Putting Markets On-Chain: Canton Network Quietly Becoming the New Backbone for Institutional Finance

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2026-05-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-21

Introduzione

Canton Network: A New Institutional Financial Infrastructure Emerges Visa's rapid three-day approval as a super-validator on Canton Network in March 2026 marks a significant institutional endorsement. Unlike public blockchains like Ethereum, which prioritize transparency, Canton is designed for regulated financial institutions. Its core innovation is built-in data visibility control, where transaction details are only visible to direct participants. This enables institutions like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and DTCC to conduct private, secure business on-chain without exposing sensitive strategies or positions. Canton, developed by Wall Street-focused Digital Asset, emphasizes slow, methodical development to meet stringent institutional requirements. Current on-chain activity, exceeding $9 trillion monthly, involves real balance-sheet operations like tokenized repos, treasury settlements, and collateral movement—not retail speculation. Key applications include JPMorgan's deposit token (JPM Coin), DTCC's U.S. Treasury tokenization, and Visa-enabled atomic settlement, aiming to synchronize asset delivery and payment instantly. The network's CC token is a utility asset, with value tied to real financial activity volume. It features no pre-mine or VC allocations, aligning with institutional preferences for transparency. Canton's 3–5 year vision is to become an "invisible" foundational layer for global finance—facilitating real-time cross-border capital flows, institutional stable...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | jk

I. A Proposal Approved in Three Days

On March 20, 2026, Visa, a globally renowned payment service provider and the logo represented on most bank cards, submitted a governance proposal to Canton Network. According to The Block's report, just three days later, the proposal was approved, and Visa officially became a Canton super validator with the highest weight of Level 10 (Super Validator Weight 10). This was also the first time Visa had ever submitted a blockchain governance proposal.

Within the crypto space, this event might seem like another foray by traditional finance. But if you understand the internal legal and compliance processes of traditional institutions like Visa well enough, you'll realize that approval within three days is rather unusual. Visa's compliance team must have submitted this document with the caution and seriousness of the traditional financial world, and the fact that it received the highest weight indicates that negotiations and due diligence had already been fully completed beforehand. The public saw this proposal, which should be the result of months of collaboration between traditional finance and the crypto world.

In a statement, Rubail Birwadker, Visa's Head of Global Growth Products and Strategic Partnerships, said: "Many banks believe the lack of privacy is the biggest obstacle to moving meaningful business on-chain. By serving as a Canton Network super validator, we bring Visa-level trust, governance, and operational standards to this privacy-preserving blockchain infrastructure, enabling regulated financial institutions to move payments on-chain without upending their existing operating models."

It can be seen that Visa's entry is an endorsement of an already operational, mature institutional network, not a starting point.

Since 2017, in every market cycle, a batch of traditional financial institutions has loudly announced "exploring blockchain," but very few eventually translate into real business. This time, Visa chose to enter the governance layer of the blockchain, holding voting rights and participating in infrastructure decisions. In a statement, Eric Saraniecki, Head of Network Strategy at Digital Asset, a co-founder of Canton Network, said: "Visa's participation confirms that this technology has moved from the experimental stage to being production-ready."

Driven by curiosity about this cooperation, Odaily Planet Daily interviewed the Canton Network team. What exactly facilitated this collaboration? And what made Canton, a long-quiet project, the chosen one?

II. Not More Assets On-Chain, But Putting the Market Itself On-Chain

To understand why Canton can attract Visa, we need to first look at the core differences between Canton and other chains.

The problems Ethereum and Solana solve are: how to get more people involved, how to get more assets on-chain. The problem Canton solves is: how can financial institutions conduct business normally on-chain. They sound like different focuses, but when it comes to specific design, the trade-offs become almost opposite everywhere.

Ethereum's global transparency is an advantage for retail investors but an obstacle for institutions. Take a concrete example: if every buy/sell operation of dollars and euros by a bank's foreign exchange trading desk is visible in real-time, counterparties could immediately adjust their quotes based on this information, significantly increasing the bank's transaction costs. If a market maker's positions and hedging operations were fully public, competitors could simply trade against them, squeezing out profit margins. Repurchase agreements between institutions involve both parties' funding positions and collateral scale; once this data leaks, it poses risks to the entire institution's liquidity management. These limitations are not directly related to regulation; they are dictated by basic business logic.

Even if addresses are not linked to real-name institutions, transparent on-chain trading would change the entire logic of the secondary market. No traditional financial institution wants its trades to be front-run, so designs like Ethereum and Hyperliquid are not optimal choices for large institutions.

Canton's approach is to incorporate data visibility control into the design.

This treatment method builds selective disclosure of data into the protocol layer as a native L1 design, rather than relying on upper-layer applications to patch it. Specifically, only the direct participants in a transaction can see its details; the network completes validation without exposing any sensitive data. Two banks can perform cross-border settlement on the same shared infrastructure, with the transaction completely invisible to all unrelated parties. Competitors can interact on the same network without exposing their respective positions or strategies.

We also inquired about the relevant technical details. Canton's exact words were: "Canton separates the coordination layer (shared across the network) from data visibility (limited to participants), achieved through isolated execution environments and selective synchronization. This allows institutions to trade securely, and competitors to interact, without exposing their respective holdings or strategies. This is the mechanism that enables the real market, not just assets, to operate natively on-chain."

Canton Network told us that the summary of this design logic is: data visibility control is foundational, not an add-on feature.

Therefore, why does Canton's validator list look like an old-money gathering: Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Bank of America, DTCC, Nasdaq, Broadridge, Tradeweb... These institutions are joining because this infrastructure allows them to replicate their traditional financial success on it, which is why liquidity will gradually flow in.

Canton's Super Validator List

III. Wall Street Pedigree, Slow and Steady Work

Canton's creator is Digital Asset Holdings, founded in 2014 by Blythe Masters. Blythe Masters was a star executive at JPMorgan Chase, one of the key pioneers in the CDS field, with deep connections and industry backing on Wall Street. From day one, this company was not making blockchain products for retail; its target customers were those financial institutions with real balance sheets, under strict regulation, needing to operate within legal frameworks.

Regarding its origins, we asked a pointed question: We saw Canton launch in 2023, why did it only fully go live this year?

Canton's answer is, slow and steady work yields fine results.

The Wall Street pedigree determined the entire project's pace. Canton admitted in the interview that this chain took longer than other L1s to reach today because from the start, it was dealing with regulated financial systems, building institutional trust, and how to truly connect to markets with actual business.

This rhythm is completely opposite to the mainstream Web3 narrative. Most public chains pursue rapid launch, rapid ecosystem expansion, rapid hype generation, TGE rollout, and then "the team isn't really sure either." Canton's path is step-by-step negotiation: first secure DTCC, then Goldman Sachs, then JPMorgan Chase, then Visa, introducing real business through their endorsement.

2026 is a turning point, not because of project promotion itself, nor because the crypto world's bear market is starting to shake out, but because above the narrative, the infrastructure has truly met institutional requirements for the first time: real balance sheet activities are operating on it. This is also why now is the best time to pay attention to Canton Network.

"So how much business has been introduced?" we continued to ask.

IV. Canton's On-Chain Activity

Canton's current data is an outlier in the entire blockchain industry, and the nature behind these numbers is very different from most public chains. Currently, Canton Network's monthly processing volume exceeds $9 trillion, with daily transactions reaching hundreds of thousands. The number of ecosystem participants has grown by orders of magnitude over the past three years. These numbers correspond to traditional financial business: tokenized repos, treasury bond settlement, cross-institution collateral mobilization. These are not wash trading but real operations on institutional balance sheets.

We also asked which products are currently mainstream on-chain. Currently, there seem to be several flagship products:

JPMorgan's JPM Coin: In January 2026, JPMorgan's Kinexys division announced the native deployment of JPM Coin to Canton Network. JPM Coin differs in nature from USDT and USDC; it is a deposit token, representing a direct claim on JPMorgan deposits, operating under existing banking regulatory frameworks. For example, two institutions settling a cross-border transaction with JPM Coin on Canton is not fundamentally different from what they do in the traditional system, just much faster settlement and operations no longer limited to business hours. Kinexys currently handles a daily transaction volume between $2-3 billion, with a cumulative total exceeding $1.5 trillion since 2019. This capital flow is about to operate on Canton.

DTCC's U.S. Treasury Tokenization: In December 2025, the U.S. securities depository DTCC announced a partnership with Digital Asset to tokenize a portion of its custodied U.S. Treasuries on Canton, aiming to launch the first version in a controlled production environment in the first half of 2026, then expand based on market demand. DTCC also jointly serves as co-chair of the Canton Foundation with Euroclear, directly participating in network governance.

DTCC processes securities transactions worth over $2 quadrillion annually and is the core of the entire U.S. capital market clearing and settlement system. To use a more intuitive analogy, DTCC's position in traditional finance is somewhat like the People's Bank of China; no one deposits money there, but everyone's stock and bond trades must pass through its backend. The traditional repo market can only operate on business days, stalling after Friday afternoon until Monday. But on Canton, repo transactions can run 24/7, using on-chain U.S. Treasuries as collateral, achieving real-time cross-institution, cross-timezone, weekend-capable funding.

So what will Visa do on Canton?

A core goal described by Canton in the interview is atomic settlement: The buyer's payment and the seller's delivery of assets are completed simultaneously in a single operation, without needing two separate steps or relying on intermediaries to bridge them. For example, currently when an institution buys a batch of bonds, the asset transfer and cash settlement are often two separate processes with a time gap, counterparty risk, and manual reconciliation costs. What Canton aims to achieve is these two things happening at the same time, locked and settled instantly with no time gap. To achieve this goal, capital market infrastructure and payment infrastructure must both be on-chain. Canton has a fairly solid layout on the capital market side; Visa's addition provides a true institutional anchor point on the payments side.

Beyond this, it includes real-time cross-border capital flows, embedding programmable logic into financial transactions, and other blockchain strengths.

Canton believes 2026 is the cycle where infrastructure has truly met institutional requirements for the first time, which is why institutions like Visa are choosing to engage with blockchain infrastructure now.

Other Use Cases Already Running

Tokenized repo is currently the most mature scenario. Repurchase agreements (Repo) are the most common short-term financing tool among financial institutions, simply put, Institution A sells bonds to Institution B for cash while agreeing to buy them back a few days later. Traditionally, this process could only be completed during business hours, and fund settlement had delays. Tokenized repos on Canton have already achieved 24/7 availability and instant settlement; several leading institutions have completed real cross-institution, weekend-covering repo transactions on Canton.

Collateral mobilization is another scenario with real demand. Large financial institutions often need to move collateral from one account or institution to another, e.g., moving bonds held at A to B to meet margin requirements for a derivatives trade. Traditionally, this process took days, during which assets were locked and unavailable for other uses. Canton's settlement model allows this process to be completed nearly in real-time.

Digital bond issuance is another area where Canton has an advantage. Canton mentioned in the interview that it currently holds over half the market share in global digital bond issuance. The reason is Canton can provide complete Delivery versus Payment (DvP), full lifecycle bond management, and multi-party coordination. Bonds can have a complete closed loop from issuance to settlement on-chain, rather than just tokenizing the asset and then relying on off-chain processes to finalize.

Stablecoin settlement is a direction accelerating after Visa's addition, aiming to enable stablecoin payments between institutions to be completed on the same set of compliant infrastructure with data visibility control, rather than detouring through public chains.

Simply put, it's not mentioning RWA, but every sentence is about RWA's needs.

Canton also gave a rough judgment on the upcoming roadmap in the interview: In the medium term, corporate bonds, private credit, and trade finance will follow; longer term, equities are also on this path. From existing use cases to this roadmap, the logic is consistent: the more liquid and the more mature the regulatory framework for an asset class, the sooner it moves.

V. What Does the CC Token Represent?

For broader market participants, what the CC token actually is remains an unavoidable question.

Canton's characterization in the interview is quite direct: CC is a "network utility asset," its value anchored to the volume of real financial activity occurring on the network.

Meaning, demand comes from actual usage; the greater the transaction volume of institutions on Canton, the more CC the network consumes. Long-term drivers for the token include institutional transaction flow, stablecoin settlement volume, on-chain asset totals, and the depth of interoperability between Canton and other networks.

CC has a rather rare setting in token distribution within the Web3 circle: zero pre-mine, zero team allocation, zero VC allocation. All tokens enter the market through fair means. For institutional participants, this setting reduces concerns about "someone holding ultra-low-cost chips, ready to cash out and flee the secondary market at any time." The rules are transparent and equal for all participants.

For ordinary market participants, Canton exists more as backend infrastructure. The way ordinary people will interact with it is more likely through exchanges, wallets, or financial platforms, not directly with the protocol. The improvements it brings, such as faster settlement speeds, tighter bid-ask spreads, and better financial product terms due to lower operational costs, will gradually reach end-users through the product layer, rather than being presented in a way users can directly perceive.

VI. Next Steps

Canton's 3-to-5-year goals provided in the interview are not measured by on-chain TVL or token price. Looking at the specific goals Canton listed: stablecoins becoming the standard means for inter-institutional settlement, just as SWIFT wire transfers are the standard now; major financial institutions, like banks, being able to directly operate loans, deposits, bond issuance, and product packaging on-chain; cross-border capital no longer needing to endure settlement cycles of several days in the traditional system but moving at near-real-time speeds; multiple asset classes completing native issuance and settlement on Canton, rather than being issued off-chain first and then manually syncing information on-chain.

Canton uses "invisible" to describe itself in this state: By then, Canton would just be one of the underlying protocols quietly powering global finance, like TCP/IP for the internet today or SWIFT for cross-border remittances. Users wouldn't perceive its existence, but nothing would work without it.

Of course, this road is still long. Regulation is highly fragmented across jurisdictions; compliance methods in Europe are completely different from Asia; integrating with existing legacy systems is very difficult; banks' core systems used for decades cannot migrate overnight; interoperability between different blockchain networks remains an unresolved technical issue; coordinating institutions on the same infrastructure involves complex interest games. The Canton team did not avoid these in the interview, telling us: The technical bottleneck is no longer the biggest problem; how to truly roll it out globally is.

It can be seen that the transformation of financial infrastructure never happens suddenly on a single day. SWIFT was established in 1973 and took nearly two decades to become the true standard for cross-border settlement. People using it today don't think about how it came to be. The position Canton is in now is probably that "no one realizes yet what it will become" stage. But for something that truly wants to become infrastructure, being forgotten might be what success should look like.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the key feature of Canton Network that makes it appealing to traditional financial institutions like Visa, according to the article?

AThe key feature is its native design for data visibility control. It separates coordination (shared network-wide) from data visibility (restricted to transaction participants), allowing institutions to transact securely and privately without exposing sensitive business details like trading positions or strategies to competitors. This enables institutions to conduct normal business on-chain, unlike public chains like Ethereum which are globally transparent.

QWhat milestone regarding Visa's involvement with blockchain does the article highlight?

AThe article highlights that Visa submitted a governance proposal to Canton Network, which was approved in just three days, making Visa a super validator on the network with the highest weight (Super Validator Weight 10). This marks the first time Visa has ever submitted a blockchain governance proposal.

QHow does the article describe the nature and purpose of the CC token in the Canton Network?

AThe article describes CC as a "network utility asset" whose value is tied to the volume of real financial activity on the network. Its demand comes from actual usage. It has a unique allocation model with zero pre-mine, zero team allocation, and zero VC allocation, with all tokens entering the market fairly.

QWhat are some of the primary real-world use cases for Canton Network mentioned in the article?

APrimary use cases include: tokenized repurchase agreements (Repo), enabling 24/7 operations; collateral mobilization between institutions; digital bond issuance, where Canton holds over half the global market share for native digital bond issuance; and atomic settlement, where payment and asset delivery occur simultaneously in a single operation.

QWhat long-term goal does the Canton team have for the network, as stated in the article?

AThe long-term goal is for Canton to become an "invisible" foundational infrastructure for global finance. Similar to how TCP/IP underpins the internet or SWIFT underlies cross-border payments, it would be a protocol that powers financial operations seamlessly in the background, with end-users not directly perceiving it but relying on its benefits like faster settlement and improved financial products.

Letture associate

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit29 min fa

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit29 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit36 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit36 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手38 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手38 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手54 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手54 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片