Vitalik Buterin说“以太坊很好”——现在有可能突破2.9万美元吗?

币界网Published on 2024-08-22Last updated on 2024-08-22

币界网报道:
    Vitalik在社交媒体上的帖子激发了ETH投资者的乐观情绪。以太坊价格将大幅反弹。

以太坊(ETH)联合创始人Vitalik Buterin最近对来自投资者、交易员和社交媒体影响者的压力做出了回应。

Buterin在X上肯定了他如何被敦促更多地关注以太坊的看涨前景,而不是哲学话题。

“有人告诉我,我需要”少做哲学思考,多做以太坊公告“。因此,这是一个以太坊牛柱,得益于稳定扩散3修复+gimp。”

Buterin在X上发布的“以太坊很好”的帖子受到了好评,提振了那些因过去五个月以太坊价格停滞而犹豫不决的人的乐观情绪。

尽管包括比特币在内的其他加密货币在2024年创下历史新高,但以太坊仍在努力打破其ATH。

Vitalik的重新参与预计将影响ETH的价格走势,自2024年7月每日蜡烛收于3440美元的价格水平以来,ETH的价格一直呈下降趋势。

尽管以太坊在8月5日市场崩盘后略有反弹,但其价格仍低于关键的2900美元价格水平。

突破这一水平可能会引发ETH价值的大幅飙升,有可能达到2024年的高点。

Altcoins即将爆炸

更广泛的山寨币市场也显示出有希望的迹象。除比特币外,山寨币的总市值最近从关键支撑位反弹,表明潜在增长。

以太坊作为领先的山寨币,在这个市场中起着至关重要的作用。最近山寨币市值的突破及其对之前阻力位的拒绝表明,看涨趋势可能即将出现。

Vitalik Buterin的推文,再加上这些市场信号,可能标志着市场情绪的转变,导致ETH的价值上涨。

鲸鱼活动和智能合约的增加

以太坊网络上的鲸鱼活动也有所增加。在价格下跌之前,一条重要的鲸鱼一直在将大量ETH转移到集中交易所(CEX)。

在过去的一个月里,这头鲸鱼在两次价格大幅下跌之前向Kraken转移了25000 ETH(7390万美元)。尽管有这些动作,鲸鱼仍然持有41639 ETH(1.07亿美元),估计总利润为1.31亿美元。

此外,随着智能合约中锁定的ETH数量接近40%,以太坊的稀缺性变得越来越明显。

这一发展对以太坊来说是乐观的,因为任何需求的增加都可能导致价格大幅上涨。


你的投资组合是绿色的吗?查看ETH利润计算器


考虑到所有这些因素,再加上Vitalik Buterin的积极推文,以太坊似乎有望获得长期收益。

然而,就目前而言,采取谨慎的态度可能是明智的,逐步积累ETH,以期待潜在的回升。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit1h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片