# Lending Articoli collegati

Il Centro Notizie HTX fornisce gli articoli più recenti e le analisi più approfondite su "Lending", coprendo tendenze di mercato, aggiornamenti sui progetti, sviluppi tecnologici e politiche normative nel settore crypto.

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Jupiter Lend and Kamino, the two leading lending protocols on Solana, are embroiled in a public dispute over Jupiter’s “risk isolation” claims. The conflict began when Jupiter promoted its lending product as having isolated risk between pools, but critics—led by Kamino—argue Jupiter’s design actually allows cross-contamination through rehypothecation (reusing collateral across pools). Kamino’s co-founder publicly accused Jupiter of misleading users, prompting community backlash. Jupiter later deleted earlier promotional content and acknowledged the description was inaccurate. The debate centers on differing interpretations of “risk isolation,” with Jupiter defending its model as a balance between safety and capital efficiency. Multicoin Capital, a Kamino investor, escalated the situation by accusing Jupiter of incompetence or intentional deception. In response, the Solana Foundation urged both sides to collaborate rather than compete internally, highlighting the larger opportunity in expanding the DeFi lending market overall. The clash reflects growing tension as Jupiter Lend rapidly gains market share in a shrinking TVL environment, turning former allies into rivals in Solana’s competitive lending landscape.

Odaily星球日报12/08 05:09

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Odaily星球日报12/08 05:09

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Summary: Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino, centered on the definition of "risk isolation." The conflict began when Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, accused Jupiter Lend of misleading users. He argued that Jupiter's early marketing claimed its lending pools were "risk-isolated," preventing cross-contamination between assets. However, Kamino contends that Jupiter Lend's design, which allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools, creates a risk of contagion, contradicting its marketing. In response, Jupiter's COO, Kash Dhanda, admitted the initial "zero contagion risk" social media posts were inaccurate and apologized. The debate highlights a core disagreement on the definition of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue the term has design flexibility, noting that while pools share a liquidity layer, each has independent parameters. Kamino and its allies insist that any rehypothecation negates true risk isolation. The dispute escalated when Tushar Jain, a partner at Kamino investor Multicoin Capital, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of being either incompetent or deliberately misleading. In contrast, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu urged for cooperation, emphasizing that the Solana lending market is much smaller than Ethereum's and that internal conflict only helps competitors. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intense competition. Kamino was long the Solana lending leader, but Jupiter Lend has rapidly gained significant market share. In a tighter market with reduced liquidity and heightened safety concerns, the competition between the two protocols has become increasingly fierce.

marsbit12/08 10:22

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

marsbit12/08 10:22

What Do the Smart Money Buying AAVE at Lows Actually See?

Amidst market volatility, major players like a "whale" (recovering from a forced liquidation) and investment firm Multicoin Capital have been accumulating AAVE positions, suggesting "smart money" is building structural long-term holdings. Aave dominates the on-chain lending sector, capturing ~87% of Ethereum-based lending revenue. Key insights from an analysis include: Aave's revenue shows strong cyclicality but with a significantly higher baseline—even conservative bearish projections estimate monthly revenues (~$6M) above previous bull market highs. Its native stablecoin GHO has grown organically to over $400M, demonstrating sustainable demand. Aave's buyback program has executed consistently, repurchasing 0.8% of total supply in 8 months, adding deflationary pressure. The protocol is evolving from a lending platform into a foundational liquidity layer, with GHO enabling vertical integration and revenue diversification. Despite short-term volatility, Aave presents a compelling long-term infrastructure investment due to its mature revenue model, expanding utility, and deflationary tokenomics.

Odaily星球日报12/08 11:16

What Do the Smart Money Buying AAVE at Lows Actually See?

Odaily星球日报12/08 11:16

Solana Lending Internal Conflict: The Power Struggle Behind Foundation Mediation

Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino. The conflict originated from Jupiter's earlier marketing claims that its lending product featured "risk isolation," implying that different lending pools would not be exposed to cross-contagion in the event of an asset failure. However, after Jupiter Lend launched, the market observed that its design did not align with the conventional understanding of risk isolation. The protocol allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools to improve capital efficiency, which critics argue creates potential channels for risk contagion. Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, publicly accused Jupiter of misleading users with false advertising and subsequently blocked a migration tool from Kamino to Jupiter Lend. The core of the debate lies in differing interpretations of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue their model offers a balanced approach with independent pool configurations, while Kamino and its allies insist that any form of rehypothecation negates true risk isolation and constitutes a failure in disclosure. The dispute drew reactions from key ecosystem players. Multicoin Capital, an investor in Kamino, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of either incompetence or intentional deception. In contrast, the Solana Foundation President, Lily Liu, called for unity, urging the two projects to focus on growing the overall market share against competitors like Ethereum rather than engaging in internal conflict. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intensifying competition in a shrinking market. Jupiter Lend has been rapidly capturing market share from the formerly dominant Kamino since its launch. In a tighter, post-market-crash environment where safety is a paramount concern, Kamino seized on a perceived vulnerability in Jupiter's product design to launch a competitive attack. The incident highlights the fierce battle for dominance in Solana's DeFi lending sector.

