Detailed Explanation of NYSE's Tokenized Securities Platform: Why It Aims for 7x24 Trading

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-22

Introduzione

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), part of the ICE Group, has announced plans to develop a platform for trading tokenized securities with on-chain settlement, pending regulatory approval. The platform aims to offer a 7x24 trading experience, instant settlement, dollar-based orders, and stablecoin transfers. It will integrate NYSE’s Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system, supporting multi-chain settlement and custody. This move places NYSE in competition with Nasdaq, which submitted a similar proposal to the SEC in 2025. While Nasdaq’s approach is a hybrid model integrating tokenization into existing systems, NYSE’s plan is more radical—a standalone platform enabling T+0 settlement, fractional shares, and extended trading hours. Globally, tokenization of securities is advancing, with initiatives like SIX Digital Exchange in Switzerland and Deutsche Börse’s D7 in Germany. NYSE’s effort is seen as a response to growing global investor demand and competition from crypto markets. Potential impacts include lower entry barriers for retail investors through fractional ownership, improved liquidity, and reduced settlement risk. However, challenges may include increased market volatility, manipulation risks, and higher operational demands on brokers and market makers. For crypto, the news could benefit public blockchains like Ethereum and Solana if adopted for settlement, while stablecoin-based lending protocols may see increased utility. Although short-t...

On January 19, according to official news, the New York Stock Exchange, a subsidiary of the ICE Group, announced today that it is developing a platform for trading tokenized securities and on-chain settlement, and will seek regulatory approval for this.

The NYSE's new digital platform will support a tokenized trading experience, including 7x24 hour round-the-clock operation, instant settlement, order placement by dollar amount, and fund transfers based on stablecoins. Its design integrates the NYSE Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system, capable of supporting multi-chain settlement and custody.

Lynn Martin, President of the ICE Group, stated bluntly: "We are leading the industry towards a fully on-chain solution while maintaining the NYSE's unparalleled protection and high regulatory standards." In other words, they aim to use blockchain to improve efficiency while continuing to win the trust of Wall Street.

Currently, the plan is still in the early development stage and has not been built or fully tested. The NYSE stated that it will seek approval from regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the platform is expected to launch in late 2026.

The first reaction from crypto players might be, "It's over, the正规军 (mainstream institutions) are entering the market on a large scale again. The narrative of trading U.S. stocks on-chain is about to be completely taken away, so what do we have left?" In fact, the on-chain transformation of traditional securities markets is not a trend that emerged only after the significant advancement of cryptocurrency compliance last year; it has been around for a long time. When we take a more detailed look at the past and present of the on-chain transformation of traditional securities in the U.S. and globally, we will find that this is an already unstoppable and continuously advancing trend. Anxiety is reasonable, but confidence is even more necessary.

In the U.S., the NYSE is Actually Racing Against Nasdaq

Compared to the NYSE, which has only just preliminarily announced its on-chain plan, Nasdaq submitted a formal related proposal to the SEC last year.

On September 8, 2025, Nasdaq submitted proposal SR-NASDAQ-2025-072 to the SEC, aiming to amend rules to allow the trading of tokenized securities on the Nasdaq market and integrate blockchain technology for settlement and clearing. The proposal emphasizes that blockchain can bring faster settlement, improved audit trails, and a more seamless order-to-settlement process.

If approved, this feature is expected to be available by the end of the third quarter of 2026. The proposal has entered the SEC review stage, and a revised version (Amendment No. 1) was submitted on December 29, 2025.

By comparison, the NYSE seems to have fallen behind Nasdaq, but in fact, this new plan by the NYSE is not a hasty response to Nasdaq; it is a continuation of the long-term blockchain布局 (layout/strategy) of the NYSE's parent company, ICE.

As early as 2015, ICE began exploring blockchain technology and launched the Bakkt platform (focused on crypto futures and custody) in 2018. In 2021, the platform went public on the NYSE through a SPAC merger with VPC Impact Acquisition Holdings.

Last August, ICE partnered with Chainlink to provide foreign exchange and precious metal exchange rate data on-chain through Chainlink. In October, ICE announced a strategic investment of up to $20 billion in Polymarket. There were also reports late last year that ICE was in talks to invest in MoonPay.

More notably, the on-chain reform plans for securities adopted by the NYSE and Nasdaq are different.

Nasdaq's方案 (plan) adopts a "hybrid model." Traders can choose traditional form or tokenized form (using blockchain) for settlement when entering orders. All trades are executed in the same order book, using the same CUSIP identifiers, execution rules, and priority. Clearing and settlement are handled by the DTC. Tokenization is only an optional "digital representation" form and does not change the existing structure (such as the T+1 settlement cycle).

