Robinhood发射台百团大战,谁能笑到最后

marsbitPubblicato 2026-07-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-20

Introduzione

Noxa关停后,Robinhood链上发射台进入“百团大战”。目前Pons凭借最高的日新币发射量和成交量(日均约4500万美元)暂时领先,其代币$PONS市值一度反弹至2400万美元。市场认为其数据优异,且有知名人士背书,被联想与Bonk社区有关,但竞争远未结束。 其他竞争者各具特色:Arrow此前因高控盘和美股代币抵押借贷概念受关注,现转型为DeFi枢纽,并有Robinhood前员工作顾问;Stonkbroker虽未正式启动,但其结合ERC-6551的NFT玩法(消耗代币激活分红权)已推动其NFT和代币价格大涨;Bankr则推出新功能,允许用户用代币化美股(如$TSLA)与Meme币配对创建交易对,其创始人亲自发行相关代币$REAL尝试引领新趋势。 目前各项目相关代币市值均已超千万美元,战局未定,直接重仓风险较高。更佳策略是密切关注各平台发展,它们竞争越激烈,市场出现的机会可能越多。

Noxa 出人意料地关停后,Robinhood 上就进入了发射台「百团大战」的阶段。接近一周的时间过去,局势已经变得明朗了一些,但仍然有很多不确定性。

Pons:当前的领头羊

刚过去的周末两天,无论是从每日新发射代币数量和每日成交量来看,Pons 都已经取得了领先地位。尤其是在每日成交量这个维度上,Pons 已经连续两日领先于 Noxa,两日内平均日成交量约为 4500 万美元。

虽然 Noxa 已经不再有新币发行,但像 $CASHCAT 等早期影响力大的项目仍然在为其贡献每日成交量数据,并且相当可观。Pons 在每日成交量上的超越,意味着在当前它不但是新标的发射的首选,同时也是当前仍在活跃的流动性的首选。

在昨天,根据日内交易量进行的市占率计算中,Pons 的市占率已经达到了 52.1%。

这帮助 $PONS 的币价在一度跌至约 400 万美元市值后反弹并重新创下约 2400 万美元市值的新高。我们当然可以说,按照 Pons 诞生至今的收入去估算年化,同时结合已经约 20% 的代币燃烧量,去横向对比 $PUMP 的话,$PONS 从 400 万美元反弹回来,是情理之中。

但其实逻辑可以简化并且更明晰一些。首先,市场在押注 Noxa 退场所留下的发射台赛道的巨大空缺,而 Pons 的数据是最好的。其次,需要有注意力事件,并且能留给市场想象空间。Pons 在这方面也是领先的,因为 bonkguy 明牌买入,中间还加仓了一次。加上 WLFI 的顾问 @cryptogle 也一直在喊单 $PONS,这让市场想象 Pons 背后的「阴谋」是 Bonk 帮。

最后,Pons 的领先不能意味着它已经取得了最后的胜利,还有许多台子在跃跃欲试。

Arrow:高控,什么都做

Arrow 这个项目的币价之前能炒到 3500 万美元市值,一个原因是高控:

另一个就是在 meme 币出了 $CASHCAT 这个龙头以后,大家想去找 RWA 概念的机会,刚好它做的是美股代币的抵押借贷。

发射台这个生意实在赚钱,所以 Arrow 也跑过来做,叙事也就从之前的美股代币抵押借贷升级成 Robinhood 上一个配套齐全的 DeFi 枢纽了。在注意力方面,Pons 靠的是 Bonk 帮,Arrow 给出来的叙事是有一个 Robinhood 前员工 Ash Manicka 当项目的战略顾问。

台子目前还没正式开,但马上了,保持观察。

Stonkbroker:台子还没开,NFT 先涨

这个项目在 Robinhood 主网上线前就打算发 NFT 了,并且在测试网时期,项目方就已经做了发射台。

当时的想法是把项目产生的版税收入拿去购买 Robinhood 上的美股代币,再空投给持有者,实现的路径这个 NFT 结合了 ERC-6551,每个 NFT 也同时是一个以太坊钱包,可以直接给 NFT 空投。

