Tether Q4 2025 Report: USDT Market Cap Nears $190 Billion, Multiple Indicators Hit Record Highs

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-05

Introduzione

Tether's Q4 2025 report highlights record-breaking performance for USDT, with its market capitalization reaching $187.3 billion. Despite a market-wide slowdown following a crypto liquidation event on October 10, USDT grew by 3.5% in market cap during the subsequent period, while other major stablecoins declined. Key achievements include an eighth consecutive quarter of over 30 million new users, bringing the total user base to 534.5 million. On-chain wallet holders saw the largest quarterly increase, reaching 139.1 million. Monthly active on-chain users hit a record 24.8 million, and both on-chain transfer volume and value reached all-time highs, with quarterly transfers totaling $4.4 trillion. USDT’s reserve assets grew to $192.9 billion, including increased holdings in U.S. Treasuries, Bitcoin, and gold. Its role extends beyond crypto trading, with strong adoption for savings and transactions. USDT dominates stablecoin usage, accounting for 65.9% of single-asset transfer value and 75% of savings-oriented wallets among all stablecoins.

USDT achieved multiple new highs in the fourth quarter of 2025, as follows:

· Market capitalization reached $187.3 billion;

· Achieved over 30 million new users for the eighth consecutive quarter;

· Recorded the largest quarterly increase in the number of on-chain wallets holding USDT;

· Monthly active on-chain users reached an all-time high;

· Both the number and value of on-chain transfers hit record levels.

Meanwhile, a chain reaction of cryptocurrency liquidations that occurred on October 10, 2025, has led to a slowdown in the growth rate of the stablecoin ecosystem. Between October 10, 2025, and February 1, 2026, the total cryptocurrency market capitalization fell by over one-third. During this period, the market cap of USDT grew by 3.5%; in contrast, the market caps of the second and third largest stablecoins fell by 2.6% and 57%, respectively.

The sustained growth of USDT relies not only on the cryptocurrency market but also on various use cases beyond it. Data clearly shows that users prefer USDT as a stablecoin for both storing wealth and conducting transactions.

These conclusions are primarily based on Tether's analysis of blockchain data (also known as on-chain data). On-chain data for 75 stablecoins across 15 blockchains were sourced from Chainalysis and Artemis.

Market Capitalization

In Q4 2025, the USDT market cap grew by $12.4 billion, reaching $187.3 billion. The month-over-month growth rate in October was 4.9%, but its growth pace slowed after the cryptocurrency liquidation wave on October 10.

Reserves

In Q4 2025, Tether's total reserves increased by $11.7 billion, reaching $192.9 billion, with net equity (assets exceeding liabilities) of $6.3 billion. The total reserves include 96,184 Bitcoin (9,850 added in Q4) and 127.5 metric tons of gold (21.9 metric tons added in Q4).

In Q4, Tether's total holdings of U.S. Treasury Bills increased by $6.5 billion, reaching $141.6 billion. If Tether were considered a "country," its holdings of U.S. Treasury Bills would rank 18th globally, surpassing Saudi Arabia and Germany.

Throughout 2025, Tether accumulated an additional $28.2 billion in U.S. Treasury Bills. Over the past 12 months, compared to the accumulation by countries, Tether became the seventh largest buyer of U.S. Treasury Bills, purchasing more than Taiwan and South Korea.

Total Users

In Q4 2025, the estimated total number of USDT users increased by 35.2 million, reaching 534.5 million. This marks the eighth consecutive quarter of growth exceeding 30 million users for this stablecoin. The user count here includes two parts: on-chain wallet users (those who have received USDT and held it for at least 24 hours) and the estimated number of users receiving USDT on centralized service platforms (such as cryptocurrency exchanges).

On-Chain Holders

In Q4 2025, the number of on-chain wallet users holding USDT increased by 14.7 million, reaching a total of 139.1 million, setting a new quarterly growth record. Wallets holding USDT account for 70.7% of all wallets holding any stablecoin. In addition to on-chain wallet users, it is estimated that over 100 million users hold USDT on centralized service platforms like exchanges.

