王川:为什么人们守不住四年三倍的资产?

mediumPublished on 2023-06-25Last updated on 2023-06-25

Abstract

只要牢牢抓住稀缺资源,不要在乎别人怎么卷,让他们挥霍真正的稀缺资源,去高溢价置换和争夺事实上的非稀缺资源好了。

1/ 美国最大资管集团 Blackrock 2023年六月十五号正式向美国证监会申请比特币 ETF 之后,btc 价格已经接近三万一千美元。这个场景让人想起 2019年,也是六月底,btc 价格重回一万美元。四年涨三倍,这个回报,不算太差。应当秒杀同期 99.9%的基金经理。
2/ 2022年六月十八号,btc 价格一度下跌到 $18250, 著名经济学家,诺贝尔奖得主克鲁格曼老师又准时的在推特上跳出来,幸灾乐祸的说了一句“老乡们,这太感人了” (之前他在 2018年底比特币跌到 3000美元的时候也跳出来过一次)。克老师发言之后的一年,比特币涨了 69%。确实太感人了。

比特币


3/ 但很多很早入行的人手上已经没有多少 btc 了。原因也很简单,大部分人都想要更高的短期回报,采取各种主观和花哨的策略,但本质都是在加杠杆赌博,不给自己留任何余地。这样迟早在市场的必然但不可预测的大幅波动中,被迫割肉平仓。
4/ 曾经有机构资金在 2020年三月的大跌中险些被平仓,但继续豪赌,后来反而还赚得更多,于是坚持这种激进的策略,这样在 2022年六月的大跌中,毫无悬念的被彻底清零.
5/ 缺乏冗余度的玩家,一旦被某个无法预料的突发事件冲击,可能迅速遭遇连锁反应,一个子系统的崩溃导致更高层系统的连环崩溃,短时间内升级为一个巨大灾害,甚至导致整个系统的全面毁灭。但被灭绝之后,这些人的经验教训也就很难真实传递给后人,也就必然导致下一波不知天高地厚的新人,重复他们的经历。
6/ 很多人无法承受 btc 的价格波动,但这个波动,其实背后反映更多的是美元信贷的增长收缩的变化。美联储自己都无法准确预测通胀和就业的变化,也就更无法预测自己的货币政策的调整。世界上所有的事情,是不可能“既要...又要”的。不可能“既要市场不好的时候价格回撤小, 又要市场上涨时回报好”, 不可能“既要马儿跑,又要马儿不吃草”. 如果客户对你这样要求,离开他,他迟早会投入麦道夫这类骗子的怀抱;如果老板对你这样要求,他只是想出成绩时把功劳揽在名下,出问题时把你当替罪羊而已。
7/ 人们常常把一些因为短期约束而产生暂时溢价的东西,误以为是稀缺资产。俄乌战争爆发后,原油现货价格一度被爆炒到 120美元一桶。冷静坐下来想想,就知道高油价会抑制需求,同时增加开采的活动和供给,原油价格终究会下来的。但不管你购买多少新的矿机去挖矿,btc 的供给不会增加,还会按时每四年减半,这是它和大宗商品/贵重金属的一个最本质的差别。
8/ 2023年3月,当硅谷银行濒临倒闭,上千亿的储户存款面临被剪羊毛受损的重大风险时,美联储果断出手,魔术师般变出几百亿美元的紧急贷款来拯救储户。btc 则根本不在乎,仍然在默默的每十分钟出一个块,仍然在默默的每两周调整一次难度系数。人们这时才突然意识到,什么是真正的稀缺资产,什么则是可以由少数人决定随意增发的游戏。
9/ 只要牢牢抓住稀缺资源,不要在乎别人怎么卷,让他们挥霍真正的稀缺资源,去高溢价置换和争夺事实上的非稀缺资源好了。

Related Reads

Why is XRP in the red now after a 50% weekly surge?

XRP fell 2.2% over 24 hours after a 49.4% surge in the previous week, moving back into negative territory. The drop coincides with major banks advancing blockchain-based payment solutions that address the need for prefunding in cross-border transfers, potentially competing with XRP's use case. JPMorgan Chase expanded its blockchain settlement system, Kinexys, to eight currencies, allowing clients to move and exchange funds around the clock without needing a separate crypto asset. Similarly, Citigroup operates a round-the-clock USD clearing network and offers Citi Token Services for tokenized deposits, aiming to speed up payments while reducing the amount of capital required upfront. While its 90-second settlement is slower than XRP Ledger's 3-5 seconds, using cash already held in a regulated bank may be more critical for companies. Furthermore, SWIFT has facilitated interoperability between different bank-issued tokenized deposits without a common cryptocurrency. In a recent pilot, HSBC and Standard Chartered completed a cross-border transaction using SWIFT's ledger to coordinate and settle obligations between their separate token systems. SWIFT reports that 17 banks across six continents are preparing for real transactions using this model. These developments in traditional finance present alternative, bank-integrated pathways for instant, cross-border value transfer, potentially impacting the demand and price trajectory for XRP.

cryptonews.ru6m ago

Why is XRP in the red now after a 50% weekly surge?

cryptonews.ru6m ago

The Ambition of the OEM: Dissecting Leju Robot's External Investments to Understand the 'Ecosystem Positioning' Battle in the Humanoid Robot Track

Leju Robotics, a leading humanoid robot manufacturer from China, is aggressively building an industrial ecosystem through strategic investments as it pursues a public listing. Founded in 2016 and known for its "Kuavo" robot, Leju saw its revenue surge to 258 million yuan in 2025, though it remains unprofitable. Its IPO plan, submitted in May 2026, outlines a strategy focused on cost reduction and full-stack capability development. Analysis of Leju's 13 disclosed investments reveals a three-pronged approach to securing its value chain. First, it targets core components like precision actuators (e.g., Lingxinqiaoshou), joint modules, and motors to control costs and supply. Second, it invests in software and AI layers, including companies working on foundational models and embodied intelligence datasets, to develop an independent "brain" while maintaining partnerships with giants like Huawei. Third, it forms alliances with firms in logistics and service robotics to transform from a hardware seller into a solution provider for real-world applications. While this investment network aims to create a competitive moat and support Leju's industrialization story, risks persist. The company faces ongoing losses, declining gross margins, and potential industry price wars. Many investments are early-stage with long payback periods and unproven synergistic benefits. Leju's strategy exemplifies how humanoid robot players are moving beyond pure R&D to ecosystem competition, betting that controlling the "hard work" of the supply chain will be the ultimate barrier to entry.

marsbit18m ago

The Ambition of the OEM: Dissecting Leju Robot's External Investments to Understand the 'Ecosystem Positioning' Battle in the Humanoid Robot Track

marsbit18m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片