NFT 像素风头像成富人的 “数字资产身份证”,时尚界也蠢蠢欲动

Vogue BusinessPubblicato 2022-03-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-03-24

Introduzione

NFT像素风格头像,或称NFTprofilepictures(PFPs),已经成为许多有能力投资Web3.0人士的期望资产,更是他们彰显自己能力、地位和财富的“数字资产身份证”。

NFT像素风格头像,或称NFTprofilepictures(PFPs),已经成为许多有能力投资Web3.0人士的期望资产,更是他们彰显自己能力、地位和财富的“数字资产身份证”。而随着PFPs盛行,动辄一个原版头像能够卖到上百万美金,时尚界也在试图从中分得一杯羹。

PFPs指NFTs产品所有者在Opensea、Discord以及Twitter等互联网平台上所使用的头像。有些PFPs,例如Adidas的合作伙伴Gmoney,已经有了诸如网络红人一般的影响力,甚至出现在Prada的实体秀上。

稀有性对PFPs至关重要,那些不知道原始价格的二级买手,愿意花费数以千计,有时甚至是数千万美金来购买更流行的系列。LVMH集团的三公子AlexandreArnault就在今年二月购买了价值416,400美元、佩戴着橘红色帽子和3D眼镜的朋克数字图像,成为他在Instagram等社交平台上的新头像。又如著名歌星JustinBieber在一月购入的新类人猿,身着黑灰色T恤衫,价值高达130万美元。

图片来源:PageSix

影响力与金钱指向哪里,时尚将会随其发展。

很多新兴科技公司正在探索装扮PFPs的方法,这意味着将利用服饰与配饰来改变它们原始的形象,与自主设计的画像(如Roblox)和发布的个人头像(如DressX)不同,这些都是具有极强风格特点的服装,符合PFP系列的审美。

PFPs是NFTs界最受欢迎的形式,它通常围绕着一个主题或特点切入,是由发行方创作和设计而形成的图像集,拥有某种PFPs也可能包括一些私人俱乐部和活动的入场券。

由于其稀缺性和复杂性,一些PFPs的设计价值会增加,如同当下流行的一些知名系列,Cryptopunks、无聊猿游艇俱乐部(BoredApeYachtClub,同Adidas合作创办)、女性世界(WorldofWomen,同ReeseWitherspoon的HelloSunshine合作)以及由数字时尚公司Rtfkt制作的克隆X(CloneX)系列,都属上述作品类型。

知名PFPsCryptopunks系列。图片来源:artnet

知名PFPs无聊猿游艇俱乐部(BoredApeYachtClub)系列。图片来源:Medium

知名PFPs女性世界(WorldofWomen)系列。图片来源:RollingStone

通常情况下,在作品被标价曝出之前,作者并不知道他们的设计属于哪种类型,这将意味着除非他们进行交易,否则作者不会限制大众如何看待他们的作品。得益于先进技术,PFPs的所有者能够装扮他们创造的角色,帮助他们呈现前所未有的个性化作品,这也为品牌们提供了有力机会,凭借精心设计的PFPs形象帮助穿戴者提升价值和地位,在Web3.0中崭露头角。

MeganKaspar是MagneticCapital的总经理兼专注于数字时尚的RedDAO成员(RedDAO收购了Dolce&Gabbana的NFT皇冠)。她在采访中讲到,“对NFT界艺术品和数字图像来说,PFPs是迄今为止最好的趋势研究案例。”

RedDAO是一个去中心化的自治组织,并由集体集资而成立,成员们已经开始装扮他们的数字角色,他们计划将通过Dolce&Gabbana获取更多数字时装,同时Dolce&Gabbana也正计划与Unxd合作推出下一个NFT系列。

Kasper指出,一些克隆X和无聊猿系列的收藏者,尽管不是正式形式,但已经为他们的PFP角色进行了装扮。“我们很可能在2022年的数字化NFT时尚中看到这种流行趋势。”

ChampionandTafi图片来源:CHAMPIONXTAFI

体育用品巨头公司一直是先行者:最近,ChampionAthleticwear发布了数字服装和配饰,并随机赠送给888名NFT系列数字人物的持有者,他们可以穿上新的Champion单品来"升级"他们的PFP。虽然没有实物产品,但这种升级将迎来新的NFT系列。另外,Adidas与ApeCloset合作,让每只无聊猿都穿上Adidas的服装;Nike收购了克隆XPFPs的公司(这可能是NFT穿上Nike的好机会,但Nike暂未作出回应);而Puma刚刚宣布与NFT创作者CatBlox合作,并正在筹备其他PFPs的收购事宜。