比推12/08 16:55

Solana Lending Internal Conflict: The Power Struggle Behind Foundation Mediation

比推12/08 16:55

SemiLiquid Unveils Programmable Credit Protocol, Built with Avalanche, Advancing Institutional Credit on Tokenised Collateral

SemiLiquid has launched its Programmable Credit Protocol (PCP) at Abu Dhabi Finance Week 2025, a custody-native infrastructure enabling institutions to access credit using digital and tokenized assets as collateral without transferring them. This breakthrough, developed in Abu Dhabi and backed by a successful pilot with partners including Franklin Templeton, Zodia Custody, and Avalanche, demonstrates enforceable bilateral credit within digital asset custody. The pilot used Franklin Templeton’s tokenized fund BENJI as collateral, allowing yield retention while eliminating counterparty risk. PCP merges traditional finance trust with programmable asset efficiency, addressing legacy inefficiencies in institutional credit. SemiLiquid plans a global rollout and Phase II expansion in early 2026.

TheNewsCrypto12/08 17:18

SemiLiquid Unveils Programmable Credit Protocol, Built with Avalanche, Advancing Institutional Credit on Tokenised Collateral

TheNewsCrypto12/08 17:18

Everyone is MicroStrategy: When JPMorgan Starts Accepting BTC as Collateral, Will You Still Sell Your Coins?

The article discusses a major shift on Wall Street, where major banks like JPMorgan, Citi, and Bank of America have reportedly begun accepting Bitcoin as collateral for cash loans. This move, revealed by MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor, signifies Bitcoin's evolution into a "pristine collateral" asset, comparable to U.S. Treasuries or gold. It allows holders to access liquidity without selling their Bitcoin, avoiding capital gains taxes and maintaining exposure to potential price appreciation. This development effectively democratizes the "Buy, Borrow, Die" strategy previously accessible only to large institutions and the ultra-wealthy. It is framed as a critical step in Bitcoin's monetary evolution, enabling credit creation. A "credit flywheel" is described: rising BTC prices increase collateral value, allowing for larger loans, which can be used to purchase more assets, potentially driving prices higher. This shift also suggests a weakening of restrictive regulations like the SEC's SAB 121, transferring power from crypto-native exchanges to traditional financial institutions. The article concludes with a warning about the risks of leverage, as price drops could trigger mass, forced liquidations. It offers advice for investors: adopt a "debt mindset" to use loans for expenses while holding assets, cautiously manage loan-to-value ratios to avoid margin calls, and watch for a resurgence of regulated, compliant CeFi platforms.

marsbitIeri 08:21

Everyone is MicroStrategy: When JPMorgan Starts Accepting BTC as Collateral, Will You Still Sell Your Coins?

marsbitIeri 08:21

When Curators Become a Risk Variable in DeFi Lending, How Can Algorithms Reshape the Market?

The article argues that the current "Curator" model in DeFi lending, as seen in protocols like Morpho and Euler, reintroduces human moral risk and inefficiency. It traces the evolution of lending markets, highlighting that early pooled models (e.g., Compound, Aave) sacrificed lender risk control for borrower convenience, while isolated markets (e.g., Morpho Blue) fragmented liquidity. Curator vaults attempted to bridge this gap but reintroduced trust assumptions and discretionary decision-making. The author proposes a new paradigm inspired by traditional order books: a two-tier architecture separating risk definition from order matching. In this model (exemplified by Avon), lenders deposit into isolated, parameter-defined "strategies" (retaining full risk control), while a shared order book algorithmically aggregates and routes borrower requests across compatible strategies atomically. This eliminates the need for human curators, enhances transparency, and improves liquidity utilization. The approach also benefits RWA by allowing compliance at the strategy level while pooling global liquidity. Built on high-performance chains like MegaETH, this CLOB-based system aims to automate lending coordination without sacrificing lender autonomy or borrower experience.

比推Ieri 14:51

When Curators Become a Risk Variable in DeFi Lending, How Can Algorithms Reshape the Market?

比推Ieri 14:51

活动图片

Regulatory Policy

Bitcoin