CrossCurve Bridge Exploit Exposes $3 Million Loss in Cross-Chain Security Breach

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-02

Introduzione

CrossCurve, a cross-chain liquidity and bridge protocol, suffered a security breach resulting in approximately $3 million in losses. The exploit was caused by a missing security check in its smart contract, allowing attackers to send fake but valid-looking messages and drain tokens. The incident resembles the 2022 Nomad bridge hack and highlights that even protocols with multiple validation systems (like Axelar and LayerZero) remain vulnerable to single coding errors. CrossCurve and its backer, Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov, advise users to pause all interactions with the protocol, review exposures to CrossCurve-related pools, and await official updates.

CrossCurve, a cross-chain liquidity and bridge protocol, has confirmed that its bridge system was hacked, resulting in a loss of around $3 million. This affected multiple blockchains and is now under investigation. CrossCurve warns the users to pause all activity interacting with the protocol.

How Attackers Hacked the Bridge system

The missing security check from the CrossCurve smart contract was the major reason for this hack. The Smart Contract needs to verify the messages sent between the blockchains, but one of the verification steps was incommpleete which allowed the attackers to trick the system by sending fake messages that look valid to the system. This allowed the attacker to hack the token from the contract.

Security experts say that this exploit resembles the Nomad bridge hack in 2022, which drained around $190 million. They raised concerns that basic security mistakes are happening years later despite several past warnings.

CrossCurve has promoted its bridge as one of the safer and more secure bridges than others because it relies on multiple independent validation systems, such as Axelar, LayerZero, and its own oracle network. But this incident shows that despite multiple systems, a single coding mistake can still be exploited.

What must users do after this exploit?

The project, backed by Michael Egorov, the founder of Curve Finance, has reportedly raised around $7 million from investors. After the incident, Curve Finance warns users to review their positions and consider removing those who have exposure to CrossCurve-related pools.

Right now, the users should not interact with the CrossCurve until further notice and review any exposure to CrossCurve-related pools. They should look for any official updates from the team and be cautious with the cross-chain bridges.

Highlighted Crypto News:

U.S. Treasury Sanctions UK Crypto Exchanges for Iran Sanctions Evasion

TagsCross-ChainCryptocurrency

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the primary cause of the CrossCurve Bridge security breach?

AThe primary cause was a missing security check in the CrossCurve smart contract, specifically an incomplete verification step for messages sent between blockchains, which allowed attackers to send fake but valid-looking messages.

QHow much was lost in the CrossCurve Bridge exploit?

AApproximately $3 million was lost in the exploit.

QWhich previous bridge hack does this incident resemble, according to security experts?

ASecurity experts stated that this exploit resembles the Nomad bridge hack in 2022, which resulted in a loss of around $190 million.

QWhat should users do in response to the CrossCurve exploit, as warned by the protocol?

AUsers should pause all activity interacting with the CrossCurve protocol, review their positions, and consider removing any exposure to CrossCurve-related pools until further official notice.

QWhat validation systems did CrossCurve promote as making its bridge secure before the incident?

ACrossCurve promoted its reliance on multiple independent validation systems, including Axelar, LayerZero, and its own oracle network, to claim it was one of the safer bridges.

Letture associate

Actually, the Crypto Winter Began in January 2025

The crypto winter began in January 2025, though many only recently acknowledged it. Bitcoin and Ethereum have fallen 39% and 53% from their October 2025 peaks, with steeper declines for other assets. This is a full bear market, not a correction, driven by over-leverage and profit-taking. Positive developments like regulatory progress and institutional adoption have been ignored amid the downturn, typical of crypto winters where good news fails to lift prices. Historically, crypto winters last around 13 months. However, this one may be closer to ending than it appears, as it effectively started in January 2025. ETF and digital asset trust (DAT) inflows masked the reality for some assets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP saw milder declines (10–20%) due to institutional support, while assets like ADA, AVAX, SUI, and DOT fell 62–75% without such backing. Without $75 billion in ETF/DAT buying, Bitcoin’s drop would have been closer to 60%. The retail crypto market has been in winter since January 2025. Despite the gloom, fundamental strengths remain: regulatory clarity, institutional adoption, stablecoins, tokenization, and Wall Street embrace. These positive factors are stored energy that will fuel the next rally when sentiment shifts. Triggers could include strong economic growth, pro-crypto regulatory surprises, sovereign adoption of Bitcoin, or simply time. As with past winters, the end feels near—despair and frustration are common precursors to recovery. Spring is likely coming soon.

marsbit58 min fa

Actually, the Crypto Winter Began in January 2025

marsbit58 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片