分析师表示,Base Dawgz可能是下一个布雷特人

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-10

币界网报道:

看起来布雷特可能会有一些竞争。

每个人都在谈论Base Layer-2网络上的新Base Dawgz(Dawgz)模因币。

一位顶级分析师甚至表示,一旦今年晚些时候在交易所上市,它可能会追随布雷特的脚步。

Base Dawgz——具有多链能力的新型Meme币

那么,为什么围绕着Dawgz基地大肆宣传呢?

这不仅仅是关于它的可爱狗主题——这个项目背后有一些真正的实质。

首先,DAWGZ托管在Base区块链上,最近引起了巨大的轰动。

然而,该代币并不局限于一条链。

开发人员正在采取多链方法,这意味着DAWGZ可以轻松地跨多个区块链移动。

想象一下,您可以在几秒钟内将DAWGZ代币从Base转移到Solana、Avalanche或以太坊。

这就是开发商提供的。

这种多链设置是Base Dawgz的关键特性,但还有其他因素增加了代币的吸引力。

例如,它有一个质押协议,提供924%的APY。

已经质押了超过1.82亿DAWGZ代币,占预售代币总数的33%。

Base Dawgz还有一个“分享赚钱”功能,可以奖励社区成员在社交媒体上分享病毒式内容的更多Dawgz代币。

最终,这是一个独特的生态系统,将模因和效用结合在一起,产生了巨大的效果。

DAWGZ在高调分析师的支持下获得关注

Base Dawgz在预售阶段筹集了280多万美元。

该团队对未来有着雄心勃勃的计划,包括从一开始就在DEX上市,并暗示在CEX上市。

此外,他们还将代币总供应量的20%用于流动性,这对价格稳定来说是一个好兆头。

但这就是事情变得有趣的地方。

加密货币分析师Matthew Perry最近在YouTube上发布了一段关于Base Dawgz的视频,引起了所有人的关注。

佩里拥有超过225000名订阅者,所以当他讲话时,人们会倾听。

佩里在视频中称DAWGZ为“下一个BRETT硬币”

他看到了一些主要的相似之处:这两种硬币都托管在Base上,它们都有值得模因的能量,而且它们的社区正在快速增长。

佩里的支持对道兹基地来说是一个巨大的推动。

BRETT今年的成功证明了Base上模因币的潜力,如果DAWGZ能够抓住这一势头的一小部分,预售投资者可能会获得一些可观的收益。

坚实的令牌组学和路线图定位基础,为长期成功奠定基础

Base Dawgz的代币经济学结构也很好。

该团队为预售投资者和质押奖励留出了20%的资金。

其余的代币专门用于营销、社区奖励和上市——这种设置表明了一种长期愿景,而不是快速的现金掠夺。

Base Dawgz的路线图同样令人印象深刻,其中包括营销活动、CMC列表和额外奖励的计划。

围绕该项目路线图的兴奋已经蔓延到社交媒体上。

Base Dawgz现在在推特和一个拥有8000名成员的Telegram频道上拥有5500多名粉丝。

重要的是,DAWGZ的智能合约已经过SolidProof的审计,并收到了一份清洁健康法案。

这是模因币领域的关键,在这个领域,拉地毯很常见。

考虑到这一切,Matthew Perry说DAWGZ可能是下一个BRETT是对的吗?

鉴于DAWGZ的预售资金、不断增长的社区和多链功能,这些迹象是有希望的。

此外,它是在Base而不是以太坊或Solana上托管的少数模因币之一。

如果团队能够保持这种势头,DAWGZ可能会成功结束到2024年。

参观Dawgz预售基地

免责声明:以上文章为赞助内容;它是由第三方写的。CryptoPotato不对本页面上的内容、广告、产品、质量、准确性或其他材料进行背书或承担责任。其中的任何内容都不应被解释为财务建议。强烈建议读者在参与任何提及的公司或项目之前,独立、仔细地核实信息,并进行自己的研究。投资加密货币存在资金损失的风险,建议读者在做出任何可能基于或可能不基于上述赞助内容的决定之前咨询专业人士。

建议读者阅读CryptoPotato的完整免责声明。

Letture associate

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手6 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手6 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit8 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit8 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手10 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手10 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit11 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片