Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-14Last updated on 2024-02-14

Abstract

目前生态已有多个DeFi项目设有积分系统,zkLend明牌空投即将到来。

2 月 14 日,以太坊 Layer 2 网络 Starknet 终于不负万众期待,公布了代币 STRK 的空投细则, 2 月 20 日起,用户即可以领取 STRK 空投,以 STRK 为 Gas 参与生态项目交互。详细空投分配可参考本站文章《Starknet 空投来了! 130 万地址获资格,全览 STRK 代币分配细节》。

去年 3 月,Arbitrum 也差不多同期公布空投细则,随后为一众生态项目带来大量曝光,项目空投接连不断,项目代币价值水涨船高。且 ARB 发布空投时的市场活跃度无法和当下比拟,无论 Starknet 生态能否完美承接市场热度,生态项目的交互都是值得参与的。

Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

使用 Braavos 钱包的用户可在 Starknet dApps 导航页面便捷参与生态项目交互,比较方便。以下是一些推荐交互项目整理:

Nostra Finance

Nostra Finance 目前是 Starknet 上 TVL 最大的 DeFi 协议,平台目前支持基本的借贷和 Swap 功能(集成的 AVNU)。此外,Nostra 也计划推出 Starknet 首个与美元锚定的原生稳定币 UNO。

Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

值得注意的是,Nostra 目前是有积分计划的,会根据用户在 Nostra 的行为进行积分。大致积分情况如下:

  • 借出

稳定币:每 1 美元= 1 积分/每天

波动资产:每 1 美元= 2 积分/每天

  • 借入

稳定币:每 4 美元= 1 积分/每天

波动资产:每 8 美元= 2 积分/每天

  • 为池子提供流动性

稳定币/稳定币池中,每 1 美元= 2.5 积分/每天

波动资产/波动资产池中,每 1 美元= 5 积分/每天

波动资产/稳定币池中,每 1 美元= 10 积分/每天

此外,用户在存入第一笔资金后会自动生成邀请链接,可邀请新用户来增加积分。

zkLend

zkLend 是建立在 StarkNet 上的加密借贷协议,结合 zk-rollup 的可扩展性,卓越的交易速度,并通过以太坊的安全性节省成本。zkLend 满足用户对高效交易速度和低廉交易成本的需求,支持 ETH/wBTC/USDC 等多种代币。

该协议提供了双重解决方案:一个以许可和合规为重点的解决方案,面向机构客户,以及一个无许可的服务,面向 DeFi 用户——且不会牺牲去中心化。

ZEND 空投页面预览也已于 2 月 6 日上线,也算是目前 Starknet 生态 DeFi 里少有的明牌空投项目了。

Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

AVNU

AVNU 是一种去中心化交易协议与流动性基础设施,旨在始终寻求为 Starknet(以及更广泛的 L2s)上的交易者和 dApp 提供最佳执行策略。该项目通过在多个去中心化交易所 (DEX) 中搜索最佳交易路线来优化交易执行并最大限度地减少滑点。此外,其询价 (RFQ) 系统集成了做市商的流动性、优化价格发现、消除滑点并提供 MEV 保护。

AVNU 同样也有积分排行,产品 UI 及交互体验较为优秀,参与 AVNU 交互可以使用 USDT 兑换 USDC 的刷分策略,仅支付 Gas 即可,每日参与交易对积分的累计有一定增益效果。

Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

Ekubo

Starknet空投到来,一览值得交互的生态项目

Ekubo 是一个和 Nostra 非常类似的协议,同样支持用户进行 Swap 或提供流动性,也有积分功能,但详细积分公式写的并不清晰。目前 TVL 没有 Nostra 高,也不支持借贷功能。但如果单纯存一些富裕的资金进来博一下也没什么问题。

其他雷同 DEX 项目

除上述项目外,包括 10 KSwap、JediSwap 以及 mySwap 在内的 3 款 Swap 的功能和使用体验基本雷同,都属于比较早期的 DEX 项目,唯一区别是 Myswap 有积分系统,其他 2 个平台没有,舍得花费 Gas 可以同样使用 USDT 兑换 USDC 的策略进行简单交互。

Starknet.id

Starknet 生态域名项目,目前 Mint 新域名的价格是 0.085 ETH/年(约合 225 美元)。

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片