ETF 关键节点将至,交易数据背后隐藏着哪些博弈信号?

foresightnewsPublished on 2024-01-01Last updated on 2024-01-02

Abstract

ETF 时间节点临近,链上及期货、期权等交易数据背后的动作与博弈,都极具指向意义。

ETF 时间节点临近,链上及期货、期权等交易数据背后的动作与博弈,都极具指向意义。 


撰文:Frank,Foresight News


迈入 2024 年 1 月后,现货比特币 ETF 几乎成为短期内决定市场走向的主要叙事,在此背景之下,数据层面其实也成为了观察市场情绪与资金博弈的一个有效窗口。


本文旨在围绕期货和期权市场的未平仓合约规模、资金费率、行权日期与行权价分布、IV 等数据来一窥背后所透露出的资金博弈信号。


两个关键的时间节点


其中从消息层面看,主要时间节点有两个:


一方面,路透社上周末援引消息人士报道,1 月 3 日 /4 日,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)可能提前批准一批现货 ETF 申请。


也即最快本周二 / 周三,美 SEC 可能就会官宣一些申请现货比特币 ETF 的发行人获准发行对应 ETF 股票。



另一方面,按此前进度,最迟 1 月 10 日,美 SEC 就需要对 21Shares/ARK 的现货比特币 ETF 申请作出决定,此后 1 月 14 日至 17 日也密集有 7 家迎来判决。


不过如果拖到 1 月 10 日当天,一般不排除美 SEC 再度推迟到 3 月中旬的最后时间窗口。


总的来看,1 月 3 日 /4 日,1 月 10 日 -17 日,也是目前很多资金博弈的两个主要时间节点。


数据背后的资金博弈信号


比特币未平仓合约:无明显增长


Coinglass 数据显示,全网比特币期货合约未平仓头寸为 43.24 万枚 BTC(约合 196.88 亿美元)。


其中 CME 比特币合约未平仓头寸为 11.48 万枚 BTC(约合 52.15 亿美元),位列第一,币安比特币合约未平仓头寸为 10.32 万枚 BTC(约合 47 亿美元),位列第二。



值得注意的是,从 12 月 30 日的年度交割日之后,近一周来比特币未平仓合约一直在 40.5 万枚至 41 万枚之间震荡,并无明显大额增长趋势 ,说明比特币期货市场对后市的博弈并不激烈。


永续合约资金费率:居高不下


与此同时,Coinglass 数据显示,BTC 和 ETH 的永续合约资金费率从 12 月 25 日开始,已连续一周处于年化 30% 以上水平——多头头寸持续支出相当于年化 30% 的巨额资金费,对行情突破上涨的未来预判较为坚定。



尤其是今天(1 月 2 日 00:00)开始,资金费率更是双双站上年化 50% 以上,这意味着多头每天都在大量补贴空头,不断失血。


这也意味着后续 1 月 3 日 / 4 日、1 月 10 日的关键节点上,一旦现货比特币 ETF 的消息不及预期,上涨势头无法突破,那多头就会失血过多,这部分不断支出大额资金费、坚定看涨的多头可能会迫于压力迅速平仓。



此前 12 月 9 日 - 10 日(周六、周日),就是如此——多头承受着 30% 以上的做多成本失血数天,且价格在周末两天迟迟未能突破,最终周一凌晨开启了三千刀级别的砸盘(推荐阅读《合约多头惨遭屠戮,「圣诞行情」何去何从?》)。


期权行权集中在对应时间点


Deribit 统计数据显示,按行权日期看,本月的比特币期权持仓集中在 1 月 5 日、1 月 12 日、1 月 26 日三天,且看涨期权(Call)均高于看跌期权(Put)


其中 1 月 5 日、1 月 12 日正好契合路透社传闻的 1 月 3 日 / 4 日出结果及 21Shares/ARK 的结果出炉。



从行权价格上看,未平仓期权合约的行权价只要集中在 5 万美元,应当也是博弈现货比特币 ETF 一旦通过,至少能冲高至 5 万美元上方。



此外值得注意的是,Derbit 的 BTC 波动指数(DVOL)相比往年也逆势上涨,近 7 日来更是从 44% 左右上涨 50%,达到 66% 附近——往年该时间段 DVOL 一直是稳步下降趋势,徘徊在 40% 区间。



