特朗普演讲为何不提 Web3?

深潮Published on 2024-07-31Last updated on 2024-07-31

比特币是「无用之用」,以太坊是「有用之用」。

撰文:孟岩的区块链思考

7 月 27 日特朗普在纳什维尔比特币大会上 50 分钟的演讲,被誉为加密资产行业的又一个里程碑事件。但会后有人统计了一下,发现特朗普只字未提以太坊、区块链、Web3,唯一一次提到 Vitalik,后来还发现是听错了。

为什么特朗普不提 Web3 呢?确切的原因我当然也不知道,只能去问给特朗普写演讲稿的老兄,据说是《比特币杂志》的 CEO David Bailey。但是如果把这件事情放在整个 crypto 行业的大框架里来看,其实是不难理解的。

简而言之,特朗普的演讲基本体现了进步的比特币至上主义派的主张。

比特币和以太坊是 Crypto 行业遥遥领先的两个领头羊,经常被放在一起比较。但实际上两者截然不同,可以说代表着两个完全不同的思想门派:比特币是「无用之用」,以太坊是「有用之用」。

比特币的目标是作为数字黄金,数字世界利的价值标杆,除此之外别无它用,特别是没有任何使用价值。恰恰因为没有使用价值,因此你不能从效用的层面去分析它,不能用指标去衡量它的价值。因此比特币是不可战胜的,因为你想不到战胜它的逻辑。但另一方面,比特币没有给应用开发和生态建设留下什么空间,你很难在上面建造任何东西。有很多比特币的拥趸不断宣称,比特币是第一个也应该是最后一个区块链应用,比特币把区块链的合理价值全部发挥殆尽,区块链该做的比特币都做了,比特币没做的都是区块链不该做的,除了比特币之外的其他一切区块链创新全都是自作多情。这些观点正是原教旨的比特币至上主义的典型主张。这当然是对比特币的一种极致的推崇,但也是对于比特币无法作为基础设施支撑更大价值的屈服。

以太坊就不同,它的最初目标是做全球计算机,现在则是数字经济结算层,也是专用计算机,是一个有用的东西,从一开始就是作为一个生态基础设施出现的。这是以太坊的优势,但也是它的薄弱环节。既然有用,那么它的用处就可以基于一些指标来分解衡量,比如性能、TVL、用户数量、吞吐量等等。因为以太坊有用,所以理论上,如果你做出一个在各方面指标都超越以太坊的区块链,那就是一个更有用的区块链,就能打败以太坊。从 2017 年开始,出现了无数的 Ethereum Killer 的公链叙事,有些曾经一度获得很高的估值,其背后的逻辑就在于此。

所以可以这样比拟,比特币是一个大球,自身圆满,但是你在上面修不了上层建筑。以太坊是一块平板,给你修建上层建筑提供了良好的基础条件,但是它本身比比特币要脆弱。

川普这次演讲,虽然讲了很多,但其实只是围绕华尔街的比特币逻辑反复螺旋式增强,也就是认可比特币数字黄金的价值,对其价值表达信心,提供当选后的政策保证,一浪高过一浪,但是也仅此而已,并没有涉及到其他方面,完全没有涉及到区块链在改变互联网应用范式方面的话题。

比特币跟以太坊提供了不同的承诺,比特币是站稳数字黄金的位置,不断提高市值。而以太坊是打下基础,为 DeFi、Web3、RWA 等应用提供支撑。

我觉得特朗普对这个行业的了解不可能这么具体,因此他的演讲里主要体现的还是《比特币杂志》这帮人的长期一贯立场,就是我们终于把比特币这种资产确立为主流合规资产了,现在可以在主流金融圈围绕这种新资产,把各种可做的业务和衍生品都来上这么一遍。过去黄金有的,现在都给比特币加上。华尔街是比较喜欢这样的叙事的。只要客户喜欢交易,就有佣金可以赚。

相反创造新的技术、工具、平台、应用范式,这是硅谷喜欢干的事儿。所以像在以太坊上创建 DeFi、Web3、RWA 或者产业区块链这些事情,我们不能指望华尔街特别积极,还是得先干出一些名堂来,然后华尔街才会加入进来。

当然这并不是说特朗普的这些表态,如果真的落实的话,对 DeFi、Web3、RWA 这些方面就没有意义。意义还是很大的。首先是大量资金涌入数字资产的话,本身也会波及到这些上层建筑领域。另一方面,特朗普说要给 SEC 换人这个点非常耐人寻味。因为詹斯勒这个家伙虽然招人恨,但是实话实说,人家任内对于比特币是基本还是开绿灯的,没有过多为难。如果说只是站在比特币的立场上看詹斯勒,就算不是高分,也非常及格。詹斯勒真正的保守是体现在对待以太坊生态、特别是 Web3 的极力阻挠之上,特别是在 Hester Peirce 的《通证避风港》提案都已经起草出来的情况下,长期束之高阁,严重阻碍了 Web3 的发展。所以换詹斯勒这个事情实际上对于比特币意义不大,但可能是利好 Web3 的。

如果美国想要变成 Web3 的福地,SEC 而不是华尔街的态度更关键。只有允许 Web3 项目以自然合理的方式应用 token 进行用户激励和治理,同时实施有效监管,坚决打击发币割韭菜的镰刀们和欺诈者,Web3 才能获得一个较长的发育周期,实际长出业务飞轮。唯有如此这个行业才能真正摆脱大起大落的循环。

我不知道特朗普在这个问题上认识有多深,但看上去贺锦丽应该不会往这个方向前进,越是自认为代表历史前进方向的人,侵犯个人自由和权利的时候越无所顾忌。所以这次美国大选确实是关乎 Web3 行业利害的,且让我们拭目以待吧。

Related Reads

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit37m ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit37m ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit45m ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit45m ago

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

Silicon Valley's largest venture capital platform, AngelList, has launched a new fund called USVC, allowing U.S. retail investors to buy into high-profile AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI with a minimum investment of $500—no accredited investor status required. Promoted by AngelList co-founder Naval Ravikant, the fund is framed as an opportunity for ordinary people to access high-growth private tech investments traditionally reserved for VCs. However, critics argue it functions more like an exit vehicle for early insiders. USVC acquires shares not through primary rounds but largely via secondary transactions—purchasing stakes from early investors, VC funds, and employees looking to cash out at peak valuations. With companies like xAI heavily weighted in the portfolio, the fund effectively channels retail money into providing liquidity for insiders who entered at much lower valuations. The fund’s structure raises concerns: shares are illiquid, with no secondary market, and buybacks are limited and discretionary. The actual annual fee reaches 3.61%, far above the advertised 1% management fee. This model parallels the "low float, high fully diluted valuation" strategy seen in crypto, where early investors profit by selling to latecomers at inflated prices. The timing—alongside similar moves by platforms like Robinhood—suggests that Silicon Valley’s sudden interest in retail inclusion may be less about democratizing access and more about securing exits for insiders.

marsbit1h ago

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片