使用了 ERC-6551 而不仅仅去跟踪持有者地址就让它在玩法上有很多拓展性。它的台子还没正式启动,但是 NFT 已经被炒到快 2 ETH,币也炒到了最高突破 1500 万美元市值,是周末的大金狗之一。

这个 NFT 总量 4444 个,未来发射台 70% 的收入会拿去购买 Robinhood 上的美股代币,然后空投给 NFT。但是持有者需要消耗一部分 $STONKBROKER 去激活 NFT,才能有分红的资格,消耗的越多,分红的获得的倍数加成越大:

每次 NFT 所有权发生转移,新的持有者想要分红的话又得花 $STONKBROKER 去激活。

所以这基本上就是一个图币飞轮。持有图片相当于台子的股东,但想要分红权就要消耗代币。台子越红火,NFT 拿到的分红越多,激活分红权所对应的代币也越贵。

现在的情况属于台子还没开,但是大家已经把预期炒作拉满了,更多可能是这个玩法比较新颖,加上 NFT 玩家群对这个项目比较感兴趣的原因。这个台子也不单单是发射台,Swap 以及和这个 NFT 系列配套的借贷跟 AMM 都会有。

Bankr:用美股代币做配对来发行 meme

这实在是一个比较取巧的路径,几个小时前 Bankr 刚上线的新功能,支持使用 $TSLA、$AAPL、$SPY 等 90 多种代币化美股来与新发行的 meme 币配成交易对,也就是池子里不是 ETH 了,而是股票。

之前不能说没有类似的玩法。比如 2 个月前在 HyperEVM 上有一个叫 alt.fun 的台子火了几天,它是把包括美股标的在内的合约仓位拿来发 meme 币,上面的龙头最高跑到过 900 万美元市值。

但是要考虑到在 Robinhood CEO 多次表态他们家的链要 RWA 和 meme 两手抓的情况下,这种玩法在这条链上,就显得有炒作的空间了。而且呢,比较戏剧的是,Bankr 的创始人 @0xDeployer 自己出来发了个 $REAL,是和英伟达股票配的交易对,他还在 X 上为这个币招募 CTO 团队,表示要真正会运营的人来,还会提供建议:

如果这个 $REAL 能跑起来,那可能 Bankr 就会通过这种取巧的方式来弯道超车,短期内说不定玩这种美股交易对的 meme 会流行起来。

结语

上面各家台子直接相关的标的($REAL 不算)其实都已经过千万美元市值了,在大战实际上没有尘埃落定的前提下,去下重注存在比较高的风险。这时候最好的策略其实是盯各家台子,他们争得越厉害,机会也会就越多。

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

Q在Robinhood发射台百团大战中,当前哪家平台在数据上取得了领先地位?

A目前是Pons平台在数据上取得了领先地位。在过去一个周末,Pons在每日新发射代币数量和每日成交量这两个关键维度上都领先于其他平台,其日成交量连续两日领先于已关停的Noxa,平均约为4500万美元。在昨日的市占率计算中,Pons更是达到了52.1%。

Q除了Pons,文章还提到了哪几家发射台平台及其主要特点?

A文章还提到了三家有潜力的发射台平台:1. **Arrow**:特点是高控盘,并计划从美股代币抵押借贷业务扩展为Robinhood上配套齐全的DeFi枢纽,其叙事亮点是有一位Robinhood前员工作为战略顾问。2. **Stonkbroker**:特点是采用了NFT与代币结合的“图币飞轮”模式。用户需持有并消耗代币激活NFT才能获得发射台的分红资格。3. **Bankr**:其创新点是支持用户使用代币化美股(如$TSLA、$AAPL)与新的Meme币组成交易对,提供了一种独特的资产配对发行方式。

Q为什么Stonkbroker的NFT价格能被炒高,其背后的经济模型是怎样的?

AStonkbroker的NFT价格能被炒高,主要是因为其新颖且具备吸引力的经济模型。该模型构成了一个“图币飞轮”:1. 发射台70%的收入会用来购买美股代币并空投给NFT持有者。2. 持有者需要消耗项目代币$STONKBROKER来激活NFT,才能获得分红资格,消耗的代币越多,分红倍数加成越高。3. 每次NFT所有权转移后,新持有者都需要重新消耗代币来激活分红权。这种设计将NFT价值与发射台收益、代币消耗和需求紧密绑定,台子越成功,NFT价值越高,激活所需的代币价值也越高,形成相互促进的循环。

QBankr平台采用了什么独特方式来发行Meme币?其创始人有什么具体行动来推广这个模式?

