悦盈:11.4小币行情分享(SOL,ORDI,BCH,DOT,LTC)

金色财经Published on 2024-11-18Last updated on 2024-11-18

一个人的自律中,藏着无限的可能性,你自律的程度,决定着你人生的高度。

人生没有近路可走,但你走的每一步,都算数。

越勤奋,越努力;越自律,越优秀。我是周悦盈,专注主流币的走势分析,以自身技术对盘面之见解给出思路。

悦盈这里策略只有精确的点位,没有模棱两可的区间和附近之类的,喜欢悦盈的朋友可以点点关注。且看今日山寨分享!

索拉纳技术分析————

SOL索拉纳的走势是接近大饼的,日线看整体维持大箱体运行,K线在29号测试183一带收针后连续收阴回撤,布林带缩口走平短期均线向下拐头,下方的支撑在MA60和下轨一带,MACD快慢线交叉向下量柱放量KDJ向下延申VR指标在110值附近盘整。整个今年来看,索拉纳的走势跟大饼的联动还是不错的,K线图形也是接近大饼,这次回撤稍微比大饼大一些,也算是比较抗跌的产品。4小时目前在测试EMA200一带的支撑,若有效跌破就会延续向下测试新的支撑。短期下方关注155-151一带的支撑,第二支撑在137-140一带,上方短期关注170-173一带的阻力,其次就是前高180-183一带。

奥迪技术分析————

ORDI奥迪的走势处于弱势震荡,奥迪被套的朋友应该不少,因为前期热度高的时候很多看100-200,甚至500刀的市场情绪很浓,那么高位被套的,估计要洗盘洗的差不多,才会有强势反弹。除非有新的话题和叙事,主力来重新炒作,不然估计时间会比较久。日线看近期的行情一直在低位震荡,行情始终没有突破企稳EMA200一带,短期上方关注34-36一带,其次就是38-40一带。下方短期支撑在28-26一带,第二支撑在20-18一带,第二支撑是强支撑,跌破那么将继续下行寻求更低的支撑。短线可以参考支撑阻力介入。

太子技术分析————

BCH太子的走势也是收割的味道很浓厚,日线看从720刀见顶跳水之后,一直走弱势震荡下行,目前维持在100刀的区间走震荡,日线级别的附图指标都是偏向弱势,短期上方的压制在EMA200一带,其次就是上轨一带。短期下方先去看箱体中枢和箱体下沿一带。那么短线上方阻力关注355-358一带,其次就是380-383一带,下方第一支撑关注315-318一带,第二支撑关注295-285的区间。短线可以参考支撑阻力。

博卡技术分析————

DOT博卡技术面的走势也是弱弱弱,今年的山寨走势,除了炒作的热门火一段时间,其他的真是很难看。按照以往牛市的逻辑去思考,大饼涨,大饼涨完震荡横盘,就会山寨爆发一下。这是以往周期的逻辑和规律,那么逆向思维考虑一下,如果市场普遍是这样的逻辑,那么这轮牛市,只是属于大饼的牛,山寨不轮涨不补涨,那么市场持有山寨的币友会作何感想呢?这只是我的随口一说而已,这也是市场的持有山寨的投资者最不想看到的结果,当然,虽然对我没有什么影响,但是我也不想看到,万一呢?活久见的事情也有不少。博卡的周线日线技术面仍然是弱势,短期上方阻力关注3.98-4.0一带,其次就是4.2一带。下方支撑在3.55-3.51,如果这一带跌破那么有很大概率看到2字头,比较悲观的看法,仅供参考。

莱特技术分析————

LTC莱特日线看整体也是弱势局面,这轮除了一些新的叙事和标的有热度炒作外,老牌的山寨走势都是不太好看,这也是币圈的常态,新的叙事才能收割新的韭菜。老的山寨除非是它的生态做的比较好,还算有抗跌的属性,也有对未来的憧憬,还有翻盘的机会,不然的话就是项目方主力的钱袋子而已。莱特日线看虽然走了一波底部抬高高点上移的上行通道,但是不够强势,如果能一举站稳80上方,那么多头还能延续向上,80一带可以看作大的分界线。短期上方关注70-71一带,其次就是74-75一带。下方短期关注61-62一带,第二支撑关注58-56区间一带。短线参考支撑阻力介入。

PS:山寨控盘严重波动比较大,自行把握风险。

——我是周悦盈,一个专注于技术分析的老师。有任何操作或者趋势上有问题的朋友,都可以和我一起交流学习操作!共同交流,共同获利!

