为 4.395% ,年通缩率为 15% ,最终通胀率应稳定在 1.5% 。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


Solscan 数据显示, 71% 的 SOL 流通供应量正在被质押。(而 ETH 为 30% 。)

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


Solanacompass数据显示, 6.7% 的 SOL 正在被锁仓质押,或为风投/团队/内部人士行为,但我无法弄清这部分 SOL 的持有人具体是谁。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


根据 Messari 数据, 99.88% 的 SOL 解锁已完成。目前“锁定”的代币仅有 60 万枚 SOL,由 FTX 持有(或已在场外交易中出售)。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


那么,Solanacompass 和 CMC 报告的 11.2% 锁仓的 SOL 代币究竟是什么呢?
机构 SOL 持有者

据 Arkham Intelligence 数据,Coinbase 持有价值 50 亿美元的 SOL,占 SOL 总供应量的 4.7% 。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


此外,还有一些机构也持有大额 SOL,数据如下:

  • 币安 - 3.97% 
  • Jito - 1.61% 
  • Upbit - 1.28% 
  • OKX - 1.19% 
  • Alameda - 0.92% (或是 Messari 提到的部分锁仓代币)
  • Marinade Finance - 0.79% 
  • Robinhood - 0.74% 
  • Kraken - 0.53% 
  • Bybi - 0.49% 
  • Jump Crypto - 0.33% 
  • Crypto com - 0.33% 
  • Wintermute -  0.14% 
  • Bitstamp - 0.13% 

总之,Arkham 可以追溯到 SOL 流通供应的 20% 数据。此外,我们还可以通过数据平台 Dune 来发现更多 SOL 持有和质押实体。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


上图显示,除了前文提到过的币安、Coinbase 外,还可以看到 Helius 拥有 3.7% 的活跃质押供应。此外 Galaxy 拥有 800 万枚质押 SOL 委托,还有 Ledger、Figment、Kiln 1、Everstake 等。但前 15 名中很多钱包都为标记。令人惊讶的是只有 6.6% 的 SOL 是来自流动性质押代币 LST,这限制了 DeFi 的增长潜力,如果 SOL 的原生质押比例再高一点,质押全部来自 LST ,Solana DeFi 生态可能会增长数十亿美元。

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


独立 SOL 持有者

下文我将通过 AI 来计算 SOL 持有者数据。(可能会出错,数据不是完全准确。)

数据揭秘:SOL都在谁手里?


根据 AI 得出的数据,持有大于 100 万枚 SOL 的钱包多达 120 个,总持有超过 1.5 亿枚 SOL;


而数额低于 1000 枚 SOL 的钱包数量超过 890 万;
平均每个钱包持有 16.8 枚 SOL(偏向少数量持有者)。


总的来看,


集中度: 0.33 % 的钱包(30220 个)控制着 54 %的 SOL 供应量(但其中包括 CEX、托管人等);
散户主导地位: 97.4 %的钱包持有少于 1000 枚 SOL,共占 24.8 %的供应量。


免责声明:本文尚在更新中,欢迎评论提供有关 SOL 现状及其所有权的新数据。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

The European Commission is exploring whether to extend the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation to cover decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing, including lending vaults. These vaults, which channel billions into on-chain credit markets, present significant regulatory challenges because their decentralized structure doesn't map neatly onto existing financial frameworks. Their legal status is currently based on non-binding interpretations that they fall outside MiCA and EU fund rules. The article uses Morpho's decentralized lending protocol as an example, illustrating how responsibilities are divided among various participants (owner, curator, allocator, sentinel), making it difficult to identify a single "provider" to regulate. Experts warn that broadly categorizing "DeFi lending" could inadvertently capture vastly different structures. They argue that any regulatory approach should focus on the specific structure and control mechanisms of a vault, rather than using decentralization as a simple dividing line, and that DeFi lending may require a dedicated, carefully crafted framework distinct from traditional finance. The Commission's consultation closes on September 30, 2026. The core challenge for regulators is not just whether to regulate DeFi lending, but how to design rules that distinguish between different forms of on-chain lending and the entities that control them.

cointelegraph1h ago

MiCA is coming for DeFi vaults, but regulation will be difficult

cointelegraph1h ago

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

Title: Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era – Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked The article argues that privacy is a fundamental, not niche, attribute of functional money. It highlights that technological shifts, like the rise of AI and stablecoins, are driving a new wave of public focus on financial privacy. Zcash, a decentralized digital currency similar to Bitcoin but with built-in privacy via zero-knowledge proofs, is positioned to address this need. Unlike transparent blockchains, Zcash offers users the option to conduct "shielded" transactions that hide sender, receiver, and amount while remaining verifiable. The report details Zcash's evolution, noting key upgrades that improved usability and security. It points to rising on-chain usage of privacy features as evidence of real demand. Currently, ZEC holds a minimal share (~0.4%) of the total crypto market cap. Grayscale suggests this reflects a market assumption that privacy is a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential market re-evaluation: if privacy is recognized as a core monetary feature in an era of enhanced surveillance, Zcash's current valuation represents significant upside potential. Key risks discussed include regulatory challenges, historical trusted setup concerns for older pools (mitigated by newer protocols), quantum computing threats, and execution risks associated with future technical upgrades. The conclusion is that while the future scale of private digital currency is uncertain, the market currently prices in little chance of its value increasing substantially, presenting a potential opportunity for investors.

marsbit4h ago

Grayscale Report: Financial Privacy in the AI Era, Why Zcash Should Not Be Overlooked?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片