SEC Vs Ripple: Expert Breaks Down 10 Crucial Updates On Settlement Progress

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-06-19Last updated on 2025-06-19

Abstract

In a recent social media update, attorney Bill Morgan provided insights into the settlement process between Ripple Labs and the...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a recent social media update, attorney Bill Morgan provided insights into the settlement process between Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), bringing closure to a lengthy legal battle. 

Ripple And SEC Secure 60-Day Pause

Morgan detailed the timeline and procedural steps that have led to this pivotal moment noting that the settlement agreement was signed by Ripple parties on April 23, 2025, followed by the SEC’s endorsement on May 8, 2025. 

After years of contentious litigation, both parties filed a motion to hold their appeals in abeyance, which was granted for a period of 60 days, extending from April 16 to June 16, 2025. This pause allowed the parties to negotiate the terms of their settlement without the pressure of ongoing appeals.

On May 8, the parties filed a Rule 62.1 motion requesting an indicative ruling, but their initial effort was met with a procedural setback. Judge Analisa Torres denied the motion due to a failure to address Federal Rule 60, which governs exceptional circumstances for modifying judgments. 

Undeterred, both Ripple Labs and the regulator returned to court on June 12 with a revised joint motion focused on Rule 60, seeking clarity on the terms of their agreement.

Key Ruling Expected

As the proceedings progressed, the SEC updated the Court of Appeals, requesting that the timeline for the appeal and cross-appeal remain in abeyance until June 16, aimed to facilitate negotiations and avoid unnecessary litigation. The parties obtained an indicative ruling from Judge Torres regarding their second joint motion.

If this indicative ruling is granted, the next step would involve filing a motion with the Court of Appeals for a limited remand, allowing the trial court to address the terms agreed upon by both parties. 

The culmination of this legal journey hinges on Judge Torres dissolving the permanent injunction she imposed on August 7, 2024. This ruling would permit the release of escrow funds, crucial for the settlement’s implementation.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the SEC initially resisted this trajectory, rejecting the first indicative ruling on May 15 for not adequately addressing the exceptional circumstances mandated by federal rules. 

However, the parties returned with a comprehensive 52-page memorandum arguing that ongoing litigation would waste judicial resources. They emphasized that vacating the injunction was essential for the settlement and pointed to the SEC’s recent policy shift toward negotiated resolutions in the cryptocurrency sector.

The legal landscape surrounding Ripple highlights a significant moment not only for the company but also for the broader cryptocurrency market, which has considerably gained traction among US lawmakers. 

Should the settlement proceed as planned, Ripple and the SEC aim to dismiss both the SEC’s appeal and Ripple’s cross-appeal, potentially paving the way for a more collaborative regulatory environment in the future

Ripple
The daily chart shows XRP’s price consolidating between $2.05 and $2.30. Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Ronaldo is a seasoned crypto enthusiast with over four years of experience in the field. He is passionate about exploring the vast and dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and its practical applications for achieving economic sovereignty. Ronaldo is constantly seeking to expand his knowledge and expertise in the DeFi space, as he believes it holds tremendous potential for transforming the traditional financial landscape.

Related Reads

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

Robinhood is launching its own Layer 2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and "tokenized stocks," but these are not actual equity shares. The tokens are legally structured as debt securities or derivatives, offering economic exposure to a reference stock without granting voting rights or direct ownership. This move represents Robinhood's strategy to expand from a traditional brokerage into a "financial super app," building a user-friendly, programmable financial interface on top of complex, legally compliant, and jurisdiction-specific backend structures. The company's existing business remains strong, driven by options, event contracts, and stock trading. The new blockchain and tokenization efforts are an ambitious layer of infrastructure built atop this core, aiming to make financial products more portable and globally accessible via crypto rails. Key components include the Robinhood Wallet, Bitstamp acquisition (for institutional reach), the Lighter perpetual contracts platform, and Robinhood Earn (DeFi yield). The central challenge is the "brokerage chain paradox": maintaining a simple, intuitive user experience while the underlying assets are highly structured, regulated, and legally distinct from direct ownership. The success of this strategy depends on users, developers, and regulators accepting this model. If the complexity is misunderstood or deemed misleading, it could create product liability issues and stall expansion. The initiative is a significant infrastructure play, but its long-term viability hinges on navigating this fundamental tension between simplicity and legal reality.

marsbit30m ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

marsbit30m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

Title: Zhipu, Fearing to Become the Next MiniMax In July 2026, amid the success of its coding-focused AI, Zhipu's founder, Tang Jie, issued an internal letter titled "The Giant Wave Has Come." It notably avoided celebrating recent triumphs, such as Zhipu's trillion-HKD market cap and booming MaaS revenue driven by its GLM-5.2 model in coding applications. Instead, the letter pivoted the narrative to future-oriented concepts like Long Horizon Task, Autonomous Agents, Self-Evolving systems, and AGI. This strategic shift in messaging followed the sharp devaluation of its competitor, MiniMax. After its lock-up period expired, MiniMax's stock plummeted as the market began evaluating it with traditional SaaS metrics like ARR and user growth, rather than as a frontier AI pioneer. Seeing this, Tang Jie aimed to preempt a similar revaluation of Zhipu. He fears that if the market starts viewing Zhipu primarily as a profitable "AI coding company," its valuation would become anchored to conventional financial metrics, losing the premium associated with AGI potential. Therefore, the letter reframed Zhipu's mission. While acknowledging that coding was the current commercial driver, Tang positioned Zhipu on the "infrastructure path," akin to OpenAI and Anthropic. The new focus is on developing agents capable of complex, long-term planning and autonomous operation—moving from assisting individuals (OPC: One Person Company) to automating entire organizations (NPC: No People Company). This "Touch High" plan explicitly prioritizes long-term AGI research over short-term monetization. The article frames this as a critical divergence in China's AI landscape: the "commercialization path" (exemplified by MiniMax) versus the "infrastructure path" (chosen by Zhipu). The former risks being judged harshly by internet-era metrics once growth slows, while the latter risks failing if technological breakthroughs stall. Tang Jie's letter is thus a calculated move to secure Zhipu's identity as an AGI contender, buying time before the inevitable market demand for commercial proof. The core question remains: can Zhipu's "mo gao" (reach high) plan achieve genuine technological leaps fast enough to outpace the market's diminishing patience for stories over substance?

marsbit30m ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片