Ethereum is like the best and worst parts of New York: Grayscale

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-03-31Last updated on 2022-03-31

Abstract

Digital asset manager Grayscale has published a report on smart contract platforms in which it likens the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain to the best and worst parts of New York City.

Digital asset manager Grayscale has published a report on smart contract platforms in which it likens the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain to the best and worst parts of New York City.
The report examines the granddaddy smart contract network Ethereum in comparison to newer competing blockchains such as Solana (SOL), Avalanche (AVAX), Polkadot (DOT), Cardano (ADA) and Stellar (XLM). The report comes in the wake of the firm launching a crypto fund dedicated to smart contract platforms excluding Ethereum.
In a section titled “digital cities,” Grayscale analyzed Ethereum, Avalanche and Solana. The firm compared Ethereum to the Big Apple, noting that they both share similarities with issues that arise from their stature:
“Ethereum is like New York City: it is vast, expensive, and congested in certain areas. However, it also features the richest application ecosystem, with over 500 apps that command a total value of over $100 billion—more than 10x larger than any other competing network.”
“Users and developers take comfort that Ethereum will likely continue to be the center of gravity for application innovation and liquidity due to the size of its community and the amount of capital locked into the network’s smart contracts. An L2 solution like Polygon is comparable to a skyscraper in NYC: it scales by building upwards,” the report added.
The firm went on to suggest that users moving to competing blockchains is like moving to a cheaper city due to the high gas fees and network congestion on Ethereum caused by overwhelming demand for decentralized finance (DeFi) services and nonfungbile tokens (NFTs) over the past two years.
“As Ethereum fees began to eclipse $10 per transaction, smart contract platforms like Stellar, Algorand, Solana, and Avalanche experienced strong growth in daily on-chain transaction counts,” the report read.
Grayscale described Solana as like Los Angeles, noting that it is a “structurally distinct network that is speedier and focuses on different use cases” such as on-chain order books such as Mango Markets, which requires fast transaction speeds and low fees to operate.
“Solana’s architecture relies on a different consensus mechanism that prioritizes speed and lower fees though at the cost of more centralization — rather than scaling through L2 chains Solana runs transactions through a speedy L1 chain. Running roughly 2300 transactions per second as of March 15, 2022,” the report reads.
Avalanche was compared to Chicago in that its economy is similar to NYC, but has a smaller network, “transactions are cheaper and less congested, and development is more centralized.”
“Game-specific subnets like Crabada, and partnerships with firms like Deloitte should offer more differentiation compared to apps on other chains, helping Avalanche craft a distinct identity moving forward,” Grayscale wrote.
Regardless of the comparisons, Grayscale emphasized the bullish use cases for smart contract platforms moving forward, with the firm pointing towards DeFi and the up and coming Metaverse sector in particular:
"The market opportunity for DeFi and Metaverse applications combined, in our opinion, is likely larger than the $2 trillion market cap of the entire digital assets market today.”
“Smart contract platforms are the operating layer that DeFi and Metaverse applications build on and leverage for transactions, ultimately driving value to the base chain as users accumulate native tokens for fees," the report added.

Related Reads

Countdown to the CLARITY Act: 25 Days Left—What Will Happen to the Crypto Market if It Fails to Pass Before the August Recess?

"The CLARITY Act, a key US crypto market structure bill, faces a tight deadline with only 25 working days left before the Senate's August 10 recess. The bill aims to clarify SEC/CFTC jurisdiction and establish a non-security path for decentralized tokens. Despite passing the House in 2025 and a Senate committee in May 2026, final negotiations have stalled over ethics and law enforcement provisions, jeopardizing the 60 Senate votes needed. If the bill fails to pass before the recess, its chances in 2026 drop significantly, with prediction markets giving only a 40% probability. Analyst Galaxy Digital has lowered its 2026 passage odds to 50%. Failure would likely lead to continued 'slow bleeding' in crypto markets, as seen in June's record $4.5 billion net outflow from US Bitcoin ETFs. XRP, which stands to gain permanent commodity status from the bill, could lose its 'regulatory premium.' Bitcoin and Ethereum, already classified as commodities via a joint agency interpretation, would face less direct impact but broader regulatory uncertainty would persist, delaying institutional capital and DeFi innovation. The path forward includes: 1) Passage before August (a major catalyst), 2) Delay to 2027 (extending market uncertainty), or 3) Failure, requiring the bill to be reintroduced in the next Congress. While delay is a setback, the bill's progress indicates the US is closer than ever to resolving crypto regulatory ambiguity."

marsbit15m ago

Countdown to the CLARITY Act: 25 Days Left—What Will Happen to the Crypto Market if It Fails to Pass Before the August Recess?

marsbit15m ago

In the First Half of the Year, Half of VC Money Flowed to AI, with These 30 Companies Alone Raising Over 170 Billion Yuan

First Half of 2026: VC Investment in AI Explodes, with 30 Top Companies Raising Over 170 Billion RMB In the first half of 2026, China's AI sector saw a massive surge in venture capital, with total equity financing exceeding 300 billion RMB—already surpassing the entire 2025 total. Key trends include: * **Massive Funding Scale:** The AI track recorded 1,203 financing events totaling over 300 billion RMB. Investment peaked in June, partly driven by DeepSeek's landmark 51-billion-RMB Series A round. * **Geographic Concentration:** Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenzhen dominated, accounting for 74% of deals and 86% of total funding. Beijing led with 95.5 billion RMB, while Hangzhou surged to second place due to DeepSeek's round. * **Sector Focus:** * **Large Models** were the top draw, securing over half of all funds (nearly 1.6 trillion RMB). * **AI Infrastructure** (compute, chips) and **Embodied AI** (e.g., robotics) were other major investment areas, with the latter being the most active in number of deals. * **AIGC Applications** attracted significant capital (59.6 billion RMB), indicating strong belief in near-term commercialization. * **Investment Stage Logic:** Capital followed a clear strategy: heavy bets on growth-stage companies (A/B rounds), major funding for mature leaders, and widespread, smaller-scale seeding of early-stage innovators. * **Notable Early-Stage Trends:** World models (seen as the "OS" for embodied AI) attracted the most early capital. Angel/seed rounds reached unprecedented sizes ("inflation"), and investment shifted from foundational large models to downstream applications like robotics and physical AGI. * **Top Companies:** The 20 largest mid/late-stage deals raised 1.565 trillion RMB. Leaders include the "Big Three" large model firms (DeepSeek, StepFun, Kimi), seven leading humanoid robot companies ("Seven Samurai"), and top AIGC application players. * **Outlook:** Full-year 2026 funding is projected to exceed 6 trillion RMB. However, consolidation is expected in the large model sector, with the window for pure-play general AI startups closing. Survival will depend on finding niche verticals or securing strategic backing.

marsbit20m ago

In the First Half of the Year, Half of VC Money Flowed to AI, with These 30 Companies Alone Raising Over 170 Billion Yuan

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片