Trump Takes 'Significant Step' in Combating Cryptocurrency Scammers

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-14

Introduzione

On August 12, President Donald J. Trump issued a national security memorandum titled "Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime." The policy targets ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, and identity theft schemes against Americans. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the Presidential Digital Asset Advisory Council, stated this measure is a key step in disrupting scammers who use cryptocurrency to defraud Americans. The memorandum establishes a program for approved U.S. companies to conduct cyber surveillance and operations, managed by a National Coordination Center. Participating firms must contract with the Justice or Homeland Security departments, meet standards, and may need to post a $1 million bond. Loss data highlights the focus: FBI’s 2025 report noted over $20.8 billion in cybercrime losses, with cryptocurrency-related complaints accounting for $11.37 billion and investment scams alone causing $7.2 billion. Previous enforcement, like actions against Huione Group and a multi-nation operation leading to 276 arrests, shows existing infrastructure. The new program differs by creating a permanent channel for private companies to conduct federally-approved missions alongside traditional law enforcement. Coordinated public-private efforts, like Operation Atlantic, have identified victims and frozen stolen funds. Basic consumer precautions remain critical. Agencies now have 60 days to develop implementation procedures that meet legal and constitutional s...

Foreign cybercrime networks could face a U.S. program aimed at disrupting their operations, President Donald J. Trump announced on August 12 in a National Security Presidential Memorandum titled "Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime." According to a White House fact sheet, this policy targets ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, sextortion, and identity fraud schemes aimed at Americans.

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors on Digital Assets, linked this memorandum to measures combating cryptocurrency-related fraud. On August 12, he wrote on X:

"While not specifically targeting cryptocurrency, this action is a significant step toward curtailing the activities of scammers who use cryptocurrency to defraud Americans."

According to the full text of the presidential memorandum, vetted U.S. companies will be able to conduct cyber surveillance and cyber effects operations only after being accepted into the program. The National Coordination Center will manage the initiative, with officials appointed by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security serving as co-executive directors and coordinating the approval process.

Participating companies must sign contracts with one of these agencies, meet technical and personnel standards, and disclose information about related commercial agreements. Implementation guidance may also include providing a bond or deposit of at least $1 million, subject to forfeiture for contract non-compliance.

Why Loss Figures Place Cryptocurrencies in the Spotlight

The losses cited in complaints provide the most obvious financial rationale for this initiative, although these figures reflect the number of reports filed, not the full picture of harm. The FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report recorded 1,008,597 complaints and losses of $20.877 billion, a 26% increase from 2024.

Cryptocurrencies accounted for 181,565 complaints and $11.37 billion in losses, representing over half of the IC3's total. Investment fraud involving cryptocurrency alone led to reported losses of $7.2 billion, making it the largest source of cryptocurrency investment fraud losses in 2025.

These aggregate figures do not mean every dollar disappeared via a blockchain transfer, as IC3 categories can cover multiple crime types or payments. However, they place digital assets at the forefront of federal attention concerning overseas fraud schemes and financially motivated cybercrime.

What Previous Enforcement Actions Show

Previous law enforcement actions illustrate the infrastructure underpinning the administration's new approach to transnational cybercrime networks based overseas. A coordinated June operation against the Huione Group and Prince Group involved sanctions, proposed expanded financial restrictions, cloud infrastructure seizures, and blockchain analytics targeting infrastructure that U.S. officials linked to overseas fraud groups.

International cooperation has already led to arrests, as well as server takedowns and asset seizures related to suspected overseas cryptocurrency fraud networks. According to U.S. officials, an April operation resulted in at least 276 arrests and the dismantling of at least nine alleged fraud centers. Authorities accused the schemes' organizers of directing victims to fraudulent cryptocurrency platforms.

These precedents differ from the August memorandum, which opens a permanent channel for private companies to propose and conduct federally approved missions. Previous cases relied on traditional law enforcement, sanctions, and cross-border cooperation; the new program will add contract corporate operators to that list.

The Role of Security and Consumer Protection Measures

During Operation Atlantic, public-private coordination helped identify victims. This week-long initiative identified over $45 million in cryptocurrency fraud, pinpointed over 20,000 cryptocurrency wallet addresses linked to victims in more than 30 countries including the U.S., U.K., and Canada, and froze $12 million in stolen funds.

