UK tests stablecoins in regulatory sandbox while proposing limits on user holdings

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-25

Introduzione

UK regulators are advancing a dual approach to stablecoin regulation, combining live testing within the Financial Conduct Authority’s sandbox with proposed limits on user holdings. The sandbox includes firms like Revolut and Monee Financial Technologies, trialing applications in payments, settlement, and crypto trading under strict supervision. Concurrently, the Bank of England has proposed temporary caps—£20,000 per stablecoin for individuals and £10 million for businesses—to mitigate systemic risks such as bank deposit flight. This cautious "test and contain" strategy aims to foster innovation in pound-denominated stablecoins while preventing rapid scaling until the market matures. The UK’s approach reflects the minor global role of non-dollar stablecoins and focuses on ensuring safe integration into the existing financial system.

UK regulators have begun live testing of stablecoin use cases under a controlled sandbox programme. This comes even as policymakers move to impose limits on the amount of stablecoin users can hold domestically.

The parallel initiatives underscore a cautious regulatory approach: encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while putting guardrails in place to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

FCA sandbox moves stablecoin testing into live trials

The testing is taking place under a sandbox run by the Financial Conduct Authority, which allows firms to trial new financial products under regulatory supervision.

The sandbox includes a small group of participants assessing potential applications such as payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading. Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX would be part of the testing.

Work is expected to begin this quarter, with testing conducted in tightly controlled conditions rather than through public rollouts.

Notably, the trials do not include major high-street banks, reflecting the continued caution among large UK lenders toward issuing or distributing stablecoins.

Proposed holding caps signal prudence

Running alongside the sandbox is a separate proposal from the Bank of England to cap the amount of stablecoins that UK users can hold, at least during the early phase of adoption.

Under the proposal, individuals would face limits on holdings of a given systemic stablecoin. At the same time, businesses would be subject to higher thresholds.

Individuals will be allowed up to about £20,000 per coin, while companies will be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

The measures are intended as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress.

The caps would apply only to stablecoins deemed systemic and are designed to be revisited as the market matures.

UK takes a “test and contain” approach

Taken together, the sandbox and holding-limit proposals reflect a regulatory strategy that prioritises learning and containment over rapid scale.

While regulators acknowledge that stablecoins could improve efficiency in areas like payments and settlement, they remain wary of their potential to blur the line between bank deposits and crypto-based instruments.

The Bank of England has previously encouraged banks to focus on tokenised deposits rather than issuing stablecoins directly.

Pound stablecoins remain marginal globally

The UK’s measured stance also reflects the limited global footprint of non-dollar stablecoins.

Industry data shows that pound- and euro-denominated stablecoins account for a fraction of global circulation, with dollar-pegged tokens continuing to dominate volumes.

Against that backdrop, the sandbox is less about accelerating mass adoption and more about determining whether sterling stablecoins can operate safely within the existing financial system.


Final Summary

  • The UK is allowing stablecoin testing to proceed, but only within tightly controlled regulatory boundaries.
  • Proposed holding limits suggest policymakers want to manage systemic risk before stablecoins reach meaningful scale.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the purpose of the UK's regulatory sandbox for stablecoins?

AThe purpose is to allow firms to trial new financial products, including stablecoin use cases for payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading, under the supervision of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a controlled environment.

QWhich companies are mentioned as participants in the FCA's stablecoin sandbox testing?

AThe participants mentioned are Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX.

QWhat are the proposed holding limits for stablecoins in the UK according to the Bank of England?

AIndividuals would be allowed to hold up to about £20,000 per systemic stablecoin, while companies would be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

QWhy are UK regulators proposing limits on stablecoin holdings?

AThe limits are proposed as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress, managing systemic risk before stablecoins reach a significant scale.

QWhat does the UK's regulatory approach to stablecoins prioritize, according to the article?

AThe regulatory strategy prioritizes learning and containment over rapid scale, encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while implementing guardrails to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

Letture associate

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit24 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit24 min fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit59 min fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit59 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片