Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-03-12Last updated on 2025-03-12

Abstract

空投奖励将分配给真正推动项目发展的成员,严打“工作室”。

原文作者:Charlie Rogers(Nillion CMO)

编译:Asher(@Asher_ 0210 

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

Nillion 资格检查器上线几周后,Nillion 团队观察到社区内外对空投资格的各种猜测。一些人感到愤怒,另一些人则很兴奋,但事实是,目前没有人真正知道最终分配情况。今天,我想澄清 Nillion 空投奖励的对象,并详细说明方法,以确保真正的社区成员能够获得奖励,而不是那些只把 Nillion Discord 当作空投等候室的“游客”。

Nillion 的空投有何不同

在深入细节之前,我先直截了当地说:“我们在做一些不同的事情。这可能会让某些人不满,但我们坚信,这种方式将成为加密项目认可其社区的新标准。”

Nillion 一直是引领者,而非跟随者。还记得率先采用的社区轮融资模式吗?后来,许多项目纷纷效仿。现在,再次树立新标准,优先回馈真正的贡献者,而不是那些只想获取利益的人。

这一切的实现,离不开核心社区的坚定支持。正是大家的投入和信念,让加密项目对社区价值的衡量方式得以重新定义。

衡量真正社区贡献

在设计空投矩阵时,Nillion 团队确定了三个主要类别:

  • 社区价值

  • 开发者和开源贡献

  • 验证者计划的参与度

这些类别旨在奖励对项目产生深远影响的贡献,包括文化贡献(如艺术、写作、设计)以及技术贡献(如 GitHub 代码贡献或基于 Nillion 构建的应用程序)。

其中,关于验证者计划,Nillion 团队的目标是展示社区驱动隐私的力量,并且我们成功了。但与此同时,团队也遇到了女巫攻击和空投“刷子”的挑战。有些人使用一键节点(我主动联系这些他们,要求他们移除 Nillion),另一些人则操作多个钱包,甚至有些人用 40、 50、 60 ,甚至 100+ 个钱包来获取不属于他们的空投份额。这些情况不是猜测,团队在 Discord 的某些群组里亲眼看到有人公开讨论这些策略。例如:

  • “我用 50 个钱包申领了”;

  • “我是讨论如何拆分 IP 地址以绕过检测”。

因此,团队决定:这些账户将不被包含在空投名单中,即使目前资格检查器显示其符合资格。团队必须确保奖励真正属于 Nillion 项目的长期支持者和核心社区成员。

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

基于真实影响的权重分配

那么,如何决定哪些社区贡献的权重更高?答案很简单:对项目的正向价值贡献。

这不是简单的“投入了多少时间”,而是是否真正推动了 Nillion 的发展。这意味着某些角色和贡献会获得更高权重,因为它们对 Nillion 产生了实质性影响。例如:

  • 文化贡献:塑造了社区的基础,价值难以衡量;

  • 志愿者角色:有人坚持 8-10 个月赢得了志愿者身份,他们的承诺比“一键节点运营者”更具价值;

虽然团队不会公布具体的数值或权重细节,但在此愿意透明分享其逻辑和分配方法,具体如下:

NIL 空投的价值加权奖励机制

团队奖励系统是基于矩阵框架,用户在以下类别中符合的项越多,奖励就会叠加和倍增。

  • 社区贡献者

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

  • 开发者

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

  • 验证者计划的积极参与者

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

  • 启动合作伙伴

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

  • 额外加成(这些额外贡献不会直接决定是否获得空投,但已经符合资格的用户,会因这些贡献获得额外加成)

Nillion空投大反转?CMO公布细则,确保不负真正贡献者

哪些人不会获得空投

Nillion 团队努力让尽可能多的真正贡献者进入空投名单,但如果用户符合以下条件将不会获得空投,具体包括:

类别 1 :低参与度的 secrets 提交者

  • 仅提交了 4 个 secrets;

  • 未质押任何 ETH;

  • 未有任何 Discord 角色(包括 Sage/Hot Potato 等加成角色);

  • 未持有 Nill Pill NFT。

类别 2 :低参与度的晚期验证者

  • 2024 年 9 月 14 日之后才启动验证者节点;

  • 未质押任何 ETH;

  • 未有任何 Discord 角色(包括加成角色);

  • 未持有 Nill Pill NFT。

排除以上两类人,确保奖励真正属于那些长期投入并展示真正承诺的社区成员。

对加密行业的意义

从第一天起,Nillion 团队就将其程序设计得具有足够的技术挑战性,以阻止纯粹的“刷子”。

Nillion 团队正在建立的模式将成为未来加密项目的空投模板。第一个打破旧规则的人,往往会受伤,但这是值得付出的代价,因为团队正在为社区认可树立一个更高的标准。至于那些所谓的“非官方空投检查器”,请保持理性,不要轻信一切,耐心等待 Nillion 官方 Twitter 的正式公告。

Nillion 团队不仅仅在构建一个项目,也正在努力创造一个新的行业标准,让社区的价值被真正认可。一起走下去,我们会让 Nillion 变得更强大。

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit4h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit4h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit4h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片