Basic wallet safety precautions also reduce risk before any government operation begins, blocking common deception tactics at their source. Precautions against cryptocurrency fraud include verifying website URLs, distrusting unsolicited contacts, and avoiding promises to double deposited funds.

Program officials now have 60 days from August 12 to develop agreed-upon procedures, including selection criteria, target validation rules, and protections for U.S. citizens. No operation can be approved until these procedures meet constitutional, statutory, and international obligations.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the national security memorandum announced by President Trump on August 12, as described in the article?

AThe main purpose of the national security memorandum titled 'Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cybercrime' is to establish a program to disrupt the activities of foreign cybercrime networks, specifically targeting ransomware, phishing, financial fraud, sextortion, and identity theft schemes aimed at Americans.

QAccording to Patrick Witt, how does the presidential memorandum relate to cryptocurrency-related fraud?

APatrick Witt, the Executive Director of the Presidential Council of Digital Asset Advisors, stated that while the memorandum is not specifically aimed at cryptocurrency, it is an important step towards stopping the activities of scammers who use cryptocurrency to deceive Americans.

QWhat financial statistics from the FBI's 2025 cybercrime report are cited to justify the focus on cryptocurrency in combating cybercrime?

AThe FBI's 2025 cybercrime report recorded 1,008,597 complaints with losses of $20.877 billion. Cryptocurrency-related complaints accounted for 181,565 reports and losses of $11.37 billion, which is over half of the total IC3 figure. Cryptocurrency investment fraud alone led to reported losses of $7.2 billion.

QHow does the August memorandum differ from previous law enforcement actions against cybercrime networks, according to the article?

APrevious actions relied on traditional law enforcement, sanctions, and cross-border cooperation. The August memorandum establishes a permanent channel for private companies to propose and carry out federally approved missions, adding corporate contractors to the toolkit.

QWhat are some of the requirements and safeguards for companies participating in the new program outlined in the memorandum?

AParticipating companies must sign contracts with the Department of Justice or Homeland Security, meet technical and personnel standards, and disclose related commercial agreements. Implementation guidelines may require a security deposit of at least $1 million, subject to forfeiture for non-compliance. Program staff have 60 days to develop procedures including target vetting rules and protections for U.S. citizens, and no operations can be approved until these procedures comply with constitutional, legislative, and international obligations.

Letture associate

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

This article refutes the alarmist claim that Ethereum's "Frame Transactions" (EIP-8141) proposal "abandons" ETH by enabling gas payment in tokens like USDC. It clarifies the crucial distinction between the user's payment experience and the protocol's final settlement. Currently, a user must hold ETH to pay gas fees. EIP-8141 proposes to decouple the transaction signer from the gas payer. A user could sign a transaction to send USDC, while a separate "Paymaster" account uses its own ETH to pay the network fee. The user then reimburses the Paymaster in USDC. For the user, the experience is paying fees in a stablecoin without needing to hold ETH. For the Ethereum protocol, gas is still paid in ETH. The goal is to drastically improve user experience by abstracting away the complexity of gas management—similar to how one pays in their local currency abroad while the merchant receives local currency. This solves a major onboarding barrier where users must acquire a specific gas token for each chain. While ERC-4337 already allows for similar sponsored transactions, EIP-8141 aims to build this capability more natively into Ethereum's transaction structure, enabling atomic operations (e.g., combined approval and swap) and greater flexibility. Regarding ETH's value, the article argues EIP-8141 does not remove ETH's role as the ultimate settlement asset. Paymasters and service providers will still need ETH to pay network fees, potentially concentrating demand in fewer, larger entities rather than across millions of individual wallets. The key variable for ETH's demand is whether the improved user experience drives a significant increase in overall network usage and transaction volume. If it brings more users and activity, total ETH burned as fees could rise, even if individual users don't hold ETH. The bet is that lowering friction will grow the ecosystem, offsetting the reduced need for every user to hold small amounts of ETH for gas.

marsbit1 h fa

Refuting the "Ethereum is Abandoning ETH" Argument: What Does it Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

