Stablecoin Yields May Boost US Bank Deposits: Patrick Witt

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-12

Introduzione

Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, argues that the debate over stablecoin yields overlooks a broader macroeconomic benefit. Contrary to concerns from banking groups that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits, Witt suggests that under the GENIUS Act framework, compliant stablecoins may actually bring new capital into the U.S. banking system. He explains that global demand for USD is significant, and when foreigners purchase U.S.-issued stablecoins, it represents net new capital entering American banks. This discussion occurs amid ongoing tension between policymakers, banks, and crypto firms regarding whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest-like returns. Traditional banks, like the American Bankers Association, warn that such yields could threaten bank deposits and advocate for a level regulatory playing field. Crypto industry representatives counter that the GENIUS Act already imposes strict reserve requirements, mandating full backing by cash or cash-equivalents. Witt emphasizes that it is not the payment of yield itself that necessitates bank-like regulation, but rather the lending or rehypothecation of underlying funds—which the GENIUS Act explicitly prohibits.

The recent debate concerning stablecoin yields may be neglecting a wider macroeconomic dynamic, as per Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

On March 11, Witt posted on X, mentioning that the stablecoins’ complaint with the GENIUS Act framework could really influence new funds into the U.S. banking system instead of draining deposits away from it, as some banking groups have alerted.

Witt mentioned that lost in the rewards/yield debate is how GENIUS-compliant stablecoins will really lead to deposit inflows. The global demand for USD is huge. Foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from a US-based issuer, and that is net new capital setting its foot into the American banking system.

The comment from Witt comes amid the continuing clash of policymakers, banks and crypto firms over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to permit rewards or interest-like incentives to holders.

Concerns of the Market Players

Traditional banking groups have alerted that yield-bearing stablecoins could influence deposits from the US banking system. The latest survey authorised by the American Bankers Association found that consumers widely backed limitations on stablecoin rewards, voicing concerns regarding financial risk.

The CEO and ABA President Rob Nichols mentioned earlier this week that our industry welcomes competition and revolution. Although he alerted that the regulator should avoid making an uneven playing field where crypto companies offer bank-like products without following equivalent regulatory standards.

Crypto industry players have claimed that stablecoin issuers so far witness strict reserve needs under the GENIUS Act, which requires tokens to be completely supported by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

Witt also had the same concerns at the start of this month. It is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that requires bank-like regulations, but instead the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance.

The GENIUS Act deliberately restricts stablecoin issuers from doing the latter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

CBI Arrests Darwin Labs Co-Founder in Multi-Crore GainBitcoin Scam

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to Patrick Witt, how could GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins potentially affect the US banking system?

APatrick Witt argues that GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins could lead to deposit inflows into the US banking system, as foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from US-based issuers, bringing net new capital into American banks.

QWhat concern have traditional banking groups raised about yield-bearing stablecoins?

ATraditional banking groups have warned that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the US banking system.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association survey find regarding consumer attitudes toward stablecoin rewards?

AThe American Bankers Association survey found that consumers widely supported limitations on stablecoin rewards, expressing concerns about financial risk.

QWhat regulatory requirement does the GENIUS Act impose on stablecoin issuers regarding their reserves?

AThe GENIUS Act requires stablecoin tokens to be fully backed by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

QAccording to Witt, what specific activity (not the payment of yield itself) would require bank-like regulations for stablecoin issuers?

AWitt stated that it is not the payment of yield itself, but the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance that would require bank-like regulations.

Letture associate

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit22 min fa

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit22 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit30 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit30 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手32 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手32 min fa

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcrypto34 min fa

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcrypto34 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手48 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手48 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Cosa è $BANK

