Virtune Launches Solana ETP on Euronext Amsterdam; Raboo Presale Raises $2.5 Million

bitcoinistPublished on 2024-09-28Last updated on 2024-09-29

Abstract

Swedish-based digital asset manager Virtune has disclosed that it will be making its Solana-based Exchange Traded Product (ETP) available to...

Swedish-based digital asset manager Virtune has disclosed that it will be making its Solana-based Exchange Traded Product (ETP) available to investors across Europe by listing it on a well-known European exchange platform called Euronext Amsterdam. In a similar vein, the new innovative project Raboo ($RABT) is making an impact in the DeFi markets, and its presale token $RABT already grossed over $2.5 million. With many investors now optimistic about Solana ETPs and Raboo’s presale, can these developments trigger significant growth in both altcoins? 

SOL soars as Virtune introduces staked Solana ETP for european investors

As mentioned earlier, the Swedish company Virtune has recently launched its Staked Solana ETP on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange. The Staked Solana ETP allows investors to profit from Solana’s token price fluctuations and earn staking rewards without having to deal with the underlying mechanics themselves.

Virtunes’ staked Solana ETP is suitable for both small investors and institutional investors. The low fee and the simplicity of the product make it an effective means through which individuals can invest in Solana and get paid.  Cryptocurrency investments through companies like Euronext Amsterdam even make it easier for European investors to integrate the new asset class into their investment portfolios. As this update keeps making headlines Solana’s token price has impressed its holder lately with a slight bullish movement.

Early adopters could see huge returns in Raboo

In tandem with Virtune’s Solana ETP launch, Raboo ($RABT), a fresh player in the $62 billion meme coin market, has already raised an impressive $2.5 million during its token presale. This milestone does not only display how much people are investing in Raboo, but also reveals how the meme coin project is swiftly positioning itself in the DeFi markets to be worthy of being named alongside meme coin giants like DOGE and PEPE.

A notable aspect of Raboo is that it runs a vibrant ecosystem designed to engage and reward its community. To reflect this, a whooping 1.134 billion $RABT tokens is allocated for the presale. This large supply aims to create widespread participation, allowing early adopters to join the movement and benefit as the project gains traction.

Another interesting aspect of Raboo is its commitment to community engagement through fun and rewarding activities. The team behind Raboo plans to hold crypto prize draws and giveaways, which will not only keep the community engaged but also incentivize participation. With 135 million tokens set aside specifically for in-game rewards, participants can earn valuable tokens simply by being active within the platform’s ecosystem.

As of September 26, $RABT tokens were priced at $0.0057 each, marking an impressive 90% increase from its initial price of $0.003. In the near future, $RABT will be listed on exchanges, and by then, its price will likely increase, thus rewarding early investors of the presale token with a staggering 233% ROI.

Conclusion

The launch of Virtune’s Solana ETP on Euronext Amsterdam represents a significant step forward in the right direction for investors looking to engage in the crypto industry. Coupled with the successful presale of the Raboo meme coin, and its relentless pursuit to build an incentivizing and community-driven ecosystem, these developments highlight a growing interest in innovative investment opportunities within the DeFi ecosystem.

You can participate in the Raboo presale here:

Telegram: https://t.me/RabootokenPortal
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Raboo_Official

Bitcoinist

Bitcoinist

Bitcoinist is the ultimate news and review site for the crypto currency community!

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit4m ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit4m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit29m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit29m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit33m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit33m ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit1h ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片