以太坊三天涨超 40%,发生了什么?

链捕手Published on 2025-05-11Last updated on 2026-06-30

作者:陈铭,券商中国

 

加密货币,集体异动!

最近几天,加密货币价格大幅上涨。其中,以太坊(ETH)表现最为强劲,其在72小时内涨幅超过40%,价格一度逼近2600美元。此外,比特币、XRP、BNB、Solana、狗狗币、艾达币等加密货币,也有不错的涨幅。

有分析人士指出,加密货币近期集体上涨,跟贸易紧张局势的缓解有关。而以太坊之所以领涨,跟该币种进行的技术升级有关。

以太坊三天涨超40%

最近三天时间,以太坊大幅异动,价格一度从1811美元飙升至2597.68美元,最高涨幅达到43%,显著跑赢比特币等其他大型数字货币资产。

截至记者发稿时,以太坊的价格在2540美元附近波动,7天累计涨幅39.62%;比特币在10.4万美元附近波动,7天累计上涨8.52%。另外, 最近7天时间内,Solana累计涨幅超过21%,BNB涨超10%,艾达币涨超15%,狗狗币涨超37%。

以上数据可以看出,以太坊引领了加密货币的广泛反弹,在全球贸易紧张局势缓解和对网络升级的乐观情绪的提振下,以太坊有望创下自2021年以来的最大单周涨幅。

以太坊的反弹也反映了投资者重新关注以太坊正在进行的技术升级。5月7日,以太坊成功实施Pectra升级,引入了一系列关键技术改进。该升级引入了包括更高质押上限、账户抽象(EIP-7702标准)在内的重要改进,显著增强了以太坊网络的易用性和灵活性,该技术还可以降低网络费用。这一技术升级不仅带来了实质性的功能提升,也为投资者注入了新的信心,成为此轮上涨的重要技术基础。以太坊的这些举措,也被视为抵御来自Solana等快速增长的竞争对手的竞争所必需的举措。

另外,“逼空”行情也助推了以太坊的反弹。自5月8日起,以太坊期货市场上演了一场典型的空头挤压戏码。数据显示,自5月8日起,以太坊期货市场的空头头寸出现大规模平仓,清算金额高达4.38亿美元,远超同期多头清算金额2.11亿美元。价格的急剧拉升迫使空头交易者买入以太坊以回补仓位,进一步推高了币价,形成典型的“逼空”上涨螺旋。

与此同时,以太坊未平仓合约总价值从5月8日的212.8亿美元激增至5月10日的267.7亿美元,以太坊永续期货的每周融资利率也从0.10%上升至0.15%。这两项指标共同表明,更多交易者正在进入市场并开设新头寸,且多头交易者愿意支付额外费用维持仓位,进一步印证了以太坊期货交易者的看涨情绪。

贸易紧张局势有所缓解

从宏观层面来看,全球贸易紧张局势缓解,是本轮加密货币走强的重要原因。据央视新闻,当地时间5月8日,美国与英国达成一项新的贸易协议,部分撤回特定领域的关税,进一步扩大双方产品的市场准入。此外,当地时间5月10日上午,中美经贸高层会谈在瑞士日内瓦开始举行。

上述消息显著提振了市场风险偏好,也为包括比特币、以太坊在内的加密资产市场营造了积极的氛围。5月8日,比特币突破了10万美元大关,为自今年2月以来首次突破这一心理关口。有分析师表示,这反映出投资者对风险资产的整体需求正在回升,与此同时,美股也持续从4月低点反弹,市场风险偏好明显增强。

加密货币交易平台Nexo联合创始人特伦切夫称:“比特币周四的走势,不仅是三个月来首次重返10万美元大关,还再次证明了比特币作为‘终极反弹资产’的地位,也反映出美国贸易前景改善对市场情绪的提振。”特伦切夫还称:“比特币受到特朗普政府对加密货币友好态度的支撑,现货ETF投资者也在持续买入。”他补充称,近期市场不确定性反而助推了比特币的上涨,因为投资者开始对美元的避险地位产生怀疑,这或将继续支持比特币的走势。

加密货币交易所Kraken的全球经济学家Thomas Perfumo指出:“比特币重新站上六位数大关,正值全球市场风险情绪复苏之际。股票市场表现强劲,投资者对于配置风险资产的意愿正在增强,而这种复苏的‘动物精神’也迅速蔓延到了加密货币领域。”

近日,币圈的另外一个重大事件,是Coinbase斥资29亿美元收购Deribit,拿下全球最大数字币衍生品交易所。

据外媒本周四报道,美国加密货币交易所Coinbase已同意以29亿美元收购全球最大加密衍生品交易所Deribit,创下数字市场有史以来最大规模的并购。交易结构显示,Coinbase将支付7亿美元现金,其余部分以股票形式支付。Coinbase表示,这笔收购将加速推进该公司的全球衍生品战略。

此次收购标志着Coinbase进军利润丰厚的加密货币衍生品市场最雄心勃勃的举措。去年,Deribit的总交易量几乎翻了一番,达到近1.2万亿美元。Cantor分析师Brett Knoblauch表示:“这是历史上最大的加密货币并购交易,我们认为这对Coinbase来说是一次A+级收购。”

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit1h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit2h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片