从增长幻觉到现金流现实:当回购成为山寨币的集体叙事

深潮Published on 2025-07-08Last updated on 2025-07-08

生存维艰,只能用扎实的收入结构和清晰的财务行动重新赢得市场注意。

撰文:叮当,Odaily 星球日报

6 月 19 日,首席执行官兼创始人 Humayun Sheikh 宣布启动一项大规模回购计划:Fetch 基金会将联合多家交易所和做市商,共同推动总额达 5000 万美元的 FET 代币回购行动。这背后,是其代理平台与 ASI-1 应用需求持续增长所带来的底层支撑。「FET 当前被市场低估。」他直言。

这场回购计划并非孤例,而是在过去数月中山寨币赛道愈发明显的趋势。资金正源源不断流向 BTC,ETH 也在近期重新获得巨鲸和机构的青睐,但山寨币市场交易量骤减、投资者情绪疲软,项目方们仿佛进入了集体的「生存艰难模式」:在融资变难、估值缩水的大背景下,如何活下去、如何讲出一个还能被相信的故事,成了摆在每一个项目面前的共同课题。

而代币回购,正在成为越来越多项目的共同回答。

生存叙事下的回购逻辑

如果说牛市的主旋律是「增长故事」,那么熊市讲的则是「现金流实力」。代币回购,正是这一逻辑的自然延伸:用项目自身的资金回购流通中的代币,一方面减少市场抛压,稳定币价;另一方面,也是一种对外宣示,「我们依然有能力、有信心。」

在这个过程中,回购不只是市场操作,更是一种财务层面的「自证」机制。只有当一个项目拥有足够的收入和储备,才敢把真金白银拿出来「赌」自己的未来。对于投资者而言,这种行为本身就是对项目价值的背书。

但也正因为此,真正能持续回购的,往往只是一小部分项目。多数项目只能将「回购」挂在治理提案或路线图里,最后不了了之。回购机制如何设计、是否销毁、是否锁仓固然重要,但最核心的永远是:你有没有真实、稳定、可持续的收入。

Fetch.ai 的回购计划,缘起于其 ASI-1 和代理平台的使用激增。平台价值在上涨,代币价格却停滞不前。5000 万美元的资金来自基金会储备,这笔钱或许不足以改写 FET 的价格曲线,但重要的是,如果计划落地,它会打破市场对项目「现金流匮乏」的固有印象。

谁在下场回购?

在 2024 年后,多个老牌项目就相继启动甚至已经执行了回购计划。尽管回购的方式有所不同,但背后的动机高度一致:用现金流撬动信心杠杆。

2025 年 4 月 9 日,Aave 回购提案以 99.63% 的支持率通过。该提案的完整计划是在未来 6 个月内每周回购 100 万美元,首期回购于 4 月 10 日开始执行。自启用协议费用回购机制以来,Aave DAO 已持续执行每周 100 万美元的回购计划。最新数据显示,协议累计已花费 1000 万美元回购 5 万枚 AAVE,平均成本价为 199.74 美元。按当前 264 美元市价计算,该部分国库储备已产生约 300 万美元未实现收益。这不仅是一种资本操作,也体现了 Aave DAO 治理结构下的执行力与现金流健康状况。

另一边,Sky (前身是 MakerDAO)联创 Rune 目前转入回购地址的 200 万枚 USDS 已全部用于回购 SKY。从 6 月 4 日起,Rune 累计已使用 233 万枚 USDS 回购 3022.7 万枚 SKY,约占其流通量的 1.4% ,回购均价约为 0.077 美元。

2 月 14 日,Jupiter 宣布所有协议费用的 50% 将用于回购 JUP 并锁定三年,回购于 2 月 17 日正式开始。截至目前 JUP 回购价值约 2500 万美元。

Hyperliquid 自 3 月 20 日启动回购,将其平台收入的 50% -100% 用于回购 HYPE 代币,其中大部分回购的代币会被销毁,以减少流通量。根据回购数据显示,过去 30 天内,其回购金额达到 5500 万美元左右,平均每天回购金额可达到 183 万美元,依据此数据计算,季度回购可达 1.65 亿美元,按照 HYPE 现在的价格 37 美元计算,回购数量约为 446 万枚,占其流通量(3.33 亿枚)的 1.3% 左右。

从 TokenTerminal 数据来看,Sky 年收入达到 3.1 亿美元左右,在稳定币赛道,年收入仅低于 Tether 和 Circle。当然,从收入规模来看,中心化稳定币和去中心化稳定币之间仍然是有不可跨越的鸿沟。Aave 过去一年收入则在 1 亿美元左右,位居借贷赛道榜首。

从 defillama.com 数据来看,Jupiter 年化收入则在 3000 万美元左右。值得注意的是,Hyperliquid 虽然是新兴 DeFi 项目,但是过去一年收入已经达到 3.2 亿美元。如此体量,在 DeFi 圈层的潜力非常巨大,详情可阅读《总交易量 1.5 万亿美元登顶链上合约王座,Hyperliquid(HYPE)是下一个 SOL?》

结语

代币回购并非灵丹妙药,但在信心稀缺的周期里,它确实是一种有效的叙事切入口。与其继续靠空洞的「愿景」「路线图」「赋能」,不如用扎实的收入结构和清晰的财务行动重新赢得市场注意。

真正的比拼,已经不再是你讲了一个多大的故事,而是你能不能活着讲到它实现的那一天。

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片