Blockchain Association Urges Senate To Pass CLARITY Act With Letter Backed By 160 Ex-Officials

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-06-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-04

Introduzione

The Blockchain Association, along with 160 former national security and law enforcement officials, has urged Senate leaders to pass the CLARITY Act. They argue that without clear federal regulation, crypto activity will move to opaque offshore markets, hindering U.S. efforts to combat financial crime. The letter highlights that the Act would strengthen law enforcement by expanding anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, improving information sharing between agencies like the Treasury, DOJ, and FBI, and enhancing oversight of digital asset kiosks with measures like transaction monitoring and fraud prevention. The Association emphasizes these are enforcement enhancements, not deregulation. Momentum for the bill is building, with a Senate vote expected this summer, though it would still need reconciliation with a previously passed House version.

The Blockchain Association, one of the industry’s biggest advocacy groups, urged Senate leadership to move forward on the long-awaited CLARITY Act in a letter sent Tuesday to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, signed by 160 former national security, intelligence, and law enforcement professionals.

The signatories contend that without a clear federal framework, crypto-related activity could continue to move offshore into markets they describe as opaque—making it harder for US investigators to reach, monitor, and pursue financial crime.

Key CLARITY Act Provisions

The Blockchain Association’s letter emphasizes that the CLARITY Act would expand law enforcement and financial crime prevention capabilities across the digital asset ecosystem.

It highlights several enforcement-focused measures aimed at improving detection, coordination, and accountability. Among the key provisions described are strengthened anti-illicit finance obligations, including expanded Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and sanctions requirements.

The letter also mentions information sharing led by the Treasury with the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), and the private sector.

The group further argues that the bill would bolster safeguards for digital asset kiosks, citing requirements meant to improve oversight. Those include transaction monitoring and reporting duties, transaction limits, anti-fraud provisions, and dedicated law enforcement points of contact.

The Blockchain Association says these tools are particularly important for seniors and other Americans who are frequently targeted by scams, and it frames the measures as enforcement enhancements rather than reductions in regulation.

“These are not deregulatory measures,” the letter says, describing the proposal instead as a way to improve visibility, coordination, compliance, and accountability across digital asset markets.

The Road Ahead

To reinforce that message, the Blockchain Association is also set to host a virtual town hall on Thursday focused on how the legislation supports law enforcement and national security.

The event is expected to include participation from Senator Cynthia Lummis, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, and Patrick Witt, the White House Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

Amid the group’s call, momentum for the CLARITY Act has already been built. After the Agriculture Committee markup successfully approved its portion of the bill back in January, the bill’s Agriculture Committee portion also advanced. With those steps completed, a full Senate vote is expected this summer.

Even if the CLARITY Act clears the Senate, the legislation would still face a second major hurdle: approval by the House. The House has previously acted on a version of the bill, passing a different draft last fall.

As a result, the final Senate text may need additional reconciliation with the House’s earlier version before it can move forward.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap dropping below $2.2 trillion on Wednesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main purpose of the letter sent by the Blockchain Association to Senate leadership?

AThe main purpose of the letter is to urge the Senate to move forward and pass the long-awaited CLARITY Act, arguing that a clear federal framework is needed to prevent crypto-related activity from moving to opaque offshore markets and to enhance US law enforcement's ability to combat financial crime.

QAccording to the letter, what would be a key consequence of not passing the CLARITY Act?

AA key consequence would be that cryptocurrency-related activity could continue to move offshore into markets described as opaque, making it harder for US investigators to reach, monitor, and pursue financial crimes.

QHow does the Blockchain Association frame the enforcement measures in the CLARITY Act?

AThe association frames the measures, such as strengthened anti-illicit finance obligations and improved oversight for digital asset kiosks, as enforcement enhancements that improve visibility, coordination, compliance, and accountability, rather than as deregulatory measures.

QWhat upcoming event is the Blockchain Association hosting to support the CLARITY Act, and who is expected to participate?

AThe association is hosting a virtual town hall on Thursday focused on how the legislation supports law enforcement and national security. Expected participants include Senator Cynthia Lummis, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, and Patrick Witt, the White House Executive Director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

QWhat are the next legislative hurdles for the CLARITY Act after a potential Senate vote?

AAfter a potential Senate vote this summer, the legislation would need approval by the House of Representatives. Furthermore, the final Senate text may require additional reconciliation with a different version of the bill that the House passed previously.

Letture associate

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit9 min fa

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit9 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit39 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit39 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 h fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 h fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 h fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片