文章发布审核有延时性,行情瞬息万变,以上建议仅供参考风险自担!每天行情变化万千,我所能做的就是用我多年的实战经验,给大家一些微弱的帮助,让各位的投.资决策和经营管理走在一条正确的航向上。相遇便是缘分,我是一个相信缘分的人,如果你在币圈有什么疑惑不解的地方,可以多多关注周悦盈,相信会对你有所帮助。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Illusion of a Prodigy

The Illusion of the "Genius Youth" The article discusses the recent interview incident involving Li Bojie, a former "Huawei Genius Youth," and AI company DeepSeek. It highlights the core conflict not as a simple case of suspected cheating during a coding test, but as a profound mismatch in expectations. Li, with an impressive background including entrepreneurship, a role at Huawei, and a position as a chief scientist, was deeply affected by a standard remote interview where the interviewer questioned his actions. The key point is his stated view of DeepSeek as the "pinnacle of the Chinese tech world." For him, the interview was a quest for identity validation—proof he belonged at the center of the new AI era. For DeepSeek, it was a routine skills assessment. The article argues that Li, while publicly rejecting the "genius" label, subconsciously expected to be treated as a peer for discussion, a courtesy extended by other companies like MiniMax and Xiaomi. DeepSeek, however, adhered strictly to its standardized process, prioritizing consistent, merit-based evaluation over individual prestige. This clash symbolizes a larger shift in the tech industry. The core thesis is that the AI era is dismantling the old system where past titles, companies, and accumulated experience guaranteed status. Now, with rapid knowledge obsolescence, "excellence is calculated in real-time." Li's anxiety—waiting weeks for the DeepSeek interview despite other offers—stems from the fear that rejection means being left behind by technological progress. The article concludes that this incident is a harbinger; soon, everyone will face a constant, implicit "interview" with the AI age itself, asking: "You were excellent yesterday. What about today?"

marsbit7m ago

The Illusion of a Prodigy

marsbit7m ago

Vanguard Group Enters the Arena, Opening a New Crypto Portal for 50 Million Traditional Investors

Vanguard Group, the world's second-largest asset manager with $12 trillion in assets under management and over 50 million investors, has signaled a significant strategic shift by posting a job opening for a "Head of Digital Assets, Personal Wealth." The role entails developing a comprehensive digital asset strategy, establishing long-term plans, and overseeing the full integration of digital assets into Vanguard's wealth management platform, covering areas like custody, settlement, asset tokenization, and stablecoins. This move marks a notable reversal from the firm's previous stance. In 2024, Vanguard refused to list spot Bitcoin ETFs and removed Bitcoin futures products. By late 2025, it allowed some third-party crypto ETF trading but reiterated it would not create its own crypto funds. The new hire represents a third step: building an internal team to integrate digital assets into its core infrastructure, moving beyond merely listing products. The initiative focuses on foundational financial infrastructure—how tokenized assets and digital settlement systems can connect to Vanguard's existing platform, which primarily serves long-term, conservative investors. While Vanguard maintains it will not launch proprietary crypto ETFs, it is proactively preparing its systems for a future involving tokenized assets and stablecoins, which Citigroup projects could reach a $5.5 trillion market by 2030. Vanguard's scale means its chosen standards for custody, settlement, and compliance could set de facto rules for the broader wealth management industry. The firm is acting despite regulatory uncertainty and cautious market sentiment (e.g., Citi recently lowered crypto price targets). Analysts suggest even a minimal 0.01% allocation from Vanguard's asset base would bring ~$12 billion into digital assets, forcing the development of robust risk and operational frameworks. Ultimately, Vanguard's focus is on building the plumbing for digital assets to potentially serve its vast client base, an effort whose impact may extend far beyond any single market cycle.

