现货以太ETF将于周二交易。以下是它对以太坊区块链的意义

币界网Published on 2024-07-23Last updated on 2024-07-23

币界网报道:
现货以太交易所交易基金将于周二开始交易。加密货币爱好者希望它能扩大以太坊的投资者基础,许多人认为以太坊是一种区块链技术,其用例比比特币要广泛得多。这些ETF将直接投资于以太坊网络中使用的加密货币以太币。已经有追踪期货合约的以太ETF,但这些是第一个追踪现货以太币的。现货以太坊ETF应用Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust(ETH)Grayscale以太坊信托(ETHE)Bitwise以太坊(ETHW)VanEck以太坊(ETHV)21Shares Core以太坊(CETH)Invesco Galaxy以太坊(QETH)Fidelity Ethereum(FETH)Franklin Ethereum。

比特币ETF大受欢迎。以太ETF会是一样的吗?

按照ETF发行的标准,现货比特币ETF取得了成功:自首次亮相以来,今年迄今的净流量已超过170亿美元。对于一个新的资产类别来说,这是一个巨大的打击。然而,比特币的总资产为1.3万亿美元,大约是以太币的三倍,以太币的资产约为4140亿美元。这可能会限制以太ETF的最初吸引力。比特币现货ETF推出后,比特币价格上涨。以太币的表现有点不稳定:2024年上涨了50%,但大部分涨幅出现在今年的前三个月。尽管如此,对于以太坊爱好者来说,现货以太坊ETF的主要价值在于,它是向公众宣传以太坊用例的完美工具,这些用例远远大于比特币所能提供的任何东西。晨星公司客户解决方案主管、ETF研究资深人士本·约翰逊指出,虽然比特币经常被宣传为数字黄金,但“以太坊更像是镐和铲子。”他说:“前者的情况是它是有限的,可能是一种价值储存,而后者不是有限的,被用来构建一些现实世界的应用程序。”。

以太坊平台做什么

许多投资者从未对比特币印象深刻,主要是因为用例似乎有限:它纯粹是一种数字货币。但以太坊平台不同。比特币和以太坊都利用区块链,这是一种去中心化的、不可变的账本来记录交易历史,但它们的目的非常不同。比特币使用区块链作为数字货币。以太坊就像比特币一样利用数字货币,但它的区块链有更广泛的用途。(以太币是以太坊网络中使用的加密货币,但在实践中,以太坊和以太币这两个术语经常互换使用。)以太坊是构建智能合约的平台,智能合约是执行预先存在的合同或协议的自动执行程序。它可以简单到“如果我这样做,你就这样做。”关键是它们会自动执行,在区块链(以太坊网络)上完成,每次执行时都会产生相同的结果。它们也有各种各样的应用。最常见的用法是去中心化金融,或“DeFi”。这只是在区块链上使用金融服务的一个花哨的术语。理论上,你可以提供几乎任何银行服务:用户可以汇款、贷款或借款,开立储蓄账户,交易股票或衍生品或其他加密货币,获得保险。理论上,你也可以做房地产交易。用户可以使用名为“去中心化应用程序”的软件来执行这些功能。用例超出了金融服务。用户可以玩游戏。企业可以使用它来跟踪供应链。它甚至可以被用作结算股票交易的清算平台。以太坊的另一个应用:稳定币。这些加密货币的价值与另一种资产挂钩,通常是美元。由于比特币和以太币等加密货币的波动性,许多DeFi应用程序依赖稳定币进行借贷和交易这个承诺是一个交易网络,从理论上讲,这可能是一种更便宜、更快的经商方式

这是否为更多的加密货币ETF打开了闸门?

目前尚不清楚这一最新进展是否会为更多的加密货币ETF打开闸门,或者美国证券交易委员会是否会找到一种方法来阻止潜在的浪潮。任何其他加密货币ETF的申请人仍需证明基础市场不受操纵,这是批准这些基金的关键要求。但这在很大程度上取决于政治气候。过去,对于大宗商品,美国证券交易委员会传统上要求一个受监管的期货市场与资产一起交易。目前,这只适用于比特币和以太币,因此开发其他加密产品的期货市场需要时间。Bitwise首席投资官马特·霍根告诉我:“在华盛顿目前的政权下,这不会改变。但如果华盛顿政权发生变化,情况可能会改变。”无论如何,预计会有很多交易。晨星公司的约翰逊告诉我:“这些新的ETH ETF可能会交易很多。我想,如果这些ETF的期权可用,这一切都会进入超速状态……这些ETF有效地为加密货币赌场增添了一个全新的翅膀。”

以太坊本质上是一种技术游戏吗?

目前,将以太坊作为一个新的交易平台出售是主要的游戏,以太坊爱好者有一个强有力的论点:该平台本质上是一项技术投资。Bitwise首席执行官Hunter Horsley昨晚在CNBC电视台表示:“许多投资者将比特币视为数字黄金,一种价值储存手段,而投资者将以太坊更多地视为一种技术游戏。”。注:Jan van Eck,VanEck首席执行官;晨星公司的本·约翰逊;Franklin Templeton的ETF产品和资本市场分析师David Mann将于7月23日星期二下午1:10在东部时间的ETF Edge上发表演讲。ETFEdge.cnbc.com。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit6m ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit6m ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit20m ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit20m ago

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

This summer, the mathematics community was shaken as OpenAI's Astra model reportedly solved 10 long-standing open problems, and Claude Fable 5 found a potential counterexample to the Jacobian conjecture. This was followed by a major shift in physics: renowned physicist Gavin E. Crooks presented an open problem in stochastic thermodynamics to Claude, which the AI solved completely in days—a task that might take a skilled graduate student months. The problem concerned constraints on entropy production statistics under the Detailed Fluctuation Theorem (DFT), a core concept in non-equilibrium physics. Claude provided a unifying geometric answer: all possible DFT-compatible distributions correspond to a convex "moment body." Its key insight was that for a fixed "gap," the distribution is uniquely determined, making any general DFT distribution a mixture of these basic two-outcome distributions. This structure implies that for given lower-order moments, the nth moment only has a sharp lower bound, with no upper bound. Claude demonstrated that numerous previously published bounds on entropy production are merely low-dimensional projections or "shadows" of this single, unified convex body. The AI-authored paper offers a complete hierarchical characterization of the moment constraints. This case signifies a potential paradigm shift: AI is progressing from solving known problems to aiding in the exploration of fundamental, unsolved scientific questions, heralding an AI-accelerated era for physics.

marsbit20m ago

AI Accelerates Everything: Mathematics's Line of Defense Has Fallen, Physics is Already in AI's Crosshairs

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片