Chainlink whales grow 25% in a year as supply tightens: Can LINK hit $27?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-04-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-03

Introduzione

Chainlink network activity and institutional adoption have grown significantly over the past year, with the number of whales holding over 1 million LINK increasing by 25%. Despite this accumulation and a tightening circulating supply, LINK's price has remained bearish, influenced by geopolitical tensions. Key factors reducing supply include the Chainlink Reserve's ongoing accumulation—now at 2.93 million tokens—fueled by fees from institutional use, such as Multipli's $340 million rwaUSD distribution and Polymarket's $3.5 billion trading volume. Currently, LINK is consolidating near April 2025 lows, with a potential breakout above its resistance trendline possibly driving a rally toward $27 if buyer strength increases.

Network activity on Chainlink [LINK] has been growing over the past year, though its price action has been declining. Institutions have adopted the oracle as whales continue to accumulate the altcoin.

Chainlink whales grow by 25% in a year

The number of Chainlink whales holding well over 1 million LINK tokens has grown by 25% in just one year. That is, from 100 in April 2025 to 125 in April of 2026. Meanwhile, their holdings have continued to grow.

However, prices have remained bearish. This decline has been made worse by the escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Why LINK’s supply could tighten even more

The fundamentals were tightening the circulating supply of LINK tokens in the market.

For instance, Chainlink Reserve added more than 137,004 LINK tokens worth $1.17 million. This took the total holdings to 2.93 million, valued at $25.6 million, with the chart showing steady growth since last year in August.

The reserve is expected to continue growing, thanks to fees collected from institutions paying for the oracle services.

For example, Multipli will be distributing its $340 million rwaUSD through Chainlink. The stablecoin is backed by tokenized U.S. equities, which brings liquidity into the chain.

Additionally, Polymarket, which had been integrated into the ecosystem, saw $3.5 billion in trading volume. More than 3,000 traders signed up for Data Streams, expanding the revenue streams of the oracle.

Such increased activity from institutions raised revenue generation. These developments suggested the reserve would increase their effort to cut the circulating supply.

Price action aligning with April 2025 lows

The price action chart of Chainlink was consolidating just below the April 2025 lows. Last year, the altcoin consolidated during the second quarter, and towards the end, it started to rally upwards.

These lows led to LINK’s rally for 2025.

Chainlink has been moving sideways since the start of February, putting it in a two-month range. It also traded around the slanting resistance trendline, though bears seemed to be in control.

The MACD is faintly red, meaning the strength of sellers is diminishing. If the price breaks out of the range and above the trendline, whales could potentially push LINK higher, possibly back to its 2025 highs around $27.

If the price continues to trade between $8 and $9.40, the breakout to either side could be huge.

Final Summary

Chainlink whales grow by 25% in a year as supply continues to tighten.
LINK is consolidating just below the lows that sparked the rally in 2025.

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

Domande pertinenti

QBy what percentage did the number of Chainlink whales grow in one year, and what was the minimum holding amount to be considered a whale?

AThe number of Chainlink whales grew by 25% in one year. A whale is defined as an address holding well over 1 million LINK tokens.

QWhat are two key reasons mentioned for the potential tightening of LINK's circulating supply?

ATwo key reasons are the growth of the Chainlink Reserve, which accumulates tokens from service fees, and increased institutional activity (like Multipli's rwaUSD distribution and Polymarket's integration), which generates more revenue to be added to the reserve.

QWhat was the value of the 137,004 LINK tokens recently added to the Chainlink Reserve, and what is the reserve's total value?

AThe 137,004 LINK tokens added were worth $1.17 million. The total holdings of the Chainlink Reserve are valued at $25.6 million.

QAccording to the price chart analysis, what is the potential price target for LINK if it breaks out of its current range?

AThe potential price target if LINK breaks out is a return to its 2025 highs around $27.

QWhat current market factor was cited as having worsened the bearish price decline of LINK?

AThe escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East was cited as a factor that worsened the bearish price decline.

Letture associate

Actually, the Largest Use Case for Stablecoin Payments Is Not Cross-Border

Based on an analysis of $15.2 billion in identified on-chain stablecoin transfers, the data reveals that cross-border remittances represent only a portion of stablecoin demand. The dominant use case is domestic transfers, accounting for 62.6% ($9.5B) of the identified volume. Key markets include Turkey, South Korea, Mexico, Indonesia, and the US. This indicates stablecoins are widely used for domestic payments, transactions, and dollar-denominated savings within countries. Furthermore, 73.0% of all identified transaction volume (including domestic) stays within the sender's broader geographic region. The Asia-Pacific (APAC) region leads in stablecoin activity, contributing 41.0% of total sent volume and 41.6% of global domestic volume. It also shows a net inflow of funds, with Indonesia, Singapore, and South Korea being notable recipients. Major cross-border corridors already exist, such as Turkey-Indonesia and US-Mexico. Within APAC, corridors like Taiwan-Indonesia and Indonesia-South Korea show significant bilateral flows. For institutions, the key market opportunities currently lie in domestic settlement services and developing cross-border payment channels within the APAC region, which combines the largest transaction scale, high domestic usage, and positive net inflows.

marsbit33 min fa

Actually, the Largest Use Case for Stablecoin Payments Is Not Cross-Border

marsbit33 min fa

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbit1 h fa

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbit1 h fa

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit2 h fa

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit2 h fa

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit3 h fa

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit3 h fa

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit5 h fa

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit5 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare LINK

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di ChainLink (LINK) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ChainLinkLINK.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva ChainLink (LINK)Dopo aver acquistato ChainLink (LINK), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia ChainLink (LINK)Scambia facilmente ChainLink (LINK) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

954 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di LINK LINK sono presentate come di seguito.