Foresight News20m ago

Vanguard Group Enters the Arena, Opening a New Crypto Portal for 50 Million Traditional Investors

Foresight News20m ago

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Title: Paradigm's New Strategy: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other On July 8, 2026, top-tier venture capital firm Paradigm announced the successful $12 billion close of its fourth fund, marking a strategic evolution beyond its pure-play crypto roots. While remaining committed to cryptocurrency, the firm is now formally extending its investment focus to include artificial intelligence, robotics, and other frontier technologies. This shift was foreshadowed by a subtle but significant change to its official social media description earlier in March, from "A research-driven crypto investment firm" to a broader "We build and invest in the companies and ideas shaping the frontier." The move is driven by the firm's recognition of transformative technological waves beyond crypto, particularly in AI and robotics, and a response to the shifting capital allocation landscape. Despite significant AI sector fundraising, Paradigm emphasizes its commitment remains grounded in deep technical rigor. A key intersection for Paradigm lies in AI Agents, where decentralized blockchain networks and stablecoins are seen as a natural financial infrastructure for autonomous digital operations. The firm is active in promoting open-source, decentralized AI (e.g., investing in Nous Research) and building agent-friendly blockchains (e.g., incubating Tempo). It is also developing tools like EVMbench (with OpenAI) and the Centaur AI Agent platform. Within its crypto stronghold, Paradigm will continue focusing on core infrastructure areas. These include derivatives and new liquidity layers (e.g., Hyperliquid), prediction markets (with plans for a proprietary trading terminal), and developer tools (continuing development of Reth and Foundry). In summary, Paradigm's expansion reflects a broader realignment in venture capital, where the intense capital concentration in AI and the search for exponential growth compel even crypto-native funds to broaden their narratives. However, this does not signify an abandonment of crypto; instead, the focus is sharpening on real-world financial applications like stablecoins, RWA, on-chain derivatives, prediction markets, and the convergence of Crypto and AI Agents.

Foresight News55m ago

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Foresight News55m ago

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

"Priority Stock Domino Effect": Strive's $7.08 Million Loss Reveals Chain-Reaction Risk in Bitcoin Reserve Sector Bitcoin reserve company-issued preferred shares are no longer just yield assets but a credit test for balance sheet health. While focus remains on Strategy, Strive, the 7th largest public Bitcoin holder, disclosed a tangible spillover effect: its holding of Strategy's (STRC) preferred shares lost $7.08 million in fair value over eight days, despite no change in share count. This exposes a clear cross-company risk transmission channel within the sector. Strive's filing shows its 505,000 STRC shares fell from ~$88.59 to ~$74.57 per share. While Strive remains solvent with 19,864 BTC and $141.7M cash, the loss signals that preferred stock risks can spread via inter-company holdings, shifting their perception from stable income to credit-like, high-risk assets dependent on issuer liquidity and dividend sustainability. In response, Strategy unveiled a "Digital Credit Capital Framework," raising STRC's annual dividend to 12%, mandating a 12-month cash reserve for dividends, and authorizing up to $1B each for STRC/common stock buybacks and a $1.25B Bitcoin sale plan to bolster reserves. This marks a shift to active credit risk management, formally incorporating potential Bitcoin sales to stabilize its capital structure. Third-party valuation tools, like Farside's calculator estimating STRC's net present value at ~$49.89, highlight that pricing now hinges critically on perpetual dividend sustainability and the issuer's ability to pay amid market volatility. Bitcoin's price (~$62k) remains below Strategy's average cost basis ($75,651), intensifying focus on reserve policies. The market faces two scenarios: 1) Contained risk, where STRC's discount narrows and stress is limited to Strategy; or 2) Systemic risk, where deep STRC discounts persist, dividend hikes fail, Bitcoin sales commence, and pressure spreads to other issuers like Strive's SATA shares. Key indicators to watch are STRC/SATA discount levels, dividend coverage credibility, equity issuance rates, and any actual Bitcoin divestment. Strive's future reports will be crucial in determining if its loss is an isolated event or the first sign of sector-wide credit risk contagion via preferred shares.

marsbit1h ago

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片