ABankr平台采用了一种独特的发行方式:支持用户使用多达90多种的代币化美股(如$TSLA、$AAPL、$SPY)来与新发行的Meme币配成交易对,而不是传统的ETH。这种方式将Meme币与实体股票资产关联,在Robinhood强调RWA(真实世界资产)的背景下颇具叙事空间。为了推广这一模式,Bankr的创始人@0xDeployer亲自下场示范,发行了一个名为$REAL的Meme币,该币与英伟达(NVIDIA)股票代币配对。他还在社交媒体上公开为$REAL项目招募CTO和团队,并表示会提供运营建议,试图通过打造一个成功案例来带动整个平台和模式的流行。

Q对于目前的发射台竞争局面,文章给出的投资策略建议是什么?

A文章指出,目前各主要发射台平台的相关代币市值均已超过千万美元,在竞争尚未尘埃落定之前,直接下重注押宝某一方存在较高风险。因此,文章建议的最佳策略是保持观察,密切关注各家平台的发展动态和竞争态势。因为平台之间竞争越激烈,为了吸引用户和流动性,就可能创造出更多的机会(例如新的代币发行、空投活动、治理激励等),投资者可以从这些“大战”衍生的机会中寻找切入点,而不是过早地押注最终的胜者。

Letture associate

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbit22 min fa

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbit22 min fa

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

The article tells the story of Nate Parrott, a designer at Anthropic who created Claude Design as a side project to keep pace with his engineering teammates. When Anthropic released Opus 4.5 in November 2025, the two engineers on Parrott's Claude Code team significantly increased their output using the new AI capabilities. Parrott, the sole designer, found himself struggling to match their speed, becoming a bottleneck in the workflow. To catch up, he began experimenting in his spare time. He initially tried prompting Claude to generate designs from text descriptions and screenshots, with limited success. His breakthrough came when he shifted focus from asking Claude to "design" to asking it to generate HTML. He realized HTML could be a rich visual canvas for creating everything from slides and interactive prototypes to full web pages. He built a simple interface with a chat panel on the left and a live HTML preview on the right. The key to making the output useful was incorporating Anthropic's brand system—fonts, colors, assets, and design principles—into the prompts. This ensured generated designs were immediately on-brand. He shared an internal prototype with his team, and other product designers quickly adopted it for creating clickable prototypes, a task traditionally requiring manually drawing every state. The project's "official" turning point came during an Anthropic Labs offsite, where Parrott noticed many attendees were using his tool to build presentation slides on the fly, sometimes right before their turn to speak. This organic adoption convinced the Labs team to formally staff the project, turning the side project into a real product. Claude Design is positioned as a "pre-production" tool for visual communication and exploration—handling slides, landing pages, PDFs, emails, and social media graphics. It integrates with tools like Canva, Adobe, and Vercel. Its core value is accelerating the early stages of design: exploring directions, building consensus, and establishing systems. For actual production code, Anthropic still recommends Claude Code. The story highlights how AI disrupts workflows unevenly and how individuals can respond by building new tools to create their own advantages. Parrott's tool, born from necessity, eventually gained over a million users in its first week.

marsbit32 min fa

Claude Designer Lags Behind Engineers, Fires Back by Creating a Million-User Tool