小结


值得注意的是,最近市面上在追踪一只 50 天买入近 18 亿美元加密资产的神秘巨鲸(参考阅读《50 天,18 亿美元,本轮小牛行情的「发动机」浮出水面?》)——10 月 20 日至 12 月 9 日,该地址累计买入 17.6 亿美元加密资产,和市场上涨时间点完美契合。


值得注意的是,12 月 28 日,该神秘地址在沉寂 20 天后再次出手,从 Tether 获取 5000 万 USDT,并转入 Kraken、Bitgo、Coinbase。无论该神秘地址背后究竟是谁,18.1 亿美元的大手笔买入,本身就透露着重要的信号。


叠加现货比特币 ETF 的时间节点临近,这些链上及交易数据背后的动作与博弈,无疑都极具指向意义。 

Related Reads

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

The report analyzes five Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure stocks—Micron (MU), MaxLinear (MXL), AMD, Lumentum (LITE), and Vicor (VICR)—as distinct plays within the AI capital expenditure chain, rather than a single "AI trade." While all benefit from AI data center spending, they differ in their specific roles (e.g., memory, computing, optics, power, connectivity), financial resilience, and risk profiles. The author argues that the key question is not whether the AI narrative remains intact, but whether capital expenditure translates into real orders, earnings justify valuations, and portfolios can withstand high volatility. Historical data shows these stocks have significantly outperformed benchmarks but also experienced deeper drawdowns (~28% to -32%), highlighting their high-beta, high-volatility nature. An investment framework is proposed: core positions (e.g., MU, AMD) for stocks with stronger fundamental evidence; satellite positions (e.g., LITE, VICR) for high-potential, high-volatility names; and cautious observation (e.g., MXL) for smaller-cap ideas with unproven financials. The emphasis is on disciplined, phased buying during pullbacks—only when price corrections align with intact fundamentals and available risk budget—rather than emotional "buy-the-dip" strategies. Overall, AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but success requires strict position sizing, role definition for each holding, and preparedness for significant volatility.

marsbit1h ago

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

marsbit1h ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: - According to reports, Standard Chartered Bank has published a research report on Uniswap, setting a 2030 price target of $100 for the UNI token. - The bank's core logic is that the tokenization of assets will drive demand for open DeFi liquidity, and Uniswap could capture significant trading volume and fee revenue. - However, most institutional-grade tokenized products are permissioned, and the example of BlackRock's BUIDL shows that DeFi still faces significant access barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 target for UNI by 2030 is based on the hypothesis that tokenized assets will grow massively and a significant portion will flow into open DeFi markets, requiring decentralized exchange platforms like Uniswap for liquidity. The bank forecasts tokenized assets could reach $4 trillion by 2028, with up to 30% in DeFi by 2030. The key question is whether tokenized assets like treasuries and funds will trade in open, decentralized markets or remain within closed, permissioned institutional systems. This directly impacts Uniswap's potential growth. A real-world example is BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which, while using UniswapX for trading, is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This highlights the current trend: institutions may leverage DeFi infrastructure but maintain strict control over access and transfers. Furthermore, for UNI's value to rise significantly, Uniswap must establish a clear value-capture mechanism, such as the approved fee switch and token burn proposal. Regulatory and interoperability hurdles also persist, as noted by bodies like the Financial Stability Board. In summary, Standard Chartered's bold prediction hinges on the future flow of tokenized asset liquidity. While it signals institutional recognition of DeFi's potential, the path to $100 depends on overcoming current permissioned models and enabling truly open, cross-asset liquidity pools on platforms like Uniswap.

Foresight News1h ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

Foresight News1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, observing World Cup trends favoring strong teams, and noting the continued strength of Japanese and Korean stocks. He highlighted Anthropic's potential for a massive future IPO and the defensive investment logic in "picks and shovels" AI infrastructure. Qin Xiaofeng discussed trading HYPE around $56-$70, viewing the $50-$60 range as long-term support due to Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain traditional asset trading and its substantial fee revenue used to buy back HYPE. On ETH, he noted a divide between disappointed crypto natives and bullish traditional investors like Tom Lee, personally viewing current ETH prices as undervalued.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片