观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

Abstract

基于比特币原生验证能力的wrapped技术方案是未来方向。

原文作者:Kevin He,BitlayerLabs 联合创始人

背景

近日关于  WBTC 项目控制权转移而引发了广泛的社区讨论和担忧。

作者在区块链基础设施方向建设多年,亲自建设了中心化 wrapped token 系统,和基于 MPC 的托管平台,当前正在建设比特币原生验证能力。

本文中,作者将会回顾事件的脉络,主要涵盖多方的实际举动和反馈,呈现事实本身。

作者基于实际系统建设经验,为 wrapped btc 的产品抽象了一个简单的架构和安全模型。

接下来作者根据免信任的程度来划分不同的产品的技术方案,指出基于比特币原生验证能力的 wrapped 技术方案是未来方向。

事件回顾

当事人

• WBTC

https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-08-12/90ea7b1086b164a5818466f0535ff69d

实现了超过 150 K BTC(价值超过 9 B USD)的 wrap,网站上实现了 proof of reserve 展示。

• Bitgo(WBTC 的原控制方)

https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-08-12/6a5c666ed10c9efc34c33e661f0b5001

https://blog.bitgo.com/bitgo-to-move-wbtc-to-multi-jurisdictional-custody-to-accelerate-global-expansion-plan-2ea0623fa2c 8 

宣告在未来 60 天内实现 WBTC 项目控制权转移,从 bitgo 转到 justinsun 相关的机构 BiT Global。

相关方

• Makerdao(DAI) 的风控团队(https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-08-12/ac7befad082ce6d7ac5d3db24f398356

https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-08-12/8ed464989303cd07a9c80159a1eec605

表示对上述控制权的转移表示担忧,认为 WBTC 存在风险,将减少相关协议的敞口。

• Justinsun(WBTC 的新控制方)

https://d1x7dwosqaosdj.cloudfront.net/images/2024-08-12/3494e412583529087cb869b609c355e7

承诺不会动 bitgo 的储备

第三方

• Weidai (VC)

https://x.com/_weidai/status/1822338179640218081?s=46&t=d7GvsY4LzVKLbD34L3 431 w

认为 validating bridges 将会是更好的解决方案

• Liufeng (Media)

https://x.com/fishkiller/status/1822455929247498459?s=46&t= h 607 g 0 TWNMlmAGBrzTVpyw 

质疑 biT global 的资质

Wrapped BTC 的业务模型

Wrapped BTC 的业务模型其实非常简单,如下图:

观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

wrap:

表示从 BTC 转换成 W-BTC。

wrap-house:

表示 wrap 的运作机制, 确保用户存入的 BTC 都有对应的 w-btc 在某一个账本(通常是一个区块链,例如 ETH)得到铸造,不多不少。

unwrap:

表示从 W-BTC 转换成 BTC。

unwrap-house:

表示 unwrap 的运作机制,确保用户在销毁 w-btc 之后,会有机制让他获得 Bitcoin 上的 BTC,不多不少。

对比 Trustless 程度

对比上述业务和技术模型的维度特别多,下面作者将从 wrap/unwrap 2 个方向的免信任水平来进行对比。

Non-Trustless

典型的就是 BitGO 的当前 WBTC,wrap-house 和 unwrap-house 的运作,都是由 bitgo custody 控制。

观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

很明显,用户需要信任 BitGO custody 服务商始终能够正常工作。

Single Way Trustless

接下来再来看在 2020 年前后出现的两个有代表性的项目:tBTC/renBTC。

观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

我们可以看到,在 x-chain(例如有完整验证能力的情况下,例如具备 evm),wrap-house 比较容易做较高水平的 trustless。

但 unwrap-house 由于受到当时技术条件的局限,只能通过阈值签名的方式来提高安全性,无论这个预支签名的做到哪种程度。

Dual Way Trustless

时间来到了 2024 年,得益于包括 BitVM/Starkware 的团队在比特币原生验证能力(包含 fraud proof 和 validity proof)的开创性尝试,随着 BitlayerLabs 等社区团队的实践落地,unwrap-house 将有望实现 trustless。

观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

其中 fraud proof 的代表是 BitVM 及其衍生项目,指的是没有 OP_CAT 的情况下实现乐观验证,主流的实现方案是承诺和挑战 ZK 验证的过程。

Validity proof 则是在假设具备 OP_CAT 操作码的情况下,实现 ZK 的直接验证;有了 OP_CAT,锁定的 BTC 将由所谓的 covenant(类合约)来控制。

方案总结对比

横向对比上述提到的各种技术方案,可以发现基于比特币验证能力(validation)的技术方案,将会在 2 个方向上 trustless 水平有更好的表现。

观点:WBTC该升级技术方案了

总结

WBTC 在 2018 年的横空出世,拉开了将 BTC 流动性带入 DeFi 世界的序幕。后续 2020 年的 tBTC 等项目做了一部分的优化和改进,以比特币原生的验证能力为代表的 validation 技术方案,将会在双向免信任上有更好的表现。WBTC,是时候升级你的技术方案了!