marsbit32 min fa

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

The 2026 Fields Medal award was followed by a startling announcement: laureate Jacob Tsimerman joined OpenAI to pursue AI safety research, predicting AI would surpass humans in all mathematical proof areas within two years. Soon after, Fields Medalists Terence Tao and Timothy Gowers expressed deep concern at ICM 2026. Gorges warned that AI might "kill" mathematics not through stagnation, but through an overwhelming surplus of proofs, likening it to a lake dying from eutrophication. This concern is echoed in the "Leiden Declaration," signed by over 3,000 mathematicians including Tao, Peter Scholze, and Kevin Buzzard, advocating for mathematics as a profoundly human endeavor. However, Gowers, who did not sign, fears a future where AI-generated mathematics proliferates while human expertise and the shared intuition vital to the field vanish, turning math into an unvisited "cemetery of thought." Gowers' perspective shifted dramatically after testing ChatGPT 5.5 Pro. The AI solved a doctoral-level number theory problem and later produced a counterexample for the "unit distance problem," achievements Gorges considered publishable in top journals. He now concedes that large language models can handle advanced research, a realization that left him feeling the "rug pulled out from under" him when AI solved problems he personally contemplated. The debate extends to the nature of mathematical discovery. As noted by Peter Woit, AI agents have no interest in the "credit game" of academia. If theorems cease to be attributed to individual mathematicians, truth may simply return to its impersonal state in the universe. The central question remains: in an age of potentially limitless AI-generated discovery, what is the role and purpose of the human mind in mathematics?

marsbit1 h fa

Fields Medalist Warns: AI Could Kill Mathematics

marsbit1 h fa

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

In a single weekend, Claude, an AI agent from Anthropic, successfully ported and optimized its cutting-edge model to run on a brand-new AMD MI355X server rack without any manual code intervention. This feat demonstrates a potential breakthrough in overcoming NVIDIA's long-established CUDA software ecosystem dominance, built over two decades. Anthropic's team simply instructed Claude to get the AMD machine running. By Monday, it not only worked but was showing a continuously improving performance curve. The achievement impressed AMD CEO Lisa Su and accelerated a major deployment partnership: Anthropic plans to deploy up to 2GW of AMD Instinct GPUs starting in 2027. The key enabler is AMD's new ROCm.AI platform, a toolbox designed specifically for AI agents like Claude. It provides AI-readable documentation, including chip instruction sets (ISA), and tools like the Hyperloom service that allows agents to autonomously profile performance, identify bottlenecks, test configurations, and generate optimized kernels. In a demo, Hyperloom boosted the output speed of a model by 38%. This represents a fundamental shift. While CUDA's strength lies in its vast, human-expert-driven ecosystem of tools and tacit knowledge, AMD's strategy is to make its hardware and software stack directly accessible and optimizable by AI agents. An agent can parallelize tasks—debugging, profiling, coding—that would take human engineers years to master, compressing the traditional software adaptation timeline from years to tasks. The competition is no longer just about peak hardware specs but also about how well AI can read, utilize, and tune a platform.

marsbit1 h fa

NVIDIA's 20-Year CUDA Moat Collapsed Over a Weekend, Claude Single-Handedly Got AMD's New GPU Running

marsbit1 h fa

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

Lilian Weng, a Peking University alumnus and former OpenAI executive, has announced her departure from Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup she co-founded with ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati 20 months ago. Her resignation comes shortly after the company released its first open-source model, Inkling. In her farewell message, Weng cited health reasons as the primary factor, stating that the past seven months involved more illness than any other period in her life. The intense pressure and guilt of being unable to work during critical periods, like the Inkling launch, became unsustainable. She expressed that she could not continue in a role where she felt unable to give her full effort. Weng joined OpenAI in 2018, contributing to projects like the Dactyl robotic hand and later building the Safety Systems team from scratch. She is also widely known for her influential technical blog, Lil'Log. Her departure follows a period of high expectations and challenges for Thinking Machines, which secured a record $20 billion seed round at a $120 billion valuation in 2025 but has since seen fluctuations in its valuation and the departure of other key co-founders. Weng emphasized that she remains passionate about AI but needs a more predictable and defined role without the relentless pressure of a co-founder. Her exit highlights the immense personal toll and speed of competition in the AI industry, where the drive for progress often clashes with human limits. Her decision underscores that stepping back to prioritize well-being can be an act of courage.

marsbit1 h fa

Just Now, Peking University Alumna Lilian Weng Announces Resignation: The Best 'Alignment' in the AI Era Is Taking Care of Yourself

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare WAR

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di WAR (WAR) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente WARWAR.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva WAR (WAR)Dopo aver acquistato WAR (WAR), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia WAR (WAR)Scambia facilmente WAR (WAR) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

240 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare WAR

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di WAR WAR sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片