黑客瞄准 Discord,知名 NFT 频道接连遭遇攻击

陀螺财经Published on 2022-06-06Last updated on 2022-06-06

Abstract

黑客升级网络钓鱼和诈骗攻击方式,利用流行的Discord机器人,欺骗用户点击恶意链接。

黑客升级网络钓鱼和诈骗攻击方式,利用流行的Discord机器人,欺骗用户点击恶意链接。

Discord是一款专为游戏玩家设计的公共聊天应用程序,已在全球加密货币所有者中流行起来,攻击者瞄准了许多知名NFT项目的Discord服务器。

Origin协议创始人JoshFraser本月早些时候在Twitter上分享了一个帖子,揭示了Discord存在的问题。

根据Fraser的说法,DiscordAPI泄露了每台服务器上每个私人频道的名称、描述、成员列表和活动数据。由于有许多备受瞩目的加密项目使用Discord,这些信息泄露可能会泄露尚未宣布的合作关系、即将推出的产品、交易所列表以及控制钱包交易的多签者。

区块链安全公司PeckShield此前曾警告用户Memeland、RTFKT、PROOF/Moonbirds和基础设施公司Cyberconnect的NFTDiscord遭到攻击破坏。

Cyberconnect和Memeland在他们的推特上证实了黑客攻击,并警告用户避免点击Discord上的任何链接。

Memeland的一名团队成员指出,Discordbot(Mee6)似乎在多个知名服务器上受到攻击。

Discord最常用的Mee6机器人被黑后导致多个NFT项目遭到攻击。Mee6是一个非常流行的Discord机器人,它可以自动执行多种功能:一些基本的审核、发送管理员消息、播放音乐等等。它被全球约1600万个Discord服务器使用。像Mee6这样的自动化Discord机器人是主要的安全隐患,它们的消息通常受到社区用户的信任。如果Discord机器人遭到入侵并且攻击消息设计得足够好,整个Discord的用户将被钓鱼,下载恶意软件或支付某些欺诈骗局。

由于有许多备受瞩目的加密项目使用Discord,这种信息泄露可能会揭示“尚未宣布的合作伙伴关系、即将推出的产品、交易所列表以及协调多重签名者”。

被入侵的Discord机器人可能会造成毁灭性的后果,黑客可以发布一个伪装成自动机器人的恶意链接并引诱用户打开它,一次错误的点击可能会对个人资产造成不可逆转的损害,并劫持的Discord服务器可以对大量用户构成威胁。

最近几个月,针对NFTDiscord频道的一连串攻击仍在继续。6月5号BAYCDiscord再次遭攻击,价值约200ETH的NFT被盗,在此之前BAYC的Discord服务器已遭受过攻击,BAYC联合创始人GordonGoner在个人社交媒体上发文称,Discord不适用于Web3社区。我们需要一个更好的,将安全放在首位的平台。

除此之外Nyoki、Shamanz、Doodles和KaijuKingz的Discord在4月遭到入侵,OpenSea的Discordzhan账户在5月也遭到过黑客攻击。

尽管目前NFT市场有所降温,但对其的攻击却不断增加。人们对漏洞开放的疏忽和黑客对钱包持有人的创造性钓鱼,使其成为网络犯罪的最热门领域之一。

几乎每个加密项目的Discord服务器都充满了虚假账户,向服务器中的用户发送带有网络钓鱼链接的私聊信息。如果你没有将Discord账户设置为仅接收来自联系人的私聊,收到私聊不会有警告弹出,告诉你信息来自你不认识的人并存在相关风险。

除了利用Discord自带的功能外,Discord诈骗通常还涉及“投资心理学”。在针对BAYC服务器的黑客事件中,黑客接管了管理员账户,并在YouTube上发布了一个假的NFT空投链接,欺骗渴望提前进入新系列的投资者放弃对其钱包的控制。

区块链安全公司Immunefi首席执行官MitchellAmador表示,针对Discord频道和频道内用户的黑客正在变得非常有组织,这是Discord还没有准备好应对的事情。

Discord在建立时并没有考虑到安全通信,也没有考虑到彻底的隐私。归根结底在于Discord并不是作为加密货币或NFT项目的交流平台而设计的。尽管如此,Discord仍然可以做出很多改进,以安抚加密世界。

加密货币或NFT潜在攻击链中的任何人都必须像政府机构一样受到高度安全的保护。加密货币和NFT与游戏是不同的,对攻击者极具吸引力,当攻击者发现加密货币或NFT的漏洞时,几乎总是直接导致价值盗窃,而受害者基本无法挽回损失。区块链的去中心化是双向的,有时它并不站在好人一边。

可以肯定的是,如果Discord还不做出改变,加密世界的用户最终会从Discord转移到其他地方。

Related Reads

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

Kevin Warsh, nominated by President Trump to replace Fed Chair Powell, is poised to introduce sweeping reforms at the Federal Reserve. His agenda includes structural changes, advocating for lower policy rates, a fundamentally new approach to inflation, a significantly smaller balance sheet, safeguarding Fed independence, narrowing the Fed’s mandate, improving coordination with the Treasury, and reducing communication “noise” from policymakers. Warsh has criticized current monetary policy as “broken” and called for “fundamental regime change,” arguing that continuity is meaningless when the Fed has lost credibility. He believes interest rates should be lower and that a smaller balance sheet would help achieve that, describing the current one as “multiple trillions of dollars larger than necessary.” On inflation, he attributes its rise to cognitive errors at the Fed—including overreliance on flawed models, neglect of money supply, and blaming external factors rather than excessive government spending. He also suggests AI could lead to a structural decline in prices. He strongly defends Fed independence as its “most important asset” and warns against mission creep, which he says risks its core objectives and increases political vulnerability. He proposes closer coordination with the Treasury to align balance sheet and debt issuance plans, clarifying expectations for markets. Regarding communication, Warsh supports transparency but criticizes the current “cacophony of voices” and “forward guidance” that creates ambiguity. He has urged Fed officials to speak less frequently to avoid market confusion.

marsbit15m ago

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

marsbit15m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit25m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit25m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1h ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片