Banca AI: Un Passo Rivoluzionario nel Futuro della Banca Introduzione In un'era caratterizzata da rapidi progressi tecnologici, Banca AI si trova all'incrocio tra intelligenza artificiale (AI) e servizi bancari. Questo progetto innovativo mira a ridefinire il panorama finanziario, migliorando l'efficienza operativa, le misure di sicurezza e le esperienze dei clienti attraverso il potere dell'AI. Mentre ci impegniamo in questa esplorazione di Banca AI, esamineremo cosa comporta il progetto, le sue dinamiche operative, il suo contesto storico e i traguardi significativi. Cos'è Banca AI? Alla sua essenza, Banca AI rappresenta un'iniziativa trasformativa volta a integrare l'intelligenza artificiale in varie operazioni bancarie. Questo progetto sfrutta le capacità dell'AI per automatizzare processi, migliorare i protocolli di gestione del rischio e potenziare l'interazione con i clienti attraverso servizi personalizzati. Gli obiettivi principali di Banca AI includono: Automazione delle Funzioni Bancarie: Sfruttando le tecnologie AI, Banca AI mira ad automatizzare compiti di routine, riducendo il carico sulle risorse umane e aumentando l'efficienza. Miglioramento della Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto utilizza algoritmi AI per prevedere e identificare i rischi, rafforzando così le misure di sicurezza contro le frodi e altre minacce. Personalizzazione dei Servizi Bancari: Banca AI si concentra sull'offrire prodotti e servizi finanziari su misura analizzando i dati e i comportamenti dei clienti. Miglioramento dell'Esperienza del Cliente: L'implementazione di soluzioni guidate dall'AI, come chatbot e assistenti virtuali, mira a fornire agli utenti interazioni più umane, rivoluzionando il modo in cui i clienti si relazionano con le banche. Con questi obiettivi, Banca AI si posiziona come un attore cruciale nel rendere la banca più efficiente, sicura e centrata sull'utente. Chi è il Creatore di Banca AI? I dettagli riguardanti il creatore di Banca AI rimangono sconosciuti. Pertanto, non è stata identificata alcuna persona o organizzazione specifica nelle informazioni disponibili. L'anonimato che circonda la nascita del progetto solleva domande, ma non sminuisce la sua ambiziosa visione e obiettivi. Chi sono gli Investitori di Banca AI? Simile al creatore del progetto, informazioni specifiche riguardo gli investitori o le organizzazioni di supporto di Banca AI non sono state divulgate. Senza queste informazioni, è difficile delineare il sostegno finanziario e istituzionale che potrebbe spingere il progetto in avanti. Tuttavia, l'importanza di avere una solida base di investimento è fondamentale per sostenere lo sviluppo in un campo così innovativo. Come Funziona Banca AI? Banca AI opera su più fronti innovativi, concentrandosi su fattori unici che la differenziano dai framework bancari tradizionali. Di seguito sono riportate le caratteristiche operative chiave: Automazione: Applicando algoritmi di machine learning, Banca AI automatizza vari processi manuali all'interno delle banche. Ciò si traduce in una riduzione dei costi operativi e consente ai lavoratori umani di reindirizzare i propri sforzi verso attività più strategiche. Gestione Avanzata del Rischio: L'integrazione dell'AI nelle pratiche di gestione del rischio fornisce alle banche strumenti per prevedere con precisione potenziali minacce come le frodi, garantendo che le informazioni e i beni dei clienti rimangano al sicuro. Raccomandazioni Finanziarie Personalizzate: Attraverso l'apprendimento continuo dalle interazioni con i clienti, i sistemi AI sviluppano una comprensione sfumata delle esigenze degli utenti, consentendo loro di offrire consigli su misura per le decisioni finanziarie. Interazioni Migliorate con i Clienti: Utilizzando chatbot e assistenti virtuali alimentati dall'AI, Banca AI consente un'esperienza cliente più coinvolgente, permettendo agli utenti di risolvere rapidamente le loro richieste, riducendo così i tempi di attesa e migliorando i livelli di soddisfazione. Tutte queste caratteristiche operative posizionano Banca AI come un pioniere nel settore bancario, stabilendo nuovi standard per la fornitura di servizi e l'eccellenza operativa. Timeline di Banca AI Comprendere la traiettoria di Banca AI richiede uno sguardo al suo contesto storico. Di seguito è riportata una timeline che evidenzia traguardi e sviluppi importanti: Inizio 2010: La concettualizzazione dell'integrazione dell'AI nei servizi bancari ha cominciato a guadagnare attenzione mentre le istituzioni bancarie riconoscevano i potenziali benefici. 2018: Si è verificato un aumento significativo nell'implementazione delle tecnologie AI quando le banche hanno iniziato a utilizzare strumenti AI come i chatbot per servizi clienti di base e sistemi di gestione del rischio per migliorare la sicurezza. 2023: La sofisticazione dell'AI ha continuato ad avanzare, con l'introduzione dell'AI generativa per compiti più complessi come l'elaborazione di documenti e l'analisi degli investimenti in tempo reale. Quest'anno ha segnato un significativo salto nelle capacità offerte alle banche dalla tecnologia AI. 2024-Stato Attuale: A partire da quest'anno, Banca AI è su una traiettoria ascendente, con ricerche e sviluppi in corso pronti a migliorare ulteriormente le capacità nelle operazioni bancarie. L'esplorazione continua delle applicazioni AI suggerisce sviluppi entusiasmanti in arrivo. Punti Chiave su Banca AI Integrazione dell'AI nella Banca: Banca AI si concentra sull'adozione dell'intelligenza artificiale per snellire i processi bancari e migliorare le esperienze degli utenti. Focus su Automazione e Gestione del Rischio: Il progetto enfatizza fortemente queste aree, mirando a spostare il carico di compiti di routine mentre migliora le strutture di sicurezza attraverso analisi predittive. Soluzioni Bancarie Personalizzate: Sfruttando i dati dei clienti, Banca AI consente servizi bancari su misura che si adattano alle esigenze individuali degli utenti. Impegno per lo Sviluppo: Banca AI rimane impegnata in sforzi di ricerca e sviluppo continuativi, garantendo la sua adattabilità e rilevanza continua man mano che la tecnologia continua a evolversi. Conclusione In sintesi, Banca AI rappresenta un passo cruciale in avanti nell'industria bancaria, sfruttando l'intelligenza artificiale per rimodellare i paradigmi operativi, migliorare la sicurezza e promuovere la soddisfazione del cliente. Nonostante le lacune nelle informazioni riguardo il creatore e gli investitori, gli obiettivi chiari e i meccanismi funzionali di Banca AI forniscono una solida base per la sua continua evoluzione. Mentre la tecnologia AI continua ad avanzare e fondersi con il settore bancario, Banca AI è ben posizionata per avere un impatto significativo sul futuro dei servizi finanziari, migliorando il modo in cui comprendiamo e interagiamo con la banca.

133 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.04.06Aggiornato il 2024.12.03

Come comprare BANK

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Lorenzo ProtocolBANK.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Dopo aver acquistato Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Scambia facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

727 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.05.09Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di BANK BANK sono presentate come di seguito.