Adidas与ApeCloset合作,让每只无聊猿都穿上Adidas的衣服。图片来源:AfricaPearl

奢侈品和时尚品牌虽然目前没有完全拥抱PFPs头像潮,但一些品牌正在逐步加入。

今年1月,奢侈手表品牌LouisMoinet向PFPs所有者出售数字单品,这也使他们能够将自己的PFP打造为LouisMoinet的风格。上周四,Gucci(另一个元宇宙的先行者)预告即将与10ktf的合作,推出将品牌故事、NFT配件、PFP和虚拟世界结合在一起的游戏化项目。目前,10ktf已经完成了11个PFP系列的配件,包括无聊猿社区(BoredApeKennel)、游艇俱乐部(YachtClubs)、酷猫(CoolCats)、被遗忘的符文-巫师的信仰(ForgottenRunesWizard'sCult)以及女性世界(WorldofWomen)。

"这对品牌来说是一个千载难逢的机会,"Tafi商务高级副总裁JessicaRizzuto说,"Tafi创造了与Champion合作的数字人物系列,并能够为PFP提供服装和配饰,同时与NFT网红合作也有巨大的价值。"

品牌参与PFP头像热潮的潜力巨大

NiftyTailor带来PFPs装扮。图片来源:NIFTYTAILOR

创始人们预计,打开拥有者对PFPs的装扮能力,将进一步加强NFT与时尚的联系,例如,为了更加匹配LouisMoinet的腕表,PFPs可显示真实的手腕。NiftyTailor的创始人预计PFP将从二维扩展到三维,以能够在元宇宙中运行。Rtkft自归入Nike旗下后,发布了一系列类似衣橱的"储藏舱",以展示数字收购情况。Rtkft的克隆XPFP系列目前没有呈现脚的部位,而Nike公司暂未对是否增加脚的部位作出回应。

对于使用PFP作为头像的人们来说,这可能成为一种"有价值的资产",数字时尚面料商NiftyTailor的联合创始人表示,“如果Eminem拥有一只Ape,并戴着Balenciaga的帽子,这便会是特有财产;如果一个设计师创造了一个标志性的作品,并且很多人使用它,这件作品就有机会成为潮流。"

超越Apes

NiftyTailor的两位创始人说,他们对PFPs社区有浓厚兴趣,但他们受雇于其他公司,所以使用Web3.0的化名。NiftyTailor的联合创始人Kryptoragazzo说,当Discord上的人们看到他用数字技术给他的无聊猿穿上西装时,便开始向他提供加密货币,请求他帮忙完成这件事。

为NFTs装扮这一项目仍在发展中,有许多技术尚待完善。比如,对于Champion和LouisMoinet来说,选择在他们的PFPs上添加新配件,会完全替换掉原来的NFTs,这意味着无法再回到原来的版本。在LouisMoinet的案例中,人们购买了一个NFT手表,以升级他们的PFP,如果卖掉PFP,他们也仍然拥有独立的数字手表。

TAFIANDLOUISMOINET图片来源:@Vogue

虽然最初只是在NFT上叠加数字内容,但现在NiftyTailor可以帮助Ape所有者创造出任意穿着新衣服的NFTs,并努力帮助PFPs实现同样效果。服装由独立艺术家制作,但与时尚品牌合作,将有更大的可能帮助装扮PFPs,同时也提供另一种收入来源,这种举措也会逐步向衍生品发展。

另外一种方式是将物品分层,就像在真实世界一样。Roblox已尝试探索这种方式,实现同时穿戴不同来源的多种元件,但这些数字服装不是NFTs。

图片来源:Forbes

"真正有趣的是,当你改变一个特征时,该特征的稀有性也将发生变化,所以你可能会拥有一个可组合的NFT,例如你所拥有的NFT由四个不同的部分组成,这将增加不同层次的复杂性和价值。"Rizzuto说。

Rizzuto认为PFPs完全换装指日可待。"在未来某一天你可以在个人照片中,真实附上自己购入的LouisVuitton、高端太阳镜、超级飞艇手表以及任何能够展现自己的单品,"Rizzuto说道,"这是Web3.0的下一个发展趋势,就是以自己喜欢的方式来展示自己,这也将得到赞助商的青睐。"

图片来源:VogueSG

Letture associate

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbit6 min fa

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbit6 min fa

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

The article tells the story of Nate Parrott, a designer at Anthropic who created Claude Design as a side project to keep pace with his engineering teammates. When Anthropic released Opus 4.5 in November 2025, the two engineers on Parrott's Claude Code team significantly increased their output using the new AI capabilities. Parrott, the sole designer, found himself struggling to match their speed, becoming a bottleneck in the workflow. To catch up, he began experimenting in his spare time. He initially tried prompting Claude to generate designs from text descriptions and screenshots, with limited success. His breakthrough came when he shifted focus from asking Claude to "design" to asking it to generate HTML. He realized HTML could be a rich visual canvas for creating everything from slides and interactive prototypes to full web pages. He built a simple interface with a chat panel on the left and a live HTML preview on the right. The key to making the output useful was incorporating Anthropic's brand system—fonts, colors, assets, and design principles—into the prompts. This ensured generated designs were immediately on-brand. He shared an internal prototype with his team, and other product designers quickly adopted it for creating clickable prototypes, a task traditionally requiring manually drawing every state. The project's "official" turning point came during an Anthropic Labs offsite, where Parrott noticed many attendees were using his tool to build presentation slides on the fly, sometimes right before their turn to speak. This organic adoption convinced the Labs team to formally staff the project, turning the side project into a real product. Claude Design is positioned as a "pre-production" tool for visual communication and exploration—handling slides, landing pages, PDFs, emails, and social media graphics. It integrates with tools like Canva, Adobe, and Vercel. Its core value is accelerating the early stages of design: exploring directions, building consensus, and establishing systems. For actual production code, Anthropic still recommends Claude Code. The story highlights how AI disrupts workflows unevenly and how individuals can respond by building new tools to create their own advantages. Parrott's tool, born from necessity, eventually gained over a million users in its first week.