That is to say, Nasdaq is not creating a brand-new, independent on-chain securities trading platform; instead, it is integrating tokenized securities into the existing system, emphasizing compatibility with the current system, minimizing disruption to the existing infrastructure, and avoiding creating new risks. Although there were reports at the end of last year that Nasdaq was seeking approval to allow the market to trade 5 days a week, 23 hours a day, it is still a gradual and温和的 (moderate) reform.

The NYSE's plan is clearly more激进 (radical). They aim to create a brand-new, independent on-chain securities trading platform. ICE is collaborating with banks such as Bank of New York Mellon and Citigroup to support tokenized deposits in its clearinghouse, helping clearing members transfer and manage funds outside traditional banking hours, fulfill margin obligations, and adapt to the fund needs of different jurisdictions and time zones.

This摆脱 (breaks free from) the limitation of traditional bank clearing windows that are only open on weekdays. For the NYSE, T+0, 7x24 hour round-the-clock trading, fractional share trading, and support for stablecoin funds are all must-haves. Compared to Nasdaq, this is undoubtedly a more profound transformation.

Globally, the exploration of securities tokenization and even asset tokenization has long begun and is flourishing. Examples include Switzerland's SIX Digital Exchange (SDX), Germany's Deutsche Börse D7 platform, the UK's Archax, and Singapore's DBS Bank Digital Exchange. However, a reform plan as激进 (radical) as the NYSE's can still be called "unprecedented."

The race between the NYSE and Nasdaq is by no means just to "earning a little more commission"; it is an active出击 (offensive) in the new landscape of global competition entering the traditional securities trading market. Like Nasdaq, the NYSE's securities trading platform, NYSE Arca, also submitted a proposal to extend trading hours and is awaiting formal approval, and this was back in 2024.

The London Stock Exchange (LSE) and Asian exchanges (such as Tokyo or Hong Kong) are also discussing extending trading hours.

For traditional stock exchanges, extending trading hours is not as simple as it seems on the surface—"opening for a few more hours." The exchange side has many technical modifications, such as closing prices, ex-rights, ex-dividends, etc., and also faces potential network stability challenges. At the securities broker level, upgrades are also required to follow these changes.

Historically, extending trading hours has been a trend that has never stopped伴随着 (accompanying) technological progress. Taking the U.S. as an example, in the 1920s–1940s, the daily trading time of the securities market was only about 5 hours; it increased to about 6 hours in the 1950s–1970s, and to about 6.5 hours in the 1980s–1990s, until reaching about 16 hours in the 21st century.

According to data from a Deloitte report, in June 2023, foreign investors' holdings of U.S. securities had already reached $26.86 trillion. Among the reasons for extending trading hours, there must be one point: to better包容 (accommodate) and even attract foreign investors.

NYSE executive Kevin Tyrrell stated in an interview with CNBC: "Interest in U.S. equities continues to grow among both retail and institutional investors, both in the U.S. and globally. The 22-hour/5-day (5 days a week, 22 hours a day) extended trading plan we developed is based on numerous exchanges with market participants and our own data and analysis. Given the current level of investor demand and the availability of existing market infrastructure, we believe the 22-hour/5-day extended trading plan is the right approach."

For international companies wanting to list, they want to land in the world's most liquid U.S. stock market. If one of the NYSE or Nasdaq supports round-the-clock trading, they would prefer the one that supports it, as it is more time-friendly.

Although stock exchanges are also aware of the risks that round-the-clock trading may bring and the upgrade costs to be paid, the endless cryptocurrency market that has been running for years and its attraction to global users has become their best "teacher." Whether it is extending trading hours or improving trading and settlement efficiency, embracing investors worldwide is something they must strive to do. Traditional securities are not stuck in "tradition"; they are also constantly evolving.

Impact on Traditional Markets

Support for fractional share trading will undoubtedly significantly lower the entry barrier for retail investors again. One major advantage of cryptocurrency compared to traditional stock markets is that even if Bitcoin rises to $1 million each, retail investors can still buy just $10 worth of it. But if the NYSE's vision is ultimately realized, everyone will also be able to buy $10 worth of U.S. stock giants like Nvidia, Tesla, or Apple.

7x24 hour round-the-clock trading and T+0 settlement will greatly accelerate the market pace of traditional stock markets. On the positive side, settlement risks and cross-time zone friction will be greatly reduced, and the flexibility of investment and the efficiency of price discovery will be greatly improved.

