一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-01-29Last updated on 2024-01-29

Abstract

活动包括三重收益:Eigenpie积分、Eigenlayer积分和IDO份额。

原文作者:CapitalismLab

Magpie 针对 LRT 的 subDAO @Eigenpiexyz_io 今天开启了积分活动,这是目前为止 LRT 项目中给 TVL 提供者最大蛋糕的,项目有特色外加此前 Magpie 的 subDAO 有着不菲的收益,配置价值恒奥。

本 Thread 将分析 Eigenpie 的空投玩法,机制,前景,和收益预期,帮你明明白白地取得最大化收益。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

A. 空投玩法

当前存 stETH 等 LST 进去可以获取三重收益:

  • Eigenpie 积分,对应总量 10% 的空投

  • Eigenlayer 积分 ( 2 月 5 日 Eigenlayer 开放存款后)

  • Eigenpie 对应总量 24% IDO 份额, 3 M FDV 低估值

  • 所存 LST 的基础收益(比如 mETH APR 是 7% 那你可以继续享受 7% )

积分会根据车队总规模提供增益,越大的车队增幅越大,最高两倍,所以最好抱团取暖。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

B. 机制

Eigenpie 做的是为 isolate LRT(ILRT),每个 LST 发一个对应的 Token 隔离风险,参见下表

当前 Eigenlayer 上了这么多 LST,如果一个 LRT 项目笼统接受的话,那么这个项目要承担所有底层 LST 的风险,一旦某一个 LST 出现安全问题可能就会对其造成毁灭性的打击

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

所以就有了 Eigenpie 的 ILRT 可以隔离风险

隔离了风险也隔离了流动性,这是否会有问题呢?其实也不染,支持 LST 的 LRT 相比 支持 Native Staking 的 LRT,优势之一便在于可以充分利用底层 LST 的流动性。mrETH/rETH,mmETH/mETH 这些单独的 pair 其实更有利于和 LST 项目方合作激励流动性

C. 前景

这个项目有什么优势?毕竟发的的确晚了一些,但是目前的确有一块需求空缺尚未被填补:上了 Eigenlayer 的 LST 都迫切希望参与到 LRT 叙事中,而 Eigenpie 目前来看是最好的方案,每个 LST 又有独立的 LRT 不用担心给其他人做了嫁衣。像 mETH 这种利率更高的 LST,也可以继续发挥其优势。

Mint 出来的 mstETH 这些什么时候可以在 DEX 交易?是否会上 Pendle?

显而易见的是项目方有极大意愿和能力推进这些,无他,这些都可以带给 Magpie 旗下的 Cakepie,Penpie 这些 subDAO 丰厚的贿赂收益

如果你对 Magpie 的架构不了解的话,可以参考我们此前的推文

D. 收益预期

收益这边我们先看下代币经济:

• IDO: 40% 

• 空投: 10% 

• 激励 35% 

• Magpie Treasury: 15% (按照惯例不出售,staking 分红给 vlMGP)

基本是一个 FairLaunch 的操作,不同之处在于目前大部分 Fairlaunch 白名单内定比较多,而这个的 IDO 白名单大部分都明牌给 TVL 提供者

给到 TVL 提供者的权益是

  • 总量 10% 的空投

  • 60% 的 IDO 份额,IDO 占总量的 40% ,$ 3 M FDV 估值

就是说总量的 10% + 60% * 40% = 34% 都会给到 TVL 提供者,这占了初始流通的 34% / 50% = ~ 70% ,今后也没有 VC 抛压这些

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

目前 LRT 叙事非常火热,仅有 $ 7 M TVL 的 $RSTK 都有 $ 35 M mcap 和 $ 180 M FDV,目前已经发布其他几个项目的估值也非常之高

Eigenpie 最终的 TVL 多半会远高于 RSTK,如果按照 $RSTK 的 FDV 对标的话,TVL 提供者的总利润也可达: 10% * 180+ 60% * 40% *( 180-3)= $ 60 M

假设两个月后发币,平均 TVL 为 $ 200 M 的话,也是可以达到 ( 60/2)/200* 12 = 180% 的 APR,这还不包括底层 Eigenlayer points 的收益,在前 15 天作为早期提供者参与还有 2 倍的点数增幅

我们再看下此前 magpie 的 subDAO IDO 至今的涨幅

  • Penpie,IDO 3 M FDV, 14 倍

  • Radpie,两轮 IDO 平均 7.5 M FDV, 1.4 倍

  • Cakepie,IDO 20 M FDV, 2.4 倍

此番进军市场更大的 LRT 赛道,不但拿出了 3 M FDV,给到 TVL 提供者的空投和 IDO 份额均是当年 PNP 的数倍,不知收益是否会复刻甚至超越

总结:

1. 空投需要抱团取暖获取更大增幅,抱团链接:https://eigenlayer.magpiexyz.io/?ref=0x307225Bc52ef0fEDAa67b626996c0E74cEA924Ee

2. 特色机制为 ILRT 隔离各个 LST 的风险

3. 优势还有可以充分利用 Magpie 积累的 Pendle/Pancake 资源加速发展

4. 绝大部分权益明牌给到 TVL 提供者,IDO 额度透明的 Fairlaunch

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

原文链接

Related Reads

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit29m ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit29m ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手1h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手1h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit2h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit2h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit4h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片