Related Reads

Insurance Industry Faces Its Biggest Competitor: Are Prediction Markets the 'Barbarians at the Gate'?

"Insurance Industry Faces New Rival: Are Prediction Markets the 'Barbarians at the Gate'?" Prediction markets, exemplified by platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket, are emerging as potential disruptors to the traditional insurance industry by offering alternative risk-hedging mechanisms. These markets allow users to bet on specific event outcomes, effectively creating a form of customizable, on-demand insurance. Key examples highlight this shift. In sports, Kalshi partnered with insurance broker Game Point Capital to provide NBA teams with more affordable options to hedge performance bonuses compared to traditional insurers. In real estate, Polymarket's collaboration with Parcl lets users speculate on city-specific housing price indices, allowing homeowners to hedge against price drops or buyers against price increases. Furthermore, businesses like a New York bar have used Kalshi to hedge marketing promotions (e.g., offering free drinks if a team wins), framing the transaction explicitly as placing a "hedge." The article argues prediction markets offer advantages over traditional insurance and even sports betting in transparency, liquidity, and flexibility. They provide a wider range of event coverage, act as neutral platforms rather than counterparties, and offer clearer pricing. The piece cites historical precedents like large "refund promotion" hedges by businesses using sportsbooks but notes prediction markets modernize the concept. However, challenges remain for widespread adoption as an insurance alternative, including limited liquidity in some markets, unclear regulatory status, and potential vulnerabilities in event resolution mechanisms. Despite these hurdles, prediction markets are positioning themselves as new tools for risk management, directly challenging certain segments of the conventional insurance landscape.

Odaily星球日报2m ago

Insurance Industry Faces Its Biggest Competitor: Are Prediction Markets the 'Barbarians at the Gate'?

Odaily星球日报2m ago

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been 'Eaten' by AI Agents?

The article examines the transformative impact of AI Agents on the cryptocurrency landscape, highlighting how specific sectors are becoming increasingly dominated by automated systems. Key "agent-eaten" sectors include derivatives trading (perpetuals), where AI agents demonstrate significantly higher survival and performance rates than human traders; MEV and arbitrage trading, which are almost entirely automated; yield optimization, with over two-thirds of new DeFi protocols incorporating AI agents; and spot trading/portfolio management, where agents drive a growing share of DEX volume. "Battleground" sectors like prediction markets and DeFi lending show a mix, with agents excelling in short-term/arbitrage activities but humans retaining an edge in longer-term, nuanced decisions. Sectors still primarily "human-led" include stablecoin payments/remittances (driven by real-world economic activity) and wallets, where human oversight for approvals and security remains critical. As AI agent activity grows, the article emphasizes the rising importance of human-agent verification layers (e.g., World/AgentKit, t54, Self Protocol) to ensure trust, accountability, and control in an increasingly agentic economy. The conclusion is that while AI agents dominate in speed and optimization-focused areas, human judgment, trust, and real-world context remain essential in value-creating layers like payments and identity.

marsbit3m ago

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been 'Eaten' by AI Agents?

marsbit3m ago

AC Exits Sonic Board, 'DeFi Godfather' Pulls Off Another Strategic Retreat

Andre Cronje, known as the "DeFi Godfather," and two other founding directors have stepped down from the Sonic Labs board. The S token, once valued at $1.03, has plummeted 97% to $0.028, and the chain's TVL has evaporated 98% from its peak. In his exit statement, Cronje clarified he was a technical architect, not a founder, and distanced himself from token economics and migration decisions behind the token's crash. Cronje revealed his focus for the past 18 months has been his new project, Flying Tulip. This project raised $200 million privately last year at a $10 billion valuation. Its token design includes a perpetual put option (ftPUT NFT) for early investors, allowing them to redeem their initial investment at any time—a protection not extended to public market buyers. This pattern mirrors Cronje's past exits from projects like Yearn Finance and Fantom, where he departed near peak hype, leaving later holders to bear significant losses. Sonic itself has seen a complete management overhaul in recent months. The article frames this as a microcosm of the broader crypto bear market, where Layer-1 chains are bleeding value. It highlights a harsh reality: a project's valuation is often tied to a founder's reputation rather than fundamentals. Ironically, Flying Tulip is set to launch first on the Sonic chain Cronje just left, underscoring a disconnect between the person and the platform.

marsbit24m ago

AC Exits Sonic Board, 'DeFi Godfather' Pulls Off Another Strategic Retreat

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片