Axelar Network(AXL)跨链代币服务(ITS)现已在主网上线

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-02-08Last updated on 2024-02-08

Abstract

Axelar实现了跨 EVM 网络自动化部署。

Axelar Network(AXL)跨链代币服务(ITS)现已在主网上线

通常来说,在特定的一条区块链上发行代币并不困难。然而,在多条链上同时发行代币则更具挑战性。项目方经常需要将“原链”上的代币“桥接”或“封装”到其他链上。

通用消息传递协议 Axelar 的一项新服务旨在改变这一现状,使项目们能够无需任何编码轻松地在 Axelar 支持的所有网络上推出代币。

这个新工具被称为跨链代币服务(ITS),它保持了所有 ERC-20 代币的可互换性和相关属性,同时允许它们在 Axelar 支持的每条 EVM 兼容链上转移(目前有 15 条链,未来将支持更多链)。

ITS 无需许可即可使用,并且代币还可以借助“铸币和销毁”机制完成信任最小化的桥接。据 Axelar 的 DeFi 负责人 Jason Ma 称,“这样的功能在行业中前所未有。”

“目前市场上的另一种替代解决方案是LayerZero OFT,但它并非无代码解决方案,根据我们从开发人员那里听到的反馈,它可能需要一周到几个月的部署时间,”Ma 表示。

跨链代币服务(ITS)具有以下特征:

1.  无需编码:只有跨链代币才能实现完全自动化、无需编码地多链部署和管理。

2.  无需信任:通过在公链上运行的开源智能合约来实现代币跨链。该公链由动态验证器集保护,并在链上运行。

ITS 可用于自动化跨多条链部署和维护新代币,但它也包含“代币管理器”,可以统一部署已经在多条链上的原生代币,并在支持的目标 EVM 链上保持与原生代币的可替代性和功能,使团队能够轻松管理代币总供应量。

Fraxtal(Frax 即将推出的以太坊 Rollup)是最早使用 ITS 的项目之一。Fraxtal 的联合创始人 Nader Ghazvini 希望这项服务能够吸引开发者加入其新链。

“Fraxtal Layer 2 从一开始就集成了 ITS,为许多在底层加入的开发者提供了无缝的、无代码的互操作性”,Ghazvini 说。

“它本质上是一个去中心化的开源 CCTP(跨链转移协议),任何协议都可以使用和在上面部署。”Ma 表示,这使它与 Circle 的 CCTP 属于同类,后者往往用于在链之间桥接原生 USDC,只是没有中心化交易对手。(而 ITS 的)代币管理器可供团队使用,例如,用于链接原生代币的部署,以满足合规要求。”

“对于项目认为具有重要意义且具有高流动性的链,他们希望进行原链铸造。”Ma 说,并以 Ethereum、Polygon 和 Arbitrum 举例,“他们可以直接使用 ITS,并在其他链上使用 Axelar 版本的该代币,仍然可以完全实现互操作性。”

虽然目前仅支持 EVM 链,但 Axelar(本身是 Cosmos 链)计划在今年晚些时候将服务扩展到 Cosmos Interchain

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片