The structure of USDT on-chain holders remained relatively stable, distributed as follows:

· "Pure Savers" (wallet users who retain 100% of received USDT): 30.8%;

· "Savers" (wallet users who retain on average less than 100% but more than 2/3 of received USDT): 6.7%;

· "Transactors" (wallet users who retain on average less than 2/3 of received USDT): 62.6%.

Compared to all other stablecoins, USDT has a higher proportion of "Savers" and "Pure Savers" (37.5% for USDT vs. 30% for other stablecoins collectively). Among all stablecoin savings wallets, 75.1% choose to hold USDT, indicating that USDT remains the preferred stablecoin for wealth storage.

On-Chain Active Users

In Q4 2025, the average number of monthly active on-chain users for USDT (wallet users who received USDT at least once in a 30-day rolling period) reached 24.8 million, an all-time high, indicating continuously improving user activity. This number represents 68.4% of the total monthly active users for all stablecoins.

Holdings Distribution by User Type

As of the end of Q4 2025, 36% of USDT holdings were concentrated on centralized exchanges (CEXs), an increase of 2.8 percentage points from the end of Q3. This change was partly due to a decrease in USDT holdings on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms following the October 10 cryptocurrency liquidation wave: in Q4, USDT on DEXs and DeFi platforms decreased by $3 billion (a 2 percentage point drop in share) to $7.1 billion, accounting for 3.8% of total USDT holdings.

The second largest share of holdings belongs to Savers, accounting for 33%, with "Pure Savers" holding 17.4% and other "Savers" holding 15.6%. In Q4, Savers' USDT holdings increased by $2.9 billion, reaching a total of $62.1 billion by the end of the quarter. As mentioned earlier, USDT not only attracts the most Savers but also stores the highest USD value: it accounts for 59.9% of the savings value across all stablecoins; if wallets holding over $10 million (which are mostly exchange cold wallets) are excluded, USDT's share rises to 77.3%.

"Transactors" ranked third in holdings share, at 26.5% as of the end of Q4. This share remained relatively stable from Q3 to Q4, and the holdings of "Transactors" increased by $2.2 billion, reflecting USDT's continued growth in liquidity for transactional use cases.

Note that the total holdings figure here is slightly higher than the USDT market cap because total holdings include USDT in Tether's treasury that has not yet been issued, while the market cap only calculates USDT in net circulation.

On-Chain Transfer Value

In Q4 2025, the quarterly on-chain transfer value of USDT increased by $248.6 billion, reaching $4.4 trillion, an all-time high. Of this $4.4 trillion quarterly total transfer value, $2.8 trillion (63.6%) were transfers involving only USDT, and $1.6 trillion (36.4%) were transfers involving multiple assets (these often occur in DeFi swap scenarios).

USDT's share of value in single-asset stablecoin transfers was 65.9%; its share in multi-asset stablecoin transfers was 34.6%. This data indicates that USDT remains the preferred stablecoin for value transfer, while other stablecoins are more often used for value exchange, often with USDT as the counterparty.

On-Chain Transfer Count

In Q4 2025, the quarterly count of on-chain USDT transfers increased by 313.1 million, reaching 2.2 billion, an all-time high. Of these 2.2 billion total quarterly transfers:

· 1.94 billion transfers (88.2%) were for amounts below $1,000;

· 256 million transfers (11.6%) were for amounts between $1,000 and $100,000;

· 4.6 million transfers (0.2%) were for amounts over $100,000.

Velocity

As of the end of Q4 2025, calculated on a 7-day moving average, USDT's velocity (daily transfer value as a percentage of total holdings) was 18.2%. This is lower than the peak of 51.8% on November 5 (driven by a surge in DeFi activity) and is similar to levels seen prior to Q2 2025 (when Bitcoin prices were similar to this quarter).

The average velocity for USDT in Q4 was 28%, significantly lower than the 151% velocity of the second-largest stablecoin by market cap. USDT's relatively lower velocity indicates a user base with stronger stickiness, higher stability, and, as discussed later, more diverse use cases.

USDT's velocity naturally varies by use case: users holding USDT for savings purposes have lower velocity (as they typically hold rather than transfer). The velocity for "Pure Savers" is naturally 0, while the average daily velocity for "Savers" in 2025 was 4%.

On-chain velocity for centralized exchanges is also low, with an average daily velocity of 11% in 2025. This is because users hold USDT on exchanges for both potential savings and trading—but as the next section will mention, trading volume on exchanges is recorded on centralized order books, not on the blockchain, so the amount of USDT transferred on-chain out of centralized exchanges is low relative to the USDT holdings on those exchanges.

Use cases with higher USDT velocity include:

· "Transactor" wallets: Average daily velocity in 2025 was 51%. These wallets transfer USDT for various purposes, including payments, remittances, moving funds between exchanges, etc.;

· DEX and DeFi platforms: Average daily velocity in 2025 was 111%. Velocity in these scenarios is typically very high because DEX trades are recorded on the blockchain, and users may execute multiple trades in a single day, ultimately resulting in velocity exceeding 100%.

67% of USDT's market cap is distributed in low-velocity scenarios, and 33% in high-velocity scenarios. This distribution ensures stability through low-velocity scenarios and liquidity through high-velocity scenarios.

Spot Market

In Q4 2025, the spot trading volume for USDT on centralized exchanges was $3.2 trillion, of which 96.5% had USDT as the quote asset, and the remainder had other assets quoted against USDT. Affected by the October 10 cryptocurrency liquidation wave, volume decreased by 5.9% compared to Q3. However, since the trading volume of all other assets decreased by 11.5% compared to Q3, USDT's share of the total spot market trading volume反而 increased by 1.5 percentage points, reaching 61.5%.

In Q4, the number of USDT spot trades was 14.1 billion, accounting for 80% of all spot trades in the quarter.

Conclusion

In Q4 2025, USDT achieved numerous all-time highs, although growth slowed after the October 10 cryptocurrency liquidation wave. However, the data indicates that the cryptocurrency market is not the sole driver of USDT's growth.

Compared to other stablecoins, user preference for saving in USDT is significantly higher (USDT accounts for 75% of all stablecoin savings wallets; and 77% of the savings value in wallets holding less than $10 million), providing USDT with a stable, low-velocity source of demand.

In high-velocity use cases as a medium of exchange, USDT also leads: it accounts for 65.9% of the value in single-asset stablecoin transfers and 34.6% in multi-asset stablecoin transfers. This phenomenon indicates that USDT remains the preferred stablecoin for value transfer, while other stablecoins are more often used for value exchange (often with USDT as the counterparty). These high-velocity use cases provide ample liquidity for USDT, ensuring its wide availability and acceptance.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the market capitalization of USDT in Q4 2025, and how much did it grow by during that quarter?

AThe market capitalization of USDT reached $187.3 billion in Q4 2025, growing by $12.4 billion during that quarter.

QHow did the market performance of the second and third largest stablecoins compare to USDT during the period from October 10, 2025, to February 1, 2026?

ADuring that period, while the total cryptocurrency market cap fell by over a third, USDT's market cap grew by 3.5%. In contrast, the market caps of the second and third largest stablecoins fell by 2.6% and 57%, respectively.

QWhat are the three main categories of on-chain USDT holders and their respective proportions of the total supply?

AThe three categories are: 'Pure Savings' holders (30.8%), 'Savings' holders (6.7%), and 'Transactional' holders (62.6%).

QWhat percentage of all stablecoin savings value is held in USDT, and how does this change when excluding wallets holding over $10 million?

AUSDT accounts for 59.9% of all stablecoin savings value. When excluding wallets holding over $10 million (which are often exchange wallets), this figure rises to 77.3%.

QWhat was the total on-chain transfer value for USDT in Q4 2025, and how is it broken down between single-asset and multi-asset transfers?

AThe total on-chain transfer value for USDT in Q4 2025 was $4.4 trillion. This was broken down into $2.8 trillion (63.6%) from single-asset transfers and $1.6 trillion (36.4%) from multi-asset transfers.

Letture associate

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit38 min fa

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit38 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit45 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit45 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手47 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手47 min fa

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcrypto50 min fa

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcrypto50 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手1 h fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot