SlowMist Flags Snap Store Attack Targeting Crypto Seed Phrases

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-21

Introduzione

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has identified a new Linux-based threat targeting cryptocurrency users through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack trusted publisher accounts by exploiting expired domains, then push malicious updates to popular wallet apps like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. These fake apps prompt users to enter their recovery phrases, which are then stolen, enabling attackers to drain funds. This supply-chain attack exploits user trust in official update channels, making it highly effective. SlowMist warns users to verify publishers and avoid entering seed phrases on unfamiliar platforms, highlighting a growing trend of infrastructure-focused attacks in crypto security.

Blockchain security firm SlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. The company warned that attackers are hijacking long-standing Snap Store publisher accounts and pushing malicious wallet updates through official distribution channels, putting long-time Linux users at risk.

In a post on X, SlowMist chief information security officer 23pds said attackers are abusing expired domains linked to legitimate Snap Store publishers. After regaining control of those domains, the attackers reset account credentials, take over trusted developer accounts, and publish malware disguised as wallet software updates. This tactic gives the attack a dangerous advantage: users often trust updates from established publishers and install them without suspicion.

Once the malicious apps land on a victim’s system, they prompt users to enter crypto wallet recovery phrases. The malware then exfiltrates those phrases, allowing attackers to drain wallets quickly, often before the victim realizes anything went wrong.

Attackers hijack Snap Store publishers using expired domains

The Snap Store is the official app store for Linux, used for the distribution of software that is packaged as “snaps.” It is considered a trusted source by many users, just like the App Store or Microsoft Store, as it provides verified publishers, easy updates, and a centralized distribution.

SlowMist said attackers are targeting publisher accounts tied to domains that have expired. Once a domain expires, criminals can re-register it and gain access to domain-linked email addresses. From there, they can initiate password resets and seize control of Snap Store developer accounts.

This method enables attackers to compromise publishers with active users and existing download histories. Rather than depending on victims to download the malicious new apps, they inject the malware into the regular updates. This supply chain tactic increases the success rate because users are more likely to accept updates and not check all the changes.

SlowMist has identified at least two domains associated with the compromised publisher accounts: “storewise[.]tech” and “vagueentertainment[.]com.” Once the attackers hijacked the accounts, they allegedly used the apps to impersonate popular crypto wallet brands.

Fake wallet apps mimic trusted brands

According to SlowMist, the affected Snap Store apps are clones of popular wallet applications like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet. Attackers use user interfaces that closely resemble legitimate applications, which increases credibility and reduces suspicion.

These apps, after being installed or updated, will ask the user to input their wallet recovery phrase with the intention of wallet setup, sync, or account verification. After the user has provided the wallet recovery phrase, the attacker can use this phrase to restore the wallet and drain its funds without needing any further access to the victim’s device.

This approach remains very effective because seed phrases provide full control of the assets. Even the strongest passwords and device security cannot protect funds once hackers possess the recovery phrase.

Supply-chain hacks grow more damaging

The incident at the Snap Store is part of a larger trend in crypto security, where attackers are moving from exploiting protocols to compromising infrastructure. Instead of attacking smart contracts directly, criminals increasingly target trusted software distribution systems, update channels, and third-party service providers.

CertiK data shared with the media house in December showed crypto hack losses reached $3.3 billion in 2025, even though the number of incidents declined. According to CertiK, the losses were more concentrated in fewer but more serious supply chain events, with $1.45 billion in losses being attributed to only two major incidents.

This trend indicates that attackers are optimizing for scale and impact. With the improvement of DeFi security at the smart contract level, attackers target the weakest links, apps, publishers, and update infrastructure, where trust is the biggest vulnerability.

What users should watch next?

For Linux users who keep crypto, the wallet software download and update processes must be done with extra care. Users need to verify the identity of the publishers, check the official download sources, and avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms. Security teams may also need to monitor Snap Store listings more closely, especially when there are sudden changes in the ownership of publishers.

The takeaway from the SlowMist alert is clear: the greatest danger now often comes from trusted sources, not the obvious phishing scams.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Tom Lee Warns Crypto Markets Could Face Painful Correction in 2026

TagsBlockchaincrypto securitylinuxSmart ContractSupply chain

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the new threat flagged by SlowMist that targets crypto recovery phrases?

ASlowMist has flagged a new Linux-based threat that targets crypto recovery phrases by exploiting trusted apps distributed through the Snap Store. Attackers hijack long-standing publisher accounts and push malicious wallet updates.

QHow do attackers gain control of trusted Snap Store publisher accounts?

AAttackers abuse expired domains linked to legitimate publishers. They re-register the expired domains, gain access to domain-linked email addresses, reset account credentials, and take over the trusted developer accounts.

QWhich popular crypto wallet brands are being impersonated by the malicious apps in this attack?

AThe malicious apps are clones that impersonate popular crypto wallet brands like Exodus, Ledger Live, and Trust Wallet.

QWhy are supply-chain attacks like the one on the Snap Store becoming more damaging according to the article?

ASupply-chain attacks are becoming more damaging because attackers are targeting trusted software distribution systems and update channels, leading to fewer but more serious incidents with concentrated losses, as seen in the $1.45 billion attributed to just two major events in 2025.

QWhat precautions should Linux users take to protect themselves from such threats?

ALinux users should verify the identity of publishers, check official download sources, avoid entering recovery phrases on unfamiliar platforms, and monitor Snap Store listings for sudden changes in publisher ownership.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片