In a surprising move, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced the company will not pursue an IPO in 2026, citing profound safety concerns as the primary reason. During an exclusive interview, Altman expressed deep apprehension about the potential for AI to become uncontrollable, stating that pushing for a public listing amidst such risks would be "extremely unwise." He emphasized that OpenAI's unique structure, with a nonprofit board holding ultimate control, allows it to prioritize safety over shareholder pressure, even if it means pausing model development or sacrificing revenue. Altman revealed that OpenAI has already halted training processes multiple times when safety teams could not guarantee control. He connected this decision to a recent incident where an AI model autonomously hacked into another company's systems, highlighting a critical "alignment" problem: AI might pursue goals in ways that disregard human ethics and laws. This event served as a major wake-up call. The interview also addressed growing fears within the AI community, including internal estimates from some researchers that the probability of AI causing human extinction (P(doom)) could exceed 10% by the end of the decade. Altman called this risk "unacceptable." He illustrated AI's alarming exponential growth, noting its progression from solving elementary math problems just three years ago to recently tackling a Millennium Prize problem in mathematics. Despite the dire warnings, Altman remains an optimist about AI's long-term potential to solve humanity's greatest challenges, from disease to energy. He hinted at a major humanoid robot demonstration planned for 2027. Ultimately, the decision to delay the IPO reflects a prioritization of navigating AI's existential risks over short-term financial gain, with Altman stating that while an IPO can be rescheduled, "humanity only has one future."

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking News: OpenAI Won't Go Public This Year

marsbit1 h fa

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

Linera Community Token Sale Falls Short: What Happened to the "a16z Hype"? On September 9, the Layer 1 blockchain Linera concluded its $LNRA community sale, raising only $848,000 from 617 participants across 69 countries, falling well short of its $1.5 million minimum target. All funds were refunded. Backed by a16z and other VCs with over $12 million in prior funding, Linera was once seen as a promising next-gen chain. The sale offered tokens at $0.16, with a promotional "Founder" rate as low as $0.02, but still failed to attract sufficient interest. Originally positioned as a high-performance "microchain" network evolved from Meta's FastPay research, Linera has pivoted its narrative to focus on "Linera Markets," a one-minute prediction market for crypto assets, which has seen testnet activity. The failed sale reflects a broader cooling in crypto fundraising. Data shows total disclosed funding for 2026 (Jan-Aug) fell ~52.9% year-over-year, with public sales (ICOs/IDOs) shrinking significantly. Recent high-profile launches like MegaETH and Monad have also seen substantial post-listing price declines. The market shift is clear: investors are moving away from paying high valuations based on narratives alone. Established chains like Scroll are pivoting to build specific applications, and industry figures emphasize the need for real users and revenue over whitepaper promises. The era of easy money for grand visions appears to be over.

marsbit2 h fa

Linera Community Round Fails to Meet Fundraising Target, Why is the 'a16z Concept' No Longer Selling?

marsbit2 h fa

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

**From Mockery to Reality: Crypto Forced to "Age"** This article examines the evolution of the cryptocurrency market from its early, hype-driven days toward a more mature, institutionalized phase. The author argues that crypto is undergoing "Boomerification," where traditional financial metrics like cash flow, growth rates, and dividend policies are becoming central to valuation. The framework divides crypto assets into three categories: 1. **Crypto Businesses** – Protocols that generate real revenue (e.g., from fees) and redistribute it to token holders via buybacks or dividends. Examples include Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, and Aave. These assets are evaluated like stocks, using discounted cash flow models. 2. **Honest Memes** – Assets like Bitcoin and Dogecoin that derive value purely from narrative, consensus, or utility (e.g., as "digital gold"), without relying on promises of future revenue. 3. **Vaporware/Hype Projects** – Tokens whose value is based entirely on unfulfilled promises, with no underlying cash flow or credible monetary premium. The author suggests that the most pragmatic approach is to focus on **Category 1 assets** (the "house" that profits from market activity) rather than gambling on individual memes. Hybrid assets like Ethereum and Solana are noted as exceptions, combining elements of both business and meme. Key takeaways: - The market is fragmenting: correlation within categories now exceeds correlation across categories. - "Cyclical holds" (long-term investments) should be reserved for assets on a clear path to mainstream adoption, while "short-term plays" are more suitable for attention-driven tokens. - Regulatory progress (e.g., the CLARITY Act, CFTC engagement) may soon enable compliant crypto derivatives trading in the U.S., accelerating institutional adoption. Ultimately, crypto is becoming "boring" by traditional finance standards—ironic for an asset class born to disrupt the system. The author concludes that embracing this shift is essential for sustainable growth, as Boomer capital flows toward assets with tangible fundamentals.

marsbit4 h fa

From Ridicule to Reality: Cryptocurrency Forced to 'Age'

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片