CoinstoreLabs启动2024ICPChainFusion⿊客松:奖⾦⾼达500,000USDT

金色财经Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

区块链的开发者们,CoinstoreLabs将迎来第⼆场⿊客松活动,主题为2024ICPChainFusion,本次⿊客松我们跟ICPChain合作,总奖⾦⾼达500,000USDT!

CoinstoreLabs的⾸届⿊客松吸引了来⾃30多个国家的182位参与者,共诞⽣102个优秀项⽬,这⼀次,我们將再次传承推动創新区块链项⽬的初⼼,设置DeFi、RWA、AI等Web3主流赛道,期待与⼤家⼀起激发新的想法!

我们很荣幸在本次⿊客松中获得了众多知名媒体合作伙伴的⽀持,包括⾦⾊财经、PaNews、TheCoinRepublic、Mpost、TheNewsCrypto、Coincu、Bitcoinworld、Blogtienao、DroomDroom、CoinGabbar、CrypticWeb3、VOC、Bitdigest、UTB、Web3Oclock、Vakmarketing和

ConnectWeb3。此外,我们很⾼兴宣布与D²Labs建⽴战略合作伙伴关系。

加⼊创新浪潮:2024ICPChainFusion⿊客松

CoinstoreLab携⼿ICPChain,旨在通过本次⿊客松激发开发者们的创新能⼒,开发更多优质项⽬,促进ICP公链发展。本场活动将于8⽉16⽇⾄9⽉25⽇举⾏,为期7周。

参賽者将有机会:

• 深度探索ICPChain的创新性和⾼性能,该⽣态系统作为第三代区块链平台,致⼒于与⽐特币、以太坊及其他EVM等主要加密货币实现⽆缝交互操作。

• 精⼼打造dApps,丰富ICP⽣态系统。

• 提升ICPChain上的⽤⼾活跃度

参与此次⿊客松将有机会分享总额⾼達500,000USDT的奖池,其中包括:

• 奖励-10,000USDT

• ICPChainFusion资助扶持-每个项⽬最⾼$100,000

• CoinstoreLabs套餐:$390,000

这些奖励不仅将提供重要资源⽀持,还包含诸如CoinstoreLaunchpad、上幣费⽤和定制营销活动等服务,旨在加速参赛项⽬⾛向成功。

两⼤热⻔赛道

2024ICPChainFusion⿊客松有两⼤參赛領域,每个領域都蕴含着独特的挑战与机遇:

• 領域1:DeFi&RWA

參赛者可专注開發去中⼼化交易所和聚合器、跨鏈桥、质押、借贷、不动产投资信托(REITs)、供应链

⾦融、实体收藏品、债务和信⽤等颠覆性的dApps。

• 領域2:AI、GameFi、SocialFi&NFTs

參赛者可深⼊探讨基于⼈⼯智能的智能合约,⾃治代理和DAO、⾝份验证、数据隐私和安全、预测性

维护、玩家参与式游戏(P2E)、去中⼼化⾝份等前沿创新dApps。

为了全⾯⽀持参与者,我们将举办⼀系列研讨会,提供关于ICPChainFusion的深⼊⻅解,并提供个性化指导,助⼒他们充分释放潜能。

拥抱区块链技术的未来

2024ICP区块链⿊客松是⼀个重要的区块链发展活动,提供⾼达500,000美元的丰厚奖池,Coinstore

Labs和ICPChainFusion誠懇邀请⾏业领军⼈物、开发者和区块链爱好者参与。

该⿊客松将于8⽉16⽇⾄9⽉25⽇举⾏。

关于CoinstoreLabs

CoinstoreLabs是Coinstore交易所旗下的孵化器,致⼒于为杰出的创业者提供启动资⾦和资源,促进全球区块链发展,领域涵盖DeFi、基础设施、Web3和公链⽣态系统。凭借庞⼤的⻛险资本资源和战略合作伙伴关系,CoinstoreLabs⽀持不同阶段的区块链项⽬发展,赋能创新者改变⾏业,推动尖端科技的进步。

联系信息:Coinstore

Twitter:@CoinstoreExc

LinkedIn:Coinstore

Coinstore官⽅⽹站:CoinstoreOfficialWebsite

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片