从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-04-10Last updated on 2025-04-10

Abstract

关税策略、吉卜力化创作、AGI隐私保护、Bittensor子网项目暴涨......10大AI应用趋势正在发生。

原文作者：0x Jeff

原文编译：Tim，PANews

1.特朗普政府利用人工智能制定关税公式

如何计算关税以平衡美国的贸易逆差？

该聊天机器人建议将贸易赤字除以进口额，而这似乎正是白宫采取的做法。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

2.一切皆可吉卜力

现在大家都用 ChatGPT 来将图片吉卜力化、创作漫画故事、制作表情包，生成任何自己想得到的图像。

非艺术创作者如今也能尽情释放创造力，为其内容打造精美的艺术作品。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

3.视频生成式 AI 能力持续快速发展

Runway 刚刚推出了 Gen-4 Turbo：仅需 30 秒即可生成一段 10 秒的高质量视频

Pika Labs 推出多帧功能：可将您的照片中的最多 5 帧转换为 25 秒的视频。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

4.人工智能凭借自然发声更趋近人类

Eleven Labs 以自然逼真的声音和先进的语音克隆技术而闻名，刚刚推出了其 MCP 服务器。

你现在可以启用语音代理，自动拨打当地的披萨餐厅进行订餐。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

5.掌握如何使用 AI 已成为基本要求

Shopify 的首席执行官 Tobi Lutke 强调，人工智能已成为所有员工的必备工具（也纳入 KPI 考核）。

这表明人工智能增强工作岗位的趋势：人工智能 + 高绩效员工= 100 倍的工作效率

6.我们距离实现自主加密货币交易代理又近了一步

Co d3 x 正朝着 v 0.6 版本迈进，新增了交易模板、知识图谱、目标链，以及交易和投资组合的用户体验改进。

v 0.6 版本为 sophon 主办的 150 万美元智能体交易大赛拉开序幕。

7.个人 AGI？

Eternal AI 预告了其 v2 版「个人 AGI」，希望实现 100% 本地化运行与隐私保护，不再与中心化实体共享数据。

该团队一直致力于实现完全去中心化的人工智能，这一点从他们之前的产品中可以窥见，例如代币化的去中心化视频。

8.Vibe-coding 的热度飙升至历史新高

Vibe-coding 和无代码工具持续吸引更多用户，我们正处在一个新时代的开端，任何人都能无需编写代码即可开发 AI 应用。

不使用工具的人会被视为原始人。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

9.Vibe-coding 能力越大，责任越大

由于平台间的转换成本低，导致用户流失率极高。

当应用程序和代理表现不达预期时，若竞争对手提供更优的功能和定价方案，用户能轻易转向其他产品。

10.Bittensor 子网成为全新 PvE 游戏战场

在过去的几周里，Bittensor 的几个子网表现极为出色。

  • Gradients SN 56 ：自 3 月低点以来涨幅超 650% 

  • Chutes SN 64 ：涨幅超 120% 

  • Nova SN 68 ：涨幅超 250% 

此外，还有众多子网的表现跑赢大盘。

从关税到AGI，梳理当前10大AI应用趋势

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

TRON's Nile testnet has deployed an upgrade implementing quantum-resistant signature cryptography, a proactive step to secure its ledger against potential future decryption threats from quantum computing. This development, confirmed via official sources like nileex.io and github.com, represents a notable Layer 1 security enhancement. The report emphasizes its relevance within the current market focus on stablecoins. Crucially, the upgrade is currently active only on the testnet, not the TRON mainnet. While providing a verified data point for the market to weigh, the article cautions that this single development should be considered alongside broader market factors and does not guarantee any specific price action. It stands as a snapshot of ongoing protocol development.

bitcoinist18m ago

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

bitcoinist18m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit47m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit47m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit54m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit54m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手55m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手55m ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手1h ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow