BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-20

Introduzione

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a...

The current market is in an adjustment stage jointly led by policy expectations and changes in liquidity. Geopolitical de-escalation and the better-than-expected performance of the SpaceX IPO once pushed Bitcoin to rebound from technically oversold levels. However, the new Federal Reserve Chair, Kevin Warsh, unexpectedly delivered hawkish signals, depriving the market of the anticipated accommodative policy support. Meanwhile, stablecoin liquidity continues to contract, with a noticeable lack of new capital inflows, pushing the market back into a typically subdued trading phase characteristic of summer.

From a pricing perspective, the market still lacks sufficient macro catalysts to drive a new round of upward momentum. Daily trading volume has significantly shrunk compared to the peak in 2025, stablecoin growth rates continue to slow, and the supportive effect from Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) buying Bitcoin through STRC preferred share financing is gradually waning. Under the combined influence of policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin's short-term trend remains under pressure.

Hawkish Expectations Rise: Policy Uncertainty Suppresses Market Risk Appetite

The market previously widely expected the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, to signal a dovish stance, but the FOMC unexpectedly turned hawkish. Several members hinted at the possibility of further rate hikes this year if inflation pressures persist, and Warsh explicitly expressed his determination to rebuild policy credibility.

Trend models indicate that as long as Bitcoin remains below $73,700, the overall trend remains bearish, with key resistance levels gradually declining over time. Concurrently, Warsh's refusal to disclose his personal rate dot plot predictions has left the market without a clear policy anchor, leading to a rise in risk premiums. Historical experience shows that such uncertainty is generally unfavorable for sustained Bitcoin rebounds.

Technically, $62,446 remains a crucial support level. A break below this level could accelerate the downtrend. However, similar to the bottoming process in 2022, the market might also experience a prolonged period of consolidation, gradually forming a cycle low.

Liquidity Continues to Contract: Lack of New Capital Limits Rebound Potential

Beyond macro factors, insufficient liquidity is becoming a core constraint for the current market. Daily trading volume has sometimes shrunk to around $50 billion, while the average daily volume during the uptrend from July to October 2025 was approximately $200 billion, representing only about 25% of the previous peak.

Stablecoin growth has also noticeably slowed. The 12-month rolling growth rates for USDT and USDC peaked at 52% and 122% respectively in late 2025. Currently, their year-on-year growth rates have fallen back to around 20%, with the 6-month growth rate approaching zero, reflecting a significant weakening of new liquidity.

Meanwhile, capital inflows from Bitcoin ETFs and Strategy have also weakened considerably compared to before. Previously, Strategy's aggressive issuance of STRC preferred shares once drove Bitcoin up by approximately $15,000, a gain close to 20%, but this supportive effect is fading. Currently, the market's 30-day rolling capital flow remains in a net outflow state. In the absence of new, strong catalysts, a sustained uptrend remains difficult to form.

Overall, with inflation at 4.2% far exceeding the Fed's 2.0% target, and under the combined influence of the hawkish stance, typical summer seasonal weakness, and liquidity scarcity, Bitcoin currently lacks sufficient support to sustain a stable position above $60,000 in the short term. However, as the market gradually completes its clearing process, this round of adjustment could still establish a cycle low this summer. Prices may not immediately launch a new bull run, but this process may be laying the groundwork for the next bull market cycle.

Some of the above viewpoints are from BIT on Target. Contact us to obtain the full BIT on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market carries risks, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be highly risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after carefully considering personal circumstances and consulting with financial professionals. BIT is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided herein.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what are the main factors suppressing Bitcoin's short-term price action?

AThe article states that Bitcoin's short-term price action is suppressed by three main factors: 1) Hawkish signals from the new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, creating policy uncertainty. 2) Continuously contracting liquidity, including low daily trading volume and slowing stablecoin growth. 3) Typical seasonal weakness during the summer.

QWhat specific technical price levels does the article mention for Bitcoin's trend and support?

AThe article mentions that as long as Bitcoin remains below $73,700, the overall trend is considered bearish. A key support level is identified at $62,446. A break below this support could accelerate the downtrend.

QHow has the funding flow from Bitcoin ETFs and Strategy (MicroStrategy) changed recently, as described in the article?

AThe article indicates that the capital inflow from Bitcoin ETFs and Strategy has weakened noticeably compared to earlier periods. Specifically, the supportive effect from Strategy's aggressive issuance of STRC preferred shares to buy Bitcoin, which previously contributed to a significant price rise, is now diminishing.

QWhat comparison does the article draw between the current market environment and a past Bitcoin cycle?

AThe article suggests that the current market may experience a prolonged period of consolidation and bottom-building, similar to the accumulation process seen in 2022.

QWhat is the article's overall outlook for Bitcoin in the coming summer period?

AThe article's outlook is cautious in the short term, stating that a sustained move above $60,000 lacks sufficient support. However, it posits that the ongoing adjustment could potentially build a cyclical low point during the summer, preparing the ground for a new bull cycle, even if a rapid price surge doesn't begin immediately.

Letture associate

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit40 min fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit40 min fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手2 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手2 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit3 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit3 h fa

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit4 h fa

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片