# Wallet Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Wallet", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Solana Triples Its Transaction Processing Capacity. What's Next?

Solana has deployed a significant upgrade, "Transaction V1" (txv1), to its mainnet, testnet, and devnet. This update triples the network's transaction capacity by increasing the maximum serialized transaction size from 1,232 bytes to 4,096 bytes. The change allows developers to include more instructions and data within a single atomic transaction, a key advantage for complex operations in DeFi, tokenized assets, and payment solutions. Previously, developers had to break operations into multiple transactions or use bundles, which lacked the same atomic guarantees. Key changes in V1 include moving computational resource limits and priority fees into transaction settings for easier infrastructure access and removing Address Lookup Tables (ALTs). While removing ALTs simplifies transactions, it increases their size as accounts are now included directly. Analysis shows over 62% of legacy v0 transactions used at least one ALT. The upgrade arrives as Solana sees significant growth, with nearly $8 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL) and over $4 billion in real-world assets on the network. However, analysts note that broader adoption and increased transaction activity do not automatically follow technical improvements. Operators, including RPC providers, indexers, validators, and wallet providers, must update their systems to support the new transaction format. Specific actions include updating software versions and correctly parsing the new V1 structure.

cryptonews.ru17 h fa

Solana Triples Its Transaction Processing Capacity. What's Next?

cryptonews.ru17 h fa

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

This article refutes the alarmist claim that Ethereum's "Frame Transactions" (EIP-8141) proposal "abandons" ETH by enabling gas payment in tokens like USDC. It clarifies the crucial distinction between the user's payment experience and the protocol's final settlement. Currently, a user must hold ETH to pay gas fees. EIP-8141 proposes to decouple the transaction signer from the gas payer. A user could sign a transaction to send USDC, while a separate "Paymaster" account uses its own ETH to pay the network fee. The user then reimburses the Paymaster in USDC. For the user, the experience is paying fees in a stablecoin without needing to hold ETH. For the Ethereum protocol, gas is still paid in ETH. The goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of gas management—similar to how one pays in their local currency abroad while the merchant receives local currency. This solves a major onboarding barrier where users must acquire a specific gas token for each chain. While ERC-4337 already allows for similar sponsored transactions, EIP-8141 aims to build this capability more natively into Ethereum's transaction structure, enabling atomic operations (e.g., combined approval and swap) and greater flexibility. Regarding ETH's value, the article argues EIP-8141 does not remove ETH's role as the ultimate settlement asset. Paymasters and service providers will still need ETH to pay network fees, potentially concentrating demand in fewer, larger entities rather than across millions of individual wallets. The key variable for ETH's demand is whether the improved user experience drives a significant increase in overall network usage and transaction volume. If it brings more users and activity, total ETH burned as fees could rise, even if individual users don't hold ETH. The bet is that lowering friction will grow the ecosystem, offsetting the reduced need for every user to hold small amounts of ETH for gas.

marsbit2 giorni fa 04:26

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

marsbit2 giorni fa 04:26

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

Title: Refuting the "Ethereum Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does Paying Gas Without ETH Really Mean? The debate sparked by Vitalik Buterin's discussion of EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions), which suggests users could pay transaction fees without holding ETH, has led to extreme claims that ETH will lose its value. However, this perspective misunderstands the proposal. Currently, an Ethereum user initiating a transaction must also pay the network's Gas fee in ETH. EIP-8141 aims to decouple these actions. It allows a transaction to be split into separate "frames." A user could sign a transaction to, for example, send USDC, while a separate Paymaster account pays the required ETH Gas fee on their behalf. The user would then settle the cost with the Paymaster using USDC or another token. From the user's perspective, they pay in a stablecoin without interacting with ETH. Crucially, from the Ethereum protocol's perspective, the Gas is still paid in ETH; only the settlement layer between the user and Paymaster changes. This concept isn't entirely new; ERC-4337's Account Abstraction already allows similar Gas sponsorship. EIP-8141 seeks to integrate this capability more natively. The core goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of Gas, similar to how one pays with a credit card abroad without handling the local currency. It also enables atomic operations, like bundling token approval with a swap, which would revert together if the swap fails. Regarding ETH's value, the argument that "no ETH is needed" is incorrect. While users may not hold ETH, Paymasters and services must still acquire and spend ETH to pay network fees on the backend. The demand for ETH shifts from being distributed across millions of user wallets to being concentrated in the balances of these service providers. The key variable is whether this improved usability attracts significant new users and increases overall network activity. If it does, total ETH burned in fees could rise substantially. If it doesn't, the change merely reshuffles who holds the ETH needed for Gas. In summary, EIP-8141 aims to lower the entry barrier by hiding Gas complexity, betting that this will drive broader adoption and increase the fundamental utility—and thus demand—for the Ethereum network and ETH itself.

marsbit09/12 08:00

Refuting the Ethereum 'Abandoning' ETH Narrative: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without ETH?

marsbit09/12 08:00

Trezor Cryptocurrency Wallet Manufacturer Discloses Number of Victims in Data Leak

Cryptocurrency wallet manufacturer Trezor has disclosed that approximately 347,000 customer email addresses were compromised due to a breach at its third-party email service provider, Brevo. The attackers used this access to send phishing emails from Trezor's official domain on September 9, which contained a link to a malicious application designed to steal wallet recovery information. Trezor blocked the fraudulent download site within 20 minutes, but not before around 2,500 individuals had clicked the link. The company emphasized that Trezor hardware wallets and user accounts were not directly hacked. Funds remain safe for users who only clicked the link but did not submit their recovery seed. The broader Brevo breach reportedly affected 120 customer accounts, enabling phishing campaigns impersonating various companies. Trezor has warned users to delete suspicious emails, avoid clicking links, and never share personal information or wallet recovery phrases. If a user has already entered wallet details via the phishing link, they should immediately transfer all funds to a new wallet. In response to this incident, Trezor pledged to review its supplier relationships and security requirements. This marks the company's second data breach in recent months, following an August incident where personal data of 13,700 customers was exposed after a hack at shipping service ShipMonk.

cryptonews.ru09/11 13:52

Trezor Cryptocurrency Wallet Manufacturer Discloses Number of Victims in Data Leak

cryptonews.ru09/11 13:52

活动图片