Risks also exist. More剧烈 (violent) fluctuations and more emotional trading, the possible liquidity dispersion caused by a non-stop market, and more price manipulation. Especially during the closing periods of traditional securities trading markets, the on-chain environment could potentially become a "paradise" more prone to滋生 (breeding) "恶庄 (malicious market makers)" and insider trading.

Due to changes in trading and settlement mechanisms, the strategies of traditional institutions and market makers may also enter a stage of你追我赶 (catching up with each other) upgrades, like the NYSE and Nasdaq. Faced with upgraded round-the-clock information monitoring and automated trading strategies, for retail investors, whether this progress means more opportunities or more残酷 (cruel) competition is really hard to say.

Which Cryptocurrency Projects Have Potential Benefits

Although the NYSE announcement mentioned that it "will support multi-chain settlement and custody," no further details have been revealed on whether this means public chains like Ethereum and Solana. If so, it would undoubtedly be a major利好 (positive factor) for public chain tokens.

When stablecoins on-chain can directly enter U.S. stock targets through the NYSE's channel, the probability of another altseason in the crypto circle will shrink again in the short term. The reason for saying short-term is that the demand for on-chain stablecoins to enter U.S. stocks has never had a chance to be satisfied. Once the channel is opened, it will certainly create a significant虹吸效应 (siphon effect) in the short term.

But over the years, the crypto circle has also沉淀 (precipitated/settled) a group of investors with distinct characteristics. The overall investment environment of the crypto circle is quite different from the stock market. Whether to choose stability or the dream of hundredfold or thousandfold returns, how investors will choose can still be observed over a longer term.

For crypto projects like AAVE and Compound that provide stablecoin lending, the NYSE's plan is无异于 (nothing less than) a "narrative falling from the sky." For projects like Ondo that were previously dedicated to introducing U.S. stocks on-chain, they will experience the pain of transformation.

For the crypto market, it is about to face an unprecedented challenge from the traditional securities market. For the crypto industry, this is区块链技术 (blockchain technology) "gaining another foothold" in the traditional financial market, another milestone progress for the industry as a whole.

So does this mean the future of the crypto market is becoming increasingly黯淡 (bleak)? I believe not. I believe that with the overall progress of the industry, the future trend of "tokenization of everything" is unstoppable, and securities are just one of the万物 (myriad things). The crypto market will still be a place where miracles happen. Believe in the future.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the key features of the NYSE's new digital platform for tokenized securities?

AThe NYSE's new digital platform will support a tokenized trading experience, including 7x24 hour operation, instant settlement (T+0), dollar-based order entry, and stablecoin-based fund transfers. It integrates the NYSE Pillar matching engine with a blockchain-based post-trade system and has the capability to support multi-chain settlement and custody.

QHow does the NYSE's approach to tokenized securities differ from Nasdaq's proposed 'hybrid model'?

AThe NYSE is building a new, independent platform for tokenized securities trading, aiming for a more radical transformation with features like T+0, 24/7 trading, fractional shares, and stablecoin support. In contrast, Nasdaq's hybrid model integrates tokenized securities as an optional 'digital representation' into its existing system, maintaining compatibility with current infrastructure like the T+1 settlement cycle and minimizing disruption.

QWhat is the primary motivation behind traditional exchanges like the NYSE and Nasdaq moving towards longer trading hours and tokenization?

AThe primary motivation is to compete in the new landscape of globalized securities trading. This includes attracting more international investors and companies seeking listings by offering more accessible trading hours (like 24/5 or 24/7), reducing settlement risk, improving price discovery efficiency, and embracing the operational efficiencies demonstrated by the cryptocurrency markets.

QWhat potential risks does the article associate with the move to 24/7 trading and T+0 settlement for traditional stocks?

APotential risks include more volatile and emotional trading, the possibility of liquidity becoming fragmented, and an increased potential for price manipulation and insider trading, especially during the traditional market's former closed periods, which could become a breeding ground for such activities.

QAccording to the article, what is the potential short-term impact on the cryptocurrency market from the NYSE's new platform?

AIn the short term, the article suggests a potential 'siphoning effect' where stablecoin liquidity on-chain could be drawn towards trading tokenized stocks on the NYSE platform. This could temporarily reduce the probability of a 'altcoin season' in the crypto market as capital flows to this new, major demand outlet for stablecoins.

Letture associate

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbit6 min fa

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbit6 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbit13 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbit13 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手16 min fa

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手16 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手32 min fa

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手32 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片