marsbit17 min fa

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

marsbit17 min fa

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

The 2026 Fields Medal award was followed by a startling announcement: laureate Jacob Tsimerman joined OpenAI to pursue AI safety research, predicting AI would surpass humans in all mathematical proof areas within two years. Soon after, Fields Medalists Terence Tao and Timothy Gowers expressed deep concern at ICM 2026. Gorges warned that AI might "kill" mathematics not through stagnation, but through an overwhelming surplus of proofs, likening it to a lake dying from eutrophication. This concern is echoed in the "Leiden Declaration," signed by over 3,000 mathematicians including Tao, Peter Scholze, and Kevin Buzzard, advocating for mathematics as a profoundly human endeavor. However, Gowers, who did not sign, fears a future where AI-generated mathematics proliferates while human expertise and the shared intuition vital to the field vanish, turning math into an unvisited "cemetery of thought." Gowers' perspective shifted dramatically after testing ChatGPT 5.5 Pro. The AI solved a doctoral-level number theory problem and later produced a counterexample for the "unit distance problem," achievements Gorges considered publishable in top journals. He now concedes that large language models can handle advanced research, a realization that left him feeling the "rug pulled out from under" him when AI solved problems he personally contemplated. The debate extends to the nature of mathematical discovery. As noted by Peter Woit, AI agents have no interest in the "credit game" of academia. If theorems cease to be attributed to individual mathematicians, truth may simply return to its impersonal state in the universe. The central question remains: in an age of potentially limitless AI-generated discovery, what is the role and purpose of the human mind in mathematics?

marsbit48 min fa

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

marsbit48 min fa

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

In a single weekend, Claude, an AI agent from Anthropic, successfully ported and optimized its cutting-edge model to run on a brand-new AMD MI355X server rack without any manual code intervention. This feat demonstrates a potential breakthrough in overcoming NVIDIA's long-established CUDA software ecosystem dominance, built over two decades. Anthropic's team simply instructed Claude to get the AMD machine running. By Monday, it not only worked but was showing a continuously improving performance curve. The achievement impressed AMD CEO Lisa Su and accelerated a major deployment partnership: Anthropic plans to deploy up to 2GW of AMD Instinct GPUs starting in 2027. The key enabler is AMD's new ROCm.AI platform, a toolbox designed specifically for AI agents like Claude. It provides AI-readable documentation, including chip instruction sets (ISA), and tools like the Hyperloom service that allows agents to autonomously profile performance, identify bottlenecks, test configurations, and generate optimized kernels. In a demo, Hyperloom boosted the output speed of a model by 38%. This represents a fundamental shift. While CUDA's strength lies in its vast, human-expert-driven ecosystem of tools and tacit knowledge, AMD's strategy is to make its hardware and software stack directly accessible and optimizable by AI agents. An agent can parallelize tasks—debugging, profiling, coding—that would take human engineers years to master, compressing the traditional software adaptation timeline from years to tasks. The competition is no longer just about peak hardware specs but also about how well AI can read, utilize, and tune a platform.

marsbit48 min fa

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

marsbit48 min fa

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

Lilian Weng, a Peking University alumnus and former OpenAI executive, has announced her departure from Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup she co-founded with ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati 20 months ago. Her resignation comes shortly after the company released its first open-source model, Inkling. In her farewell message, Weng cited health reasons as the primary factor, stating that the past seven months involved more illness than any other period in her life. The intense pressure and guilt of being unable to work during critical periods, like the Inkling launch, became unsustainable. She expressed that she could not continue in a role where she felt unable to give her full effort. Weng joined OpenAI in 2018, contributing to projects like the Dactyl robotic hand and later building the Safety Systems team from scratch. She is also widely known for her influential technical blog, Lil'Log. Her departure follows a period of high expectations and challenges for Thinking Machines, which secured a record $20 billion seed round at a $120 billion valuation in 2025 but has since seen fluctuations in its valuation and the departure of other key co-founders. Weng emphasized that she remains passionate about AI but needs a more predictable and defined role without the relentless pressure of a co-founder. Her exit highlights the immense personal toll and speed of competition in the AI industry, where the drive for progress often clashes with human limits. Her decision underscores that stepping back to prioritize well-being can be an act of courage.

marsbit1 h fa

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片