CryptoQuant: "Blockchain Data Warns: It's Still Too Early to Call a True Bitcoin Bottom! Here's Why..."

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-31Last updated on 2026-07-31

Abstract

Despite recent price fluctuations in Bitcoin, blockchain data from CryptoQuant suggests the market has not yet reached a classic capitulation phase. According to analyst Julio Moreno, there is no clear sell signal, and Bitcoin has not entered a full-scale capitulation, indicating this is either a minor correction or could lead to further declines. Moreno notes that Bitcoin holders have only recently begun realizing annual losses, currently around 136,000 BTC. Historical cycles, however, saw realized losses bottom at between 1.3 million and 3.7 million BTC. This cycle could become known for the mildest loss phase in Bitcoin's history, or losses could still increase significantly from current levels. Two scenarios are outlined: the current cycle could be the one with the fewest stop-loss sales in Bitcoin's history, or the market could face further selling pressure as it has not yet found its true bottom. Moreno concludes that sell-offs on a scale characteristic of capitulation have not yet been observed, and it is too early to consider current price levels as the definitive cycle bottom.

Despite recent price fluctuations of the leading cryptocurrency Bitcoin, blockchain data indicates that the market has not yet reached the classic capitulation phase.

Julio Moreno, head of research at CryptoQuant, stated in his assessment that there is still no clear signal to sell Bitcoin, and that it has not yet entered a full capitulation phase.

According to Moreno, this suggests that $BTC and the market are either in a minor correction or could face further decline.

The analyst also noted that $BTC holders have only recently started realizing their annual losses, which currently amount to about 136,000 $BTC.

Referencing previous cycles, the analyst added that Bitcoin's annual realized losses hit a bottom when they reached between 1.3 and 3.7 million $BTC.

Moreno added that this cycle could go down in history as the mildest loss phase in Bitcoin's history, but losses could also increase significantly and surpass current levels.

In the analyst's view, the current situation points to two different scenarios. In the first scenario, the current market cycle could become the cycle with the least amount of stop-loss selling on-chain in Bitcoin's entire history. In the second scenario, the market could face further selling pressure as it has not yet reached its true bottom.

In conclusion, Moreno emphasized that selling waves on a scale that could be characterized as capitulation have not been observed yet, and it is still too early to consider current price levels as the final cycle bottom.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of the CryptoQuant analysis regarding the Bitcoin market?

AThe main argument is that blockchain data suggests the market has not yet reached the classic capitulation phase. There is no clear sell signal for Bitcoin, and a full-scale surrender event hasn't been observed, indicating it might be too early to call the current price levels the true bottom of the cycle.

QAccording to Julio Moreno, what are the two possible scenarios for the current Bitcoin cycle?

AThe first scenario is that the current market cycle becomes the one with the smallest amount of stop-loss selling in Bitcoin's history. The second scenario is that the market could face further selling pressure because it has not yet reached its true bottom.

QWhat is the current level of annual realized losses for Bitcoin, and how does it compare to previous cycles?

ABitcoin holders have recently started realizing annual losses of about 136,000 BTC. In previous cycles, the realized annual losses for Bitcoin bottomed between 1.3 million and 3.7 million BTC, making the current level relatively low.

QWhat does the article imply about the recent price fluctuations of Bitcoin?

AThe article implies that despite recent price fluctuations, the market may not be in a state of capitulation. It suggests the current situation could be a minor correction or potentially lead to a further price decline, as the market has not definitively bottomed.

QWhat final warning or disclaimer is provided at the end of the article?

AThe article concludes with the disclaimer: 'This is not investment advice.'

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit21m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit21m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit21m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit21m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit32m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy DATA

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing DATA Network (DATA) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy DATA Network (DATA) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your DATA Network (DATA)After purchasing your DATA Network (DATA), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade DATA Network (DATA)Easily trade DATA Network (DATA) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

1.3k Total ViewsPublished 2026.07.01Updated 2026.07.01

How to Buy DATA

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of DATA (DATA) are presented below.

活动图片