SEC and CFTC signal execution phase for crypto regulation at harmonization meeting

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-29

Introduzione

US financial regulators, the SEC and CFTC, have announced a shift from coordination to execution in crypto regulation. At a harmonization meeting, officials outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority, without waiting for final legislation from Congress. A key initiative, "Project Crypto," aims to create a shared taxonomy for crypto assets, clarify jurisdictional boundaries, and reduce regulatory duplication and uncertainty. The CFTC stated that most crypto assets are not securities, marking a departure from past ambiguity. Planned rulemaking covers tokenized collateral, onshore crypto perpetual derivatives, retail leveraged trading, and treatment of software in DeFi. The goal is to provide regulatory clarity and reduce friction while maintaining market integrity.

US financial regulators signalled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight on Thursday, 29 January.

Senior officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

The remarks came during a rescheduled SEC–CFTC harmonization meeting, where both agencies emphasised regulatory clarity, reduced duplication, and a more coordinated approach to overseeing crypto asset markets.

Regulators move beyond coordination rhetoric

Speaking at the event, Michael S. Selig said the CFTC would begin exercising oversight of the crypto market without waiting for Congress to finalize market structure legislation.

He described the moment as a transition toward implementation. Staff have been directed to draft rules and revisit existing proposals that have contributed to regulatory uncertainty.

Selig said the CFTC would work jointly with the SEC on “Project Crypto.” This is a framework aimed at harmonizing oversight across agencies.

The initiative is designed to establish a shared crypto asset taxonomy. Also, it is to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and reduce overlapping compliance requirements.

Joint taxonomy and jurisdictional clarity

A central focus of the meeting was developing a common classification framework for digital assets. Selig said he agreed with Paul S. Atkins that most crypto assets trading today are not securities.

This position would mark a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

Selig added that CFTC staff have been instructed to work with their SEC counterparts on the joint codification of a crypto asset taxonomy as an interim measure. At the same time, Congress continues to work on broader legislation.

The aim, he said, is to draw clearer jurisdictional lines and avoid leaving market participants “trapped in uncertainty.”

Rulemaking plans span derivatives, collateral, and software

Beyond taxonomy, Selig outlined several areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking.

These include developing rules to support the use of tokenised collateral, creating pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives. Also, the rule will clarify the treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading.

He also announced plans to withdraw earlier proposals that restricted certain event contracts and to begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

In addition, the CFTC will explore whether innovation exemptions or safe harbours are appropriate for software developers and non-custodial systems operating in the decentralized finance space.

Harmonization aimed at reducing regulatory friction

Both agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise rather than a blurring of statutory boundaries.

Selig said substituted compliance and aligned requirements could allow firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity. This is particularly as crypto markets span products traditionally overseen by different regulators.

While recent congressional action has advanced market structure legislation, regulators stressed that the execution phase would proceed independently, using existing authorities to modernise oversight as innovation continues.


Final Thoughts

  • US regulators signalled a move from coordination to implementation, with the SEC and CFTC outlining concrete steps toward joint crypto rulemaking.
  • Planned actions span asset classification, derivatives, tokenised collateral, and software treatment, indicating regulatory execution will move ahead of final legislation.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main shift signaled by US financial regulators regarding crypto oversight on January 29?

AUS financial regulators signaled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight, with the SEC and CFTC outlining plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

QWhat is the name of the joint framework mentioned for harmonizing crypto oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint framework is called 'Project Crypto', aimed at harmonizing oversight, establishing a shared crypto asset taxonomy, clarifying jurisdictional boundaries, and reducing overlapping compliance requirements.

QAccording to Michael S. Selig, what is the classification of most crypto assets trading today?

AMichael S. Selig agreed that most crypto assets trading today are not securities, which marks a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

QWhat are some specific areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking?

AThe CFTC plans to develop rules for tokenised collateral, create pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives, clarify treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading, withdraw earlier proposals restricting certain event contracts, and begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

QHow do the agencies view harmonization in the context of crypto regulation?

ABoth agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise aimed at reducing regulatory friction, allowing firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity, through substituted compliance and aligned requirements.

Letture associate

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit18 min fa

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit18 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit46 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